Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved cancer treatment, a substantial proportion of patients do not benefit from these therapies, revealing the crucial need to identify reliable biomarkers. Inflammatory markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and C-reactive protein (CRP), may provide insights into treatment outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of multiple inflammatory markers in patients with cancer receiving ICI-based therapies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 226 patients treated with ICI-based therapies at a single center between 2012 and 2023. The inflammatory markers NLR, PIV, SII, SIRI, LDH, CRP, and albumin were assessed. Cut-off values were determined using maximally selected rank statistics, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Results: High NLR, PIV, SII, SIRI, LDH, and CRP, as well as low albumin levels, were associated with worse OS and PFS (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, high CRP, LDH, NLR, PIV, and SII independently predicted worse OS. Conclusions: Our findings confirm the prognostic utility of several inflammatory biomarkers in patients with cancer receiving ICIs, highlighting their potential for treatment stratification. Further studies are necessary to standardize cut-off values and validate these findings across broader, more diverse populations.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although the STRIDE regimen (durvalumab plus tremelimumab) has demonstrated an overall survival benefit in clinical trials, real-world evidence remains limited, particularly in Turkish clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of first-line STRIDE therapy in patients with unresectable HCC treated in routine clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study including patients with unresectable HCC who received first-line durvalumab plus tremelimumab through the Turkish national Early Access Program across 18 oncology centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and exploratory Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate baseline prognostic factors. Results: Thirty-two patients were included. The median PFS was 7.25 months (95% CI, 3.68–22.29), and the median OS was 11.43 months (95% CI, 4.50–not reached). The underlying liver disease etiology was non-viral in 53.1% of patients, hepatitis B virus in 40.6%, and hepatitis C virus in 6.3%. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in fewer than 10% of patients. Conclusions: In this multicenter real-world cohort, first-line durvalumab plus tremelimumab appeared to be a feasible treatment option and was generally well tolerated in patients with unresectable HCC. However, given the retrospective design, small sample size, and absence of a control group, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in larger prospective comparative studies.

Background and Objectives: Neoadjuvant dual HER2 blockade combined with chemotherapy is the standard treatment approach for patients with high-risk early-stage or locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. However, the optimal chemotherapy backbone and the predictive value of systemic inflammatory biomarkers remain subjects of ongoing investigation. This study aimed to compare pathologic complete response (pCR) rates between neoadjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab (ddAC+THP) and docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (TCHP), and to evaluate the predictive performance of pretreatment inflammatory biomarkers. Materials and Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant ddAC+THP or TCHP between 2019 and 2025 at three tertiary centers were evaluated. Pretreatment inflammatory biomarkers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score, were calculated from baseline laboratory parameters. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to determine optimal cutoff values, and logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of pCR. Results: A total of 197 patients were included, of whom 138 received ddAC+THP and 59 received TCHP. Overall, 125 patients (63.5%) achieved pCR. The pCR rate was numerically higher in the ddAC+THP group than in the TCHP group (65.2% vs. 59.3%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.431). Among the evaluated biomarkers, SIRI demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance for predicting pCR (AUC: 0.725, 95% CI: 0.652–0.797), followed by NLR (AUC: 0.673, 95% CI: 0.595–0.750). In multivariable analysis, hormone receptor positivity (OR: 0.291, 95% CI: 0.131–0.645; p = 0.002) and elevated SIRI (>0.845) (OR: 0.088, 95% CI: 0.036–0.216; p < 0.001) were independently associated with lower odds of achieving pCR. No significant difference in pCR was observed between treatment regimens across predefined subgroup analyses. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ddAC+THP and TCHP achieved comparable pCR outcomes in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. SIRI was independently associated with a lower likelihood of achieving pCR and showed acceptable discriminatory performance. These findings suggest that SIRI may represent an exploratory, readily available inflammatory biomarker for pCR risk stratification; however, prospective validation is required before clinical application.

Backround:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common neoplasm to cause death. First line treatment options are still challenging for HCC. STRIDE regimen (durvalumab/tremelimumab) showed improved median overall survival (OS) rates however did not make differ significantly in median progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Method:We reviewed outcomes of patients with HCC who initiated durval-umab/tremelimumab between 2020 and 2024, across 18 institutions. OS and PFS were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox models, adjusting for baseline characteris-tics. Results: A total of 32 patients were included in the study. Median PFS was was 7,25 months (%95 confidence interval (CI) 3,68-22,29) and the median OS was 11,43 months (%95 CI 4,5-NA). Non-viral, HBV and HCV constituted to etiology was re-spectively %53,1, %40,6 and %6,3 of patients. Grade ≥ 3 advers events were found less than %10 of populations. Conclusions: This real world retrospective study showed that STRIDE regimen was effective and safety for HCC in first line.

Graves' disease (GD) may rarely present with hematologic findings and hepatic dysfunction. Diagnosis may be difficult, but early diagnosis is important to avoid delays in treatment. According to a recent literature review, the association of pancytopenia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and hepatic dysfunction in GD has not been reported before. We report the case of a 57-year-old woman admitted to the intensive care unit with symptoms of heart failure and diagnosed as GD with pancytopenia, AIHA and impaired liver function tests. Corticosteroid and anti-thyroid treatment was initiated and clinical and laboratory findings improved within the first week. Pancytopenia, AIHA and hepatic dysfunction may occur as the first manifestation of the disease or may be seen in the course of Graves' disease. The occurrence of these severe findings is very rare and respond well to treatment.