Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe

Prof. Dr. Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2021 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSClaudio E. von Schacky
Claudio E. von Schacky
Nikolas WilhelmNikolas Wilhelm
Nikolas Wilhelm
VSValerie S. Schäfer
Valerie S. Schäfer
YLYannik Leonhardt
Yannik Leonhardt
FGFelix Gassert
Felix Gassert
AGAlexandra S. Gersing
Alexandra S. Gersing
A multitask deep learning model that provided classification of primary bone tumors on radiographs demonstrated performance that surpassed that of radiologic residents and was comparable with that ... Background An artificial intelligence model that assesses primary bone tumors on radiographs may assist in the diagnostic workflow. Purpose To develop a multitask deep learning (DL) model for simul...

14 June 2017 in JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KKKerstin Kessel
Kerstin Kessel
MVMarco Me Vogel
Marco Me Vogel
CKCarmen Kessel
Carmen Kessel
HBHenning Bier
Henning Bier
TBTilo Biedermann
Tilo Biedermann
SCStephanie Combs
Stephanie Combs
Mobile and tablet apps, ubiquitous and pervasive computing, wearable computing and domotics for health.

1 January 2021 in Journal of Orthopaedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ILIgor Lazic
Igor Lazic
CSChristian Scheele
Christian Scheele
FPFlorian Pohlig
Florian Pohlig
RERüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
CSChristian Suren
Christian Suren

1 June 2004 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RERüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
MSM. Siebert
M. Siebert
CBC. Bringmann
C. Bringmann
TVT. Vogl
T. Vogl
KEK.-H. Englmeier
K.-H. Englmeier
HGH. Graichen
H. Graichen

13 July 2018 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAndreas Toepfer
Andreas Toepfer
NHNorbert Harrasser
Norbert Harrasser
MRMaximiliane Recker
Maximiliane Recker
ULUlrich Lenze
Ulrich Lenze
FPFlorian Pohlig
Florian Pohlig
RERüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
Bone and soft tissue masses of the foot and ankle are not particularly rare but true neoplasia has to be strictly differentiated from pseudotumorous lesions. Diagnosis is often delayed as diagnostic errors are more common than in other regions. Awareness for this localization of musculoskeletal tumors is not very high and neoplasia is often not considered. The purpose of this study is to provide detailed information on the incidence and distribution patterns of foot and ankle tumors of a university tumor institute and propose a simple definition to facilitate comparison of future investigations. As part of a retrospective, single-centre study, the data of patients that were treated for foot and ankle tumors between June 1997 and December 2015 in a musculoskeletal tumor centre were analyzed regarding epidemiologic information, entity and localization. Included were all cases with a true tumor of the foot and ankle. Exclusion criteria were incomplete information on the patient or entity (e.g. histopathological diagnosis) and all pseudotumoral lesions. Out of 7487 musculoskeletal tumors, 413 cases (5,52%) of tumors of the foot and ankle in 409 patients were included (215 male and 198 female patients). The average age of the affected patients was 36 ± 18y (min.3y, max.92y). Two hundred sixty-six tumors involved the bone (64%), among them 231 (87%) benign and 35 (13%) malignant. There were 147 soft tissue tumors (36%), 104 (71%) were benign, 43 (29%) malignant. The most common benign osseous tumor lesions included simple bone cysts, enchondroma and osteochondroma. By far the most common malignant bone tumor was chondrosarcoma. Common benign soft tissue tumors included pigmented villo-nodular synovitis, superifcial fibromatosis and schwannoma whereas the most common malignant members were synovial sarcoma and myxofibrosarcoma. Regarding anatomical localization, the hindfoot was affected most often. Knowledge of incidence and distribution patterns of foot and ankle tumors will help to correctly assess unclear masses and initiate the right steps in further diagnostics and treatment. Unawareness can lead to delayed diagnosis and inadequate treatment with serious consequences for the affected patient.

1 May 2015 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KHKonstantin Holzapfel
Konstantin Holzapfel
JRJennifer Regler
Jennifer Regler
TBThomas Baum
Thomas Baum
HRHans Rechl
Hans Rechl
KSKatja Specht
Katja Specht
KWKlaus Woertler
Klaus Woertler
To evaluate utility of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in local staging of soft-tissue sarcoma, with an emphasis on assessment of neurovascular encasement. Institutional review board approval was obtained; informed consent requirement was waived. Preoperative MR images in 174 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma were analyzed by two readers. Tumor staging according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer and Enneking staging systems and analysis of osseous and articular invasion were performed. To assess neurovascular encasement, contact between tumor and arteries, between tumor and veins, and between tumor and nerves was classified (no contact, contact ≤90°, 91°-180°, 181°-270°, >271°). Interobserver agreement was determined; imaging findings were correlated with intraoperative findings and/or histopathologic findings (Pearson correlation coefficient [r] and Cohen κ coefficient). Intraoperative evaluation and/or histopathologic evaluation confirmed osseous, articular, and neurovascular invasion in 8.6%, 2.9%, and 25.3% of patients. Interobserver agreement was excellent for tumor staging (American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer staging, κ = 0.811; Enneking staging, κ = 0.943) and osseous invasion (κ = 1.000). It was substantial for articular invasion (κ = 0.794). Sensitivity and specificity for osseous invasion were 100% and 98.7%, respectively (both readers). For articular invasion, sensitivity was 80% (both readers); specificities were 100% and 98.8% for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement in quantifying contact between tumor and vessels and between tumor and nerves was excellent for arteries, veins, and nerves (κ = 0.845, 0.892, 0.893, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed optimal threshold of greater than 180° for prediction of arterial and venous encasement (both readers). For neural encasement, optimal threshold was greater than 180° (reader 1) and greater than 270° (reader 2). Sensitivities in diagnosing encasement for arteries, veins, and nerves were 84.6%, 84.6%, and 77.8% (reader 1) and 84.6%, 84.6%, and 72.2% (reader 2). Specificities for encasement of arteries, veins, and nerves, respectively, were 97.5%, 97.5%, and 93.2% (reader 1) and 93.8%, 94.7%, 97.3% (reader 2). MR imaging allows reliable and accurate local staging of soft-tissue sarcoma. Encasement of arteries, veins, and nerves should be diagnosed, if the contact between tumor and vascular or neural circumference exceeds 180°.