Background/Objectives: There has been a lack of a holistic approach to evaluating antibiotic consumption in Kazakhstan over the past few years using an internationally recognized methodology. Therefore, this study aimed to provide a nationwide evaluation of antibiotic consumption in Kazakhstan during the period 2019–2023. Methods: Defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DIDs) were calculated for systemic antibiotics (J01 code of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC)) following the methodology established by the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS-AMC). The average annual percent change (AAPC) was computed for each chemical agent, pharmacological group, and J01 in general to evaluate past trends in antibiotic consumption. Results: The consumption of J01 antibiotics ranged between 10.869 DIDs (2022) and 14.470 DIDs (2020). There was an increase in antibiotic consumption during 2020 and 2021, but the overall trend was declining, with an AAPC of −2.45%. Azithromycin was the most consumed systemic antibiotic, followed by ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin. The consumption of “Watch” group antibiotics prevailed in Kazakhstan during the study period, with the number of people consuming the top five “Watch” group antibiotics rising from 72,578 in 2019 to 94,617 in 2023. Conclusions: The findings of this study are crucial for the reorganization of the national antimicrobial stewardship program.

Pleural malignancies represent a clinically devastating group of oncological disorders, most commonly arising from metastatic disease, with lung and breast cancers being the most frequent primary sites. Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a primary malignancy of the pleura and occurs less often than metastatic pleural disease. Pleural malignancies often present with malignant pleural effusion, which typically indicates advanced-stage disease and is associated with poor overall prognosis. Treatment of pleural malignancies includes both palliative and definitive approaches. Palliative interventions primarily aim to relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. Definitive treatments include systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, depending on the type and molecular profile of the underlying tumor. In mesothelioma, platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with pemetrexed remains the cornerstone of treatment, while the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab is recommended as first-line therapy for unresectable disease. For metastatic disease, systemic therapy is typically tailored to the primary tumor’s characteristics. Intrapleural administration of chemotherapeutic agents is one of the therapeutic strategies and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy and pressurized intrathoracic aerosol chemotherapy are the most recent innovations that are under active investigation. This review provides an up-to-date synthesis of systemic chemotherapy strategies for pleural malignancies, their integration with targeted and immune-based therapies, and recent advances in intrapleural chemotherapy modalities. It also explores existing knowledge gaps and outlines directions for future research and potential changes in clinical practice.

Cancers represent a significant global health burden, affecting millions of individuals each year

Background. The existing literature highlights a lack of comparative studies between subtypes of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and the impact of misclassification on the epidemiological parameters. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the surgical outcomes. The authors used Poisson regression with modified errors to calculate the risk ratios (RR) and reported post-estimation marginal effects. Coefficient estimates, variance inflation factors, and Pearson’s goodness-of-fit test statistics were used to check for multicollinearity and model fit, respectively. We also performed a reclassification analysis by modeling Klatskin tumors (PCC) as extrahepatic (ECC), reclassifying them as intrahepatic (ICC), and comparing the corresponding changes in estimates. Results. Regression analysis revealed an increased risk of death in patients with ICC (RR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.11–3.78) and PCC (RR = 2.03, 95% CI 0.97–4.24) compared to those with DCC. When PCC was analyzed as an ECC, the ICC revealed an RR of 1.52 (95% CI 0.84–2.73). Further reclassification of PCC showed an RR of 2.04 for ICC (95% CI: 1.53–3.53). The adjusted marginal effects saw a reduction in the death probability for both ICC and ECC. However, post hoc analyses revealed insufficient evidence for differences between the reclassified models. Conclusions. Patients with DCC had slightly better prognosis compared to ICC and PCC. We found no differences in survival between ICC and ECC (combining DCC and PCC). The decrease in mortality risk due to reclassification in both groups was not confirmed statistically. Future studies should focus on statistical evidence when referring to the Will Rogers phenomenon, instead of inferring from raw comparisons.