Background: To describe the development and investigate the accuracy of a novel smartphone-based Contrast Sensitivity (CS) application, the K-CS test. Methods: A total of 67 visually impaired and 50 normal participants were examined monocularly using the novel digital K-CS test and the Pelli-Robson (PR) chart. The K-CS test examines letter contrast sensitivity in logarithmic units, using eight levels of contrast from logCS = ~0,1 to logCS = ~2,1 at two spatial frequencies of 1.5 and 3 cycles per degree (cpd). The K-CS test was compared to the gold standard, PR test and intra-session test repeatability was also examined. Results: The K-CS test in normally sighted was found to agree well with the PR, providing comparable mean scores in logCS (±SD) (K-CS = 1.908 ± 0.06 versus PR = 1.93 ± 0.05) at 1.5 cpd and mean (± SD) logCS at 3 cpd (K-CS = 1.83 ± 0.13 versus PR = 1.86 ± 0.07). The mean best corrected visual acuity of visually impaired participants was 0.67 LogMAR (SD = 0.21) and the K-CS was also found to agree well with the Pelli-Robson in this group, with an equivalent mean (±SD) logCS at 1.5 cpd: (K-CS = 1.19 ± 0.27, PR = 1.15 ± 0.31), 3 cpd: K-CS = 1.01 ± 0.33, PR = 0.94 ± 0.34. Regarding the intra-session test repeatability, both the K-CS test and the PR test showed good repeatability in terms of the 95% limits of agreement (LoA): K-CS = ±0.112 at 1.5 cpd and ±0.133 at 3 cpd, PR = ±0.143 at 1.5 cpd and ±0.183 in 3 cpd in visually impaired individuals. Conclusion: The K-CS test provides a quick assessment of the CS both in normally sighted and visually impaired individuals. The K-CS could serve as an alternative tool to assess contrast sensitivity function using a smartphone and provides results that agree well with the commonly used PR test.

Background: The study aims to present a new smartphone-based photostress recovery time test (K-PSRT test) that measures the stimulus-specific loss of visual sensitivity, as well as the differentiation between normal from abnormal macular function. This novel test defines a new standardized photostress application as an alternative tool for incorporation into clinical practice. Materials and methods: A total of 48 visually impaired eyes and 47 normal sighted age-matched controls eyes were enrolled in the study. The median age in subjects with impairment was 71.0 years, while the median age in normal subjects was 70.0 years. A light produced by the smartphone camera at approximately 5 cm distance, perpendicular to the eye up 10 s filled the pupil. The photostress recovery time was assessed immediately after the exposure by asking the subjects to read correctly at least three successive letters of size corresponding to the previous line of the BCVA line at a distance of 40 cm. The digital photostress testing was performed with the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The patients were examined twice within 2 weeks. Correlations among the recovery times, the visual acuity, and the contrast sensitivity function as well as correlations concerning each specific ocular disease were also performed. Furthermore, correlations among technology, usability, and ease of performance in both groups were analyzed. Results: The initial median photostress recovery time in patients with impaired eyes was 83.5 (68.5, 126.0), while in the normal individuals was 39.0 (14.0, 43.0). The median visual acuity in individuals with impairment was 0.59 logMAR (0.40, 0.90), whereas in the normal individuals was -0,06 logMAR. Test-retest reliability study was performed on 26 eyes (16 males, 10 females) for visually impaired eyes as well as on 35 normal eyes (19 males, 16 females). Concerning the reliability, the average Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (with 95% confidence intervals) ICC (95% CI) = 0,99 (0,98-1,00), indicating significant correlation between them (p < 0.01). The coefficient of repeatability for eye measurements reaches clinically acceptable levels, which is demonstrated with increased repeatability and consistency. The recovery time in patients with diabetic retinopathy was statistically significantly lower than in those with dry age-related macular degeneration (p = 0.027) and those with wet age related macular degeneration (p = 0.032). The patient group has lower scores concerning technology, usability, and ease of performance compared to the normal. Conclusions: This new testing modality (K-Photostress Recovery time test), is designed to be an easily implemented measurement in ophthalmic practice, and it can expand our understanding of macular function. The above findings support the usefulness of a novel reproducible photostress application as an indicator of macular pathology.

We are presenting a new method for the treatment of large macular holes (MHs) with the use of an inverted flap consisting of both internal limiting membrane (ILM) and epiretinal proliferation (EP). A prospective interventional case series was conducted from September 2021 to January 2023. MH patients with coexistent EP visualized preoperatively in macula optical coherence tomography and with a MHs minimum linear diameter larger than 400 microns underwent standard pars plana vitrectomy with the creation of an inverted petaloid flap (consisting of both ILM and EP) and gas tamponade. Sixteen eyes were included in our case series. MHs closure was successful in all the eyes with a single procedure. The preoperative minimum linear diameter was 707.63 (±164.02 μm), and the preoperative best corrected visual acuity was 1.11 ± 0.52. The postoperative BCVA was 0.51 ± 0.20 (p = 0.01) at 6 weeks postoperatively, and the final BCVA was 0.45 ± 0.20 (p = 0.008). EP can be safely combined with ILM for the creation of an inverted, petaloid flap to cover and facilitate the closure of large MHs.

We are presenting a new method for the treatment of large macular holes (MH) with the use of an inverted flap consisting of both internal limiting membrane (ILM) and epiretinal proliferation (EP). A prospective interventional case series was conducted from September 2021 to January 2023. MH patients with coexistent EP visualized preoperatively in macula optical coherence tomography and MH minimum linear diameter larger than 400 microns underwent standard pars plana vitrectomy with the creation of an inverted petaloid flap (consisting of both ILM and EP) and gas tamponade. 16 eyes were included in our study. MH closure was successful in all the eyes with a single procedure. Preoperative minimum linear diameter was 707.63(±164.02μm) and preoperative best corrected visual acuity was 1.11±0.52. Postoperative BCVA was 0.51±0.20 (p=0.01) at 6weeks postoperatively and final BCVA was 0.45±0.20 (p=0.008). EP can be safely combined with ILM for the creation of an inverted, petaloid flap to cover and facilitate the closure of large MH.

Purpose: To examine the seasonality of retinal detachment (RD) and explore global patterns and contributing factors through a narrative review. Methods: Studies investigating seasonal trends in RD incidence across diverse regions were analysed for peak seasons, meteorological influences, and behavioural factors. Results: RD seasonality varies by region. Northern climates (e.g., Finland) report summer peaks linked to prolonged daylight, while warmer climates (e.g., Kuwait) show winter peaks associated with outdoor activity. Some studies found correlations with temperature, light, and atmospheric pressure, while others reported no seasonal variation. Conclusions: RD seasonality reflects a complex interplay of environmental and behavioural factors. Future research should focus on standardised methodologies to clarify these relationships and inform preventative strategies.