Pierluigi Paris

Dr. Pierluigi Paris

Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri (IRET), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via G. Marconi, 2 -05010 Porano (Tr), Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2006 in Agroforestry Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MEMarkus Eichhorn
Markus Eichhorn
Pierluigi ParisPierluigi Paris
Pierluigi Paris
FHFelix Herzog
Felix Herzog
LIL. D. Incoll
L. D. Incoll
FLF. Liagre
F. Liagre
CDC. Dupraz
C. Dupraz

1 April 2019 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSonja Kay
Sonja Kay
CRCarlo Rega
Carlo Rega
GMGerardo Moreno
Gerardo Moreno
MHMichael Den Herder
Michael Den Herder
JPJoão H.N. Palma
João H.N. Palma
FHFelix Herzog
Felix Herzog

1 April 2011 in Biomass and Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pierluigi ParisPierluigi Paris
Pierluigi Paris
LMLeonardo Mareschi
Leonardo Mareschi
MSMaurizio Sabatti
Maurizio Sabatti
APAndrea Pisanelli
Andrea Pisanelli
AEAlfredo Ecosse
Alfredo Ecosse
GSGiuseppe Scarascia-Mugnozza
Giuseppe Scarascia-Mugnozza

1 November 2014 in Industrial Crops and Products
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMaurizio Sabatti
Maurizio Sabatti
FFFrancesco Fabbrini
Francesco Fabbrini
AHAntoine Harfouche
Antoine Harfouche
IBIsacco Beritognolo
Isacco Beritognolo
LMLeonardo Mareschi
Leonardo Mareschi
GSGiuseppe Scarascia-Mugnozza
Giuseppe Scarascia-Mugnozza

14 January 2019 in Agroforestry Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pierluigi ParisPierluigi Paris
Pierluigi Paris
FCFrancesca Camilli
Francesca Camilli
ARAdolfo Rosati
Adolfo Rosati
AMAlberto Mantino
Alberto Mantino
GMGiustino Mezzalira
Giustino Mezzalira
Paul BurgessPaul Burgess
Paul Burgess
The successful promotion of agroforestry in Italy depends on both a recognition of tradition and the opportunities for innovation. In Italy, agroforestry has traditionally been a key component of landscape management. Complex systems, based on the integration among crops–livestock–fruit/forest trees, provided a wide variety of products (e.g. food, feed, fibers, fuelwood and timber) and other ecosystem services (e.g. soil erosion control and biodiversity preservation). Silvopastoral systems have been used for centuries and are still managed in marginal areas. The integration of fruits trees (in primis olive trees) with crops and grazing was widely practiced and is still profitable. Coltura promiscua was historically developed integrating fruit and forest trees and particularly multifunctional trees (e.g. Juglans regia L. and Prunus avium L.) to support vines and intercrops. Building on recent research, projects have also focused on innovation in agroforestry. The adoption of shade tolerant forage species and crops has been studied in silvopastoral and olive systems. Silvopastoral systems can significantly offset the greenhouse gas emissions produced by livestock and shield grazing animals from “heat waves”. Integration of fast growing timber trees (like Populus) in arable systems can help reverse the decline in plantation forestry in Italy. Finally, the constraints imposed by the EU agricultural policy, especially the prevalent provisions for monocrops severely limiting the introduction of innovative agroforestry approaches, are discussed. New political measures and certification actions are strongly required.

28 June 2020 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLaura Cumplido-Marin
Laura Cumplido-Marin
AGAnil Robert Graves
Anil Robert Graves
Paul BurgessPaul Burgess
Paul Burgess
CMChristopher Morhart
Christopher Morhart
Pierluigi ParisPierluigi Paris
Pierluigi Paris
MNMichael Nahm
Michael Nahm
Current global temperature increases resulting from human activity threaten many ecosystems and societies, and have led to international and national policy commitments that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Bioenergy crops provide one means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy production and two novel crops that could be used for this purpose are Sida hermaphrodita (L.) Rusby and Silphium perfoliatum L. This research examined the existing scientific literature available on both crops through a systematic review. The data were collated according to the agronomy, uses, and environmental benefits of each crop. Possible challenges were associated with high initial planting costs, low yields in low rainfall areas, and for Sida hermaphrodita, vulnerability to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. However, under appropriate environmental conditions, both crops were found to provide large yields over sustained periods of time with relatively low levels of management and could be used to produce large energy surpluses, either through direct combustion or biogas production. Other potential uses included fodder, fibre, and pharmaceutical uses. Environmental benefits included the potential for phytoremediation, and improvements to soil health, biodiversity, and pollination. The review also demonstrated that environmental benefits, such as pollination, soil health, and water quality benefits could be obtained from the use of Sida hermaphrodita and Silphium perfoliatum relative to existing bioenergy crops such as maize, whilst at the same time reducing the greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy production. Future research should examine the long-term implications of using Sida hermaphrodita and Silphium perfoliatum as well as improve knowledge on how to integrate them successfully within existing farming systems and supply chains.