A 52-year-old female patient was diagnosed with chronic periapical periodontitis associated with severely calcified lower central incisors. Radiographic examination revealed no visible root canal in the coronal-third of the root. After choosing the guided endodontic treatment, an intraoral scan (Trios, 3shape, Copenhagen, Denmark), in conjunction with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan, was taken in order to design and fabricate a printed guide. Virtual implant software was used to visualize the surgical access into the sclerosed root canals. After locating the canals, the guide was removed, and the teeth were treated under a rubber dam. The guided approach allows predictable, efficient endodontic treatment of teeth presenting calcified canals, with minimal removal of sound dentine and less risk of root perforations.

Background: Accuracy of optical impressions—defined by the intraoral scanner (IOS)’s trueness and precision per International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards—is influenced by both operator- and patient-related factors. Thus, this in vitro study aimed to (1) evaluate how scanning distance affects the accuracy of three different intraoral scanners (IOSs), and (2) identify the optimal scanning distance for each scanner. Methods: A maxillary arch model was obtained using polyvinyl siloxane impression material and poured with Type IV stone (Octa-rock royal^®, Kulzer, Germany). Using three different types of IOSs—the trios 3 shape (TRIOS ^® cart, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark); the Helios 500 (Eighteeth ^®, Changzhou, China); and the Heron (3Disc ^®, Herndon, VA 20170, USA)—ten scans were performed with each of the IOSs with five predetermined distances: 0 mm, 2.5 mm, 5 mm, 7.5 mm, and 10 mm. Spacers of varying heights were designed using Meshmixer version 3.5 (Autodesk, Inc., Mill Valley, CA, USA) and three-dimensional printed with the Form 2 printer (Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA). The scanned data was processed using Geomagic Control X (Version 16.0.2.16496, 3D Systems, Wilsonville, OR, USA). Statistical analyses were performed using R Statistical Software (version 4.2.2), with significance set at α = 0.05. Results: Scanning distance significantly influenced scan accuracy for all three scanners. The 3Disc scanner (3Disc, Herndon, VA, USA) demonstrated the highest accuracy at a 7.5 mm distance, while both the Helios 500 (Eighteeth, Changzhou, China) and Trios 3 (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) scanners achieved their best accuracy at a 5 mm distance, as indicated by the lowest root mean square (RMS) values (p < 0.05). Conclusions: To conclude, each IOS has an optimal scanning distance for best accuracy. Trios 3 (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) outperformed the others in both trueness and precision. Future studies should examine these effects under full-arch and clinical conditions.

Introduction: Stainless Steel Crowns (SSC) are not easily replaced by Zirconia Prefabricated Crowns (ZPC) because of their adaptation problem and risk of fracture and loosening. Objectives: To assess and compare the trueness of milled zirconia and milled hybrid ceramic crowns designed for primary teeth restoration to a digitally designed file. Methods: The fourteen extracted primary molars were scanned using an intraoral scanner to obtain digital files of the teeth. The digital files were imported into the Design dental software (TDS) and used to design and mill zirconia and hybrid ceramic crowns using a 4-axis milling machine: 14 zirconia crowns and 14 hybrid ceramic crowns were milled. The milled crowns were fitted onto their corresponding primary molars and evaluated for trueness using Geomagic Control X Software (Control X®, Geomagic, Morrisville, NC, USA). The results were recorded in millimeters. Results: No significant difference was observed in terms of trueness between the milled zirconia crowns and the milled hybrid ceramic crowns (p>0.05). Conclusions: Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacture (CAD/CAM) technology and zirconia/ hybrid ceramic materials can be used effectively in the restoration of primary teeth. The use of the hybrid composite material in this technique provides a highly accurate, quick and esthetic solution for pediatric patients, which can improve their oral health and quality of life.

This case report describes a digital workflow for the aesthetic rehabilitation of a 30-year-old male patient with unaesthetic anterior teeth. The treatment incorporated AI-assisted smile design software (SmileCloud Biometrics) for 2D/3D digital planning and patient communication. Six lithium disilicate veneers (IPS e.max CAD) were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology following mock-up-guided minimally invasive preparation (0.2–0.9 mm reduction). The restorations were adhesively cemented under rubber dam isolation. One-week follow-up confirmed aesthetic integration, occlusal harmony, and patient satisfaction. This case illustrates how digital workflows with AI-assisted tools can support veneer rehabilitation through data-informed planning and conservative preparation while maintaining aesthetic outcomes.