Anil Robert Graves

Dr. Anil Robert Graves


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LRLucy E. Ridding
Lucy E. Ridding
JRJohn W. Redhead
John W. Redhead
TOTom Oliver
Tom Oliver
RSReto Schmucki
Reto Schmucki
JMJames McGinlay
James McGinlay
JBJames Bullock
James Bullock
The importance of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) to human wellbeing is widely recognised. However, quantifying these non-material benefits is challenging and consequently they are often not assessed. Mapping approaches are increasingly being used to understand the spatial distribution of different CES and how this relates to landscape characteristics. This study uses an online Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) to elicit information on outdoor locations important to respondents in Wiltshire, a dynamic lowland landscape in southern England. We analysed these locations in a GIS with spatial datasets representing potential influential factors, including protected areas, land use, landform, and accessibility. We assess these characteristics at different spatial and visual scales for different types of cultural engagement. We find that areas that are accessible, near to urban centres, with larger views, and a high diversity of protected habitats, are important for the delivery of CES. Other characteristics including a larger area of woodland and the presence of sites of historic interest in the surrounding landscape were also influential. These findings have implications for land-use planning and the management of ecosystems, by demonstrating the benefits of high quality ecological sites near to towns. The importance of maintaining and restoring landscape features, such as woodlands, to enhance the delivery of CES were also highlighted.

28 June 2020 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLaura Cumplido-Marin
Laura Cumplido-Marin
AGAnil Robert Graves
Anil Robert Graves
Paul BurgessPaul Burgess
Paul Burgess
CMChristopher Morhart
Christopher Morhart
Pierluigi ParisPierluigi Paris
Pierluigi Paris
MNMichael Nahm
Michael Nahm
Current global temperature increases resulting from human activity threaten many ecosystems and societies, and have led to international and national policy commitments that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Bioenergy crops provide one means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy production and two novel crops that could be used for this purpose are Sida hermaphrodita (L.) Rusby and Silphium perfoliatum L. This research examined the existing scientific literature available on both crops through a systematic review. The data were collated according to the agronomy, uses, and environmental benefits of each crop. Possible challenges were associated with high initial planting costs, low yields in low rainfall areas, and for Sida hermaphrodita, vulnerability to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. However, under appropriate environmental conditions, both crops were found to provide large yields over sustained periods of time with relatively low levels of management and could be used to produce large energy surpluses, either through direct combustion or biogas production. Other potential uses included fodder, fibre, and pharmaceutical uses. Environmental benefits included the potential for phytoremediation, and improvements to soil health, biodiversity, and pollination. The review also demonstrated that environmental benefits, such as pollination, soil health, and water quality benefits could be obtained from the use of Sida hermaphrodita and Silphium perfoliatum relative to existing bioenergy crops such as maize, whilst at the same time reducing the greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy production. Future research should examine the long-term implications of using Sida hermaphrodita and Silphium perfoliatum as well as improve knowledge on how to integrate them successfully within existing farming systems and supply chains.

5 December 2014 in Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FSFiresenai Sereke
Firesenai Sereke
AGAnil Robert Graves
Anil Robert Graves
DDDunja Dux
Dunja Dux
JPJoao H. N. Palma
Joao H. N. Palma
FHFelix Herzog
Felix Herzog

25 December 2010 in Agroforestry Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAnil Robert Graves
Anil Robert Graves
Paul BurgessPaul Burgess
Paul Burgess
FLF. Liagre
F. Liagre
JTJ.-P. Terreaux
J.-P. Terreaux
TBT. Borrel
T. Borrel
FHF. Herzog
F. Herzog

7 November 2008
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
AGAnil Robert Graves
Anil Robert Graves
Paul BurgessPaul Burgess
Paul Burgess
FLF. Liagre
F. Liagre
APA. Pisanelli
A. Pisanelli
PPP. Paris
P. Paris
CDC. Dupraz
C. Dupraz

16 September 2017 in Agroforestry Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJ. H. N. Palma
J. H. N. Palma
JCJ. Crous-Duran
J. Crous-Duran
AGAnil Robert Graves
Anil Robert Graves
Silvestre García de JalónSilvestre García de Jalón
Silvestre García de Jalón
MUM. Upson
M. Upson
Paul BurgessPaul Burgess
Paul Burgess
Agroforestry combines perennial woody elements (e.g. trees) with an agricultural understory (e.g. wheat, pasture) which can also potentially be used by a livestock component. In recent decades, modern agroforestry systems have been proposed at European level as land use alternatives for conventional agricultural systems. The potential range of benefits that modern agroforestry systems can provide includes farm product diversification (food and timber), soil and biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and the soil. Whilst typically these include benefits such as food and timber provision, potentially, there are benefits in the form of carbon sequestration, both in woody biomass and in the soil. Quantifying the effect of agroforestry systems on soil carbon is important because it is one means by which atmospheric carbon can be sequestered in order to reduce global warming. However, experimental systems that can combine the different alternative features of agroforestry systems are difficult to implement and long-term. For this reason, models are needed to explore these alternatives, in order to determine what benefits different combinations of trees and understory might provide in agroforestry systems. This paper describes the integration of the widely used soil carbon model RothC, a model simulating soil organic carbon turnover, into Yield-SAFE, a parameter sparse model to estimate aboveground biomass in agroforestry systems. The improvement of the Yield-SAFE model focused on the estimation of input plant material into soil (i.e. leaf fall and root mortality) while maintaining the original aspiration for a simple conceptualization of agroforestry modeling, but allowing to feed inputs to a soil carbon module based on RothC. Validation simulations show that the combined model gives predictions consistent with observed data for both SOC dynamics and tree leaf fall. Two case study systems are examined: a cork oak system in South Portugal and a poplar system in the UK, in current and future climate.