Hematological emergencies are critical medical conditions that require immediate attention due to their rapid progression and life-threatening nature. As various examples, hypercalcemia, often associated with cancers such as multiple myeloma, can lead to severe neurological and cardiac dysfunction. Hyperleukocytosis, common in acute myeloid leukemias, increases the risk of leukostasis and multiorgan failure. Sickle cell crisis, a common complication in sickle cell disease, results from vaso-occlusion, leading to acute pain and tissue ischemia. Tumor lysis syndrome, reported in cases of rapid destruction of cancer cells, causes electrolyte imbalances and acute kidney injury. Acute transfusion reactions, fundamental in hematological conditions, can range from mild allergic responses to severe hemolysis and shock, requiring prompt management. Disseminated intravascular coagulation, involving excessive coagulation and bleeding, is commonly triggered by hematological malignancies, common in the first phases of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Recently, in the era of bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, cytokine release syndrome is a manifestation that must be recognized and promptly treated. Understanding the pathophysiology, recognizing the clinical manifestations, and ensuring adequate diagnostic strategies and management approaches for each condition are central to early intervention in improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality.

Tetraspanin 32 (TSPAN32), a member of the tetraspanin superfamily, is one of several tumor-suppressing subtransferable fragments located in the imprinted gene domain of chromosome 11p15.5, a critical tumor-suppressor gene region. Although the biology of TSPAN32 remains largely unexplored, accumulating evidence suggests its involvement in hematopoietic functions. In this study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the expression patterns and regulatory roles of TSPAN32. Notably, TSPAN32 is highly expressed in immune cells, particularly in natural killer (NK) cells and CD8+ T cells. The observed downregulation of TSPAN32 during immune cell activation highlights its potential role as a regulator of immune cell activation and metabolic adaptations, which are crucial for effective immune responses against pathogens and tumors. Moreover, the modulation of biological processes following TSPAN32 knockout further supports its critical role in regulating immune cell physiology and responses. These findings not only shed light on the biology of TSPAN32 but also provide the basis for exploring its diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic potential in autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, as well as in hematopoietic cancers.

Therapeutic phlebotomy remains a key intervention in the management of erythrocytosis and iron overload disorders, particularly polycythemia vera (PV) and hereditary hemochromatosis. Despite its historical origins as an ancient practice, venesection continues to be recommended in international guidelines for the reduction of hematocrit and iron burden, thereby mitigating thrombotic and organ-related complications. However, the evolving landscape of targeted pharmacologic therapies is reshaping the therapeutic paradigm. This review examines the current role of therapeutic phlebotomy, with a particular focus on PV, outlining its physiological rationale, clinical benefits, and well-documented limitations—including iron deficiency, procedural burden, and incomplete hematocrit control between sessions. Comparative insights are provided between phlebotomy and red cell apheresis, highlighting differences in efficacy, tolerability, and accessibility. The emergence of disease-modifying agents—such as interferons, JAK inhibitors, hepcidin mimetics, and epigenetic modulators like givinostat and bomedemstat—promises more sustained hematologic control with the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for repeated phlebotomies. While phlebotomy remains indispensable in early-stage or low-risk PV, its future utility will likely shift toward complementary or bridge therapy in the context of individualized, pharmacologically driven strategies, redefining the role of phlebotomy in the era of precision medicine.

Background/Objectives: The combination of venetoclax (VEN) and hypomethylating agents (HMA), such as azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC), has transformed the treatment landscape for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. However, optimal management of neutropenia and the impact of post-remission treatment interruptions (washouts) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of post-remission washouts and their effect on clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 44 AML patients treated with HMA/VEN between 2020 and 2021. Clinical, molecular, and treatment-related data were collected, including treatment duration, post-remission washout duration, response rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Statistical analyses included Fisher’s exact test and univariate and multivariate Cox models. Results: Overall, 61% of patients responded to therapy, with significantly higher response rates among those potentially eligible for the VIALE-A trial (86% vs. 39%, p = 0.002). Neither treatment duration nor post-remission washout length was associated with DFS or OS. DFS was significantly longer in patients treated with AZA compared to DEC (p = 0.006). Median OS was 7.7 months, with longer OS observed in patients who met VIALE-A trial eligibility criteria (p = 0.021). Achieving complete remission (CR) was associated with improved OS (14.5 months). Conclusions: Post-remission treatment interruptions (washouts) did not negatively impact DFS or OS, suggesting they may be a safe strategy to support hematologic recovery. However, the choice of HMA appears to influence response duration, with AZA outperforming DEC in maintaining disease control.

Background: Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) remains a therapeutic challenge due to disease heterogeneity, resistance mechanisms, and poor tolerability to intensive regimens. Venetoclax (VEN), a BCL-2 inhibitor, has shown promise in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), but data on response timing in the R/R setting are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and kinetics of response to HMA-VEN therapy in a real-world cohort of R/R AML patients, with particular focus on early versus late responders. Methods: This prospective single-center study included 33 adult patients with R/R AML treated with VEN plus either azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC) from 2018 to 2021. The primary endpoint was the composite complete remission (cCR) rate and the rate of early and late response, respectively, occurring within two cycles of therapy or later; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), time to relapse (TTR), and safety. Results: The cCR was 58%, with complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) achieved in 52% of patients. Median OS was 9 months. No significant differences in OS or TTR were observed between early (≤2 cycles) and late (>2 cycles) responders. Eight responders (42%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with comparable transplant rates in both groups of responders. Toxicity was manageable. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in all patients, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 44% of patients. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score >2 was associated with inferior response and shorter treatment duration. Conclusions: HMA-VEN therapy is effective and safe in R/R AML, including for patients with delayed responses. The absence of a prognostic disadvantage for late responders supports flexible treatment schedules and suggests that the continuation of therapy may be beneficial even without early blast clearance. Tailored approaches based on performance status and comorbidities are warranted, and future studies should incorporate minimal residual disease (MRD)-based monitoring to refine response assessment.

Background: Immune system impairment is frequently reported in patients affected by hemoglobinopathies due to various mechanisms, including iron accumulation, antigenic stimulation due to numerous transfusions, chronic hemolysis, and a general hyperinflammatory state. For these reasons, the antigenic immune response after a vaccine risks being ineffective. Methods: We evaluated the anti-spike IgG production after two doses of vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in patients affected by hemoglobinopathies. Results: All 114 enrolled patients (100%) developed adequate antibody production, with a median value of serum IgG of 2184.4 BAU/mL (IQR 1127.4–3502.9). The amount of antibody was unrelated to any other clinical characteristics evaluated, including transfusion dependence or non-transfusion dependence, age, gender, disease type, ferritin, blood count, spleen status, and therapy with hydroxyurea or iron chelators (in all the cases p > 0.05). Moreover, 47 (41.2%) patients developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first 2 years of follow-up after vaccination, all with a mildly symptomatic course, without requiring hospitalization or experiencing a significative drop in hemoglobin values, allowing for a slight delay in their transfusion regimen. Conclusion: Vaccination against COVID-19 is safe and effective for patients affected by hemoglobinopathies, ensuring adequate protection from severe infection.