Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising field in the era of personalized oncology due to its potential to save time and workforce while serving as a supportive tool in patient management decisions. Although several studies in the literature have explored the integration of AI into oncology practice across different tumor types, available data remain limited. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the role of AI in the management of complex cancer cases by comparing the decisions of an in-house tumor board and ChatGPT-4o for patients with various tumor types. Methods: A total of 102 patients with diverse cancer types were included. Treatment and follow-up decisions proposed by both the tumor board and ChatGPT-4o were independently evaluated by two medical oncologists using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Analysis of agreement levels showed high inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.722, p < 0.001 for tumor board decisions; κ = 0.794, p < 0.001 for ChatGPT decisions). However, concordance between the tumor board and ChatGPT was low, as reflected in the assessments of both raters (Rater 1: κ = 0.211, p = 0.003; Rater 2: κ = 0.376, p < 0.001). Both raters more frequently agreed with the tumor board decisions, and a statistically significant difference between tumor board and AI decisions was observed for both (Rater 1: Z = +4.548, p < 0.001; Rater 2: Z = +3.990, p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings suggest that AI, in its current form, is not yet capable of functioning as a standalone decision-maker in the management of challenging oncology cases. Clinical experience and expert judgment remain the most critical factors in guiding patient care.

Background: Metastatic gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer are associated with a poor prognosis. Recent advancements in treatment have incorporated trastuzumab, anti-PD-1 agents, and anti-claudin therapies alongside chemotherapy (ChT), significantly improving outcomes. Contemporary studies predominantly employ doublet ChT as the backbone for these regimens, although historically triplet ChT regimens have been favored, particularly in younger patients requiring rapid tumor shrinkage. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mFOLFOX-6 and mDCF regimens in the treatment of advanced GC and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Design: This was a retrospective multicenter study. Methods: Patient data were obtained from the databases of 25 hospitals across Turkey. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics were documented. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and group discrepancies were assessed with log-rank test. Results: A total of 493 patients were included in the analysis, with similar baseline characteristics between the two groups. The objective response rate was 36.3% in the mDCF group and 38% in the mFOLFOX-6 group ( p = 0.7). The median PFS was 6 months for mDCF and 7 months for mFOLFOX-6 ( p = 0.2), while the median OS was 12 months for mDCF and 11 months for mFOLFOX-6 ( p = 0.4). Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 27.6% of patients treated with mDCF versus 17.8% with mFOLFOX-6 ( p = 0.01). Likewise, grade 3–4 anemia was more frequent in the mDCF group (9.5%) compared to the mFOLFOX-6 group (4.8%; p = 0.04). Conclusion: Modified FOLFOX-6 demonstrated comparable efficacy to mDCF in the treatment of advanced GC and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Moreover, mFOLFOX-6 was associated with a lower incidence of hematological adverse effects.

Background and Objectives: Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is a rare and aggressive mucosal melanoma with a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity and nonspecific clinical presentation, diagnosis is often delayed, and prognostic data remain limited. Methods: In this retrospective study, 17 patients diagnosed with ARMM were identified from a cohort of 404 malignant melanoma cases treated at our center; however, only 14 patients with complete clinical and pathological data were included in the final analysis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathological data were collected. Disease stage, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, and potential prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 58 ± 12 years, and six patients (42.9%) were female. The median follow-up duration was 13.3 months, and the median OS was 12.6 months. Six patients (42.9%) were initially misdiagnosed due to overlapping symptoms with benign anorectal conditions. At presentation, seven patients had localized disease, while six had distant metastases. Univariate analysis identified male sex and liver metastasis as adverse prognostic factors for OS; however, these associations were not statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: ARMM is associated with poor survival outcomes, and liver metastasis and male sex may be linked to worse prognosis. Diagnostic delay is common due to nonspecific symptoms and frequent initial misdiagnosis, highlighting the need for increased clinical awareness. Further large-scale studies are warranted to better define prognostic markers and optimize management strategies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, is widely used in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet immune thrombocytopenia remains a rare but potentially fatal complication. We report a case of a 55-year-old male with metastatic NSCLC who developed pembrolizumab-associated immune thrombocytopenia. The patient initially responded well to combination therapy with pembrolizumab, carboplatin, and pemetrexed, achieving a metabolic complete response. However, after several cycles, he experienced recurrent grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Immune thrombocytopenia was suspected and managed with corticosteroids, leading to platelet recovery. Upon pembrolizumab rechallenge, thrombocytopenia recurred, necessitating permanent discontinuation of pembrolizumab while continuing pemetrexed maintenance. This case underscores the need for early recognition and prompt management of ICI-induced thrombocytopenia to ensure patient safety while optimizing oncologic outcomes.

Introduction: Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor agent used in the treatment of hepatocellular, renal, and thyroid cancers. The development of heart failure after cabozantinib initiation is an extremely rare side effect, with only four case reports published in the literature. We describe a case of cabozantinib-induced cardiac failure in a patient with thyroid cancer refractory to standard treatment. Case report: Fifty-seven-year-old woman had no history of cardiovascular disease. Echocardiography prior to chemotherapy revealed normal cardiac function. However, she developed pretibial edema and shortness of breath after 2 months of cabozantinib treatment. Ejection fraction was found to be 30% in the echocardiography of the patient, and global hypokinesia was detected in cardiac functions. Management and outcome: Cabozantinib treatment of the patient was discontinued. After discontinuation of treatment, the patient's cardiac functions did not return to normal. Heart failure due to cabozantinib treatment was thought to be permanent. Discussion: There are only four cases on this subject in the literature. Although the use of cabozantinib rarely causes heart failure, this side effect can have extremely serious consequences. Even if it is a rare condition, cardiological evaluations should be performed before and after cabozantinib therapy because it can be reversible after discontinuation of the treatment.