Kate Stewart

Mrs. Kate Stewart

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 December 2020 in Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMolly Mee
Molly Mee
KSKate Stewart
Kate Stewart
MLMarika Lathouras
Marika Lathouras
HTHelen Truong
Helen Truong
CHCatriona Hargrave
Catriona Hargrave
Introduction: A challenge in implementing deformable image registration (DIR) in radiation therapy planning is effectively communicating registration accuracy to the radiation oncologist. This study aimed to evaluate the MIM® quality assurance (QA) tool for rating DIR accuracy.Methods: Retrospective DIR was performed on CT images for 35 head and neck cancer patients. The QA tool was used to rate DIR accuracy as good, fair or bad. Thirty registered patient images were assessed independently by three RTs and a further five patients assessed by five RTs. Ratings were evaluated by comparison of Hausdorff Distance (HD), Mean Distance to Agreement (MDA), Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) and Jacobian determinants for parotid and mandible subregions on the two CTs post‐DIR. Inter‐operator reliability was assessed using Krippendorff's alpha coefficient (KALPA). Rating time and volume measures for each rating were also calculated.Results: Quantitative metrics calculated for most anatomical subregions reflected the expected trend by registration accuracy, with good obtaining the most ideal values on average (HD = 7.50 ± 3.18, MDA = 0.64 ± 0.47, DSC = 0.90 ± 0.07, Jacobian = 0.95 ± 0.06). Highest inter‐operator reliability was observed for good ratings and within the parotids (KALPA 0.66–0.93), whilst ratings varied the most in regions of dental artefact. Overall, average rating time was 33 minutes and the least commonly applied rating by volume was fair.Conclusion: Results from qualitative and quantitative data, operator rating differences and rating time suggest highlighting only bad regions of DIR accuracy and implementing clinical guidelines and RT training for consistent and efficient use of the QA tool.

4 December 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGeorges Mehawed
Georges Mehawed
MRMatthew J Roberts
Matthew J Roberts
JBJessica Bugeja
Jessica Bugeja
JDJason Dowling
Jason Dowling
KSKate Stewart
Kate Stewart
RMRebecca Murray
Rebecca Murray
Introduction: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT), in combination with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may enhance the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Image fusion of separately acquired PET/CT and MRI images serve to facilitate clinical integration and treatment planning. This study aimed to investigate different PSMA PET/CT and MRI image fusion workflows for prostate cancer visualisation. Methods: Eighteen patients with prostate cancer who underwent PSMA PET/CT and MRI prior to radical prostatectomy were retrospectively selected. Alignment of the prostate was performed between PET/CT and MRI via three techniques: semi-automatic rigid, automatic rigid, and automatic non-rigid. Image fusion accuracy was evaluated through boundary and volume agreement, quantified by the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD), and Mean Surface Distance (MSD), with comparison against reconstructed histopathology slices. Results: Image fusion using all techniques resulted in clear lesion visualisation from PSMA PET/CT overlay and anatomical detail afforded by the MRI base and was consistent with histopathology tumour location. Image fusion accuracy was within the recommended range based on a DSC of 0.8–0.9. The automatic non-rigid registration method had the highest volume agreement (DSC: 0.96 ± <0.01) and boundary agreement (HD: 1.17 ± 0.35 mm) when compared to automatic rigid (DSC 0.88 ± 0.02, HD 3.18 ± 0.29 mm) and semi-automatic rigid (DSC 0.80 ± 0.06, HD 5.25 ± 1.68 mm). Conclusions: Image fusion of clinically obtained PET/CT and MRI is feasible and clinically acceptable for use in prostate cancer diagnosis and surgical management. While the best accuracy was observed with the automatic non-rigid technique, which requires further validation, image fusion with clinically accessible methods (semi-automatic rigid) may currently aid patient education, pre-operative planning, and intra-operative guidance.

1 January 2009
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
MLMary Beth Landrum
Mary Beth Landrum
KSKate Stewart
Kate Stewart
DCDavid M. Cutler
David M. Cutler
This chapter concentrates on the clinical pathway to disability from specific medical conditions. It assesses the link of specific diseases and conditions with varying types and severity of disability to better understand the association between medical conditions and the disablement process. Stroke exacerbated the effects of both diabetes and heart failure in disability in complex tasks. Dementia is considered as a leading precursor to disability. Women were more likely than men to report new disabilities in mobility and self-care tasks, but not with complex tasks. Stroke, heart disease, and arthritis are amenable to both medical and lifestyle interventions. The analyses of newly disabled respondents attributing their disability to old age or symptoms indicate a greater focus on physician-based assessment of preclinical disease and treatment of symptoms in order to prevent disability.

2 August 2026
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
SCScott B. Crowe
Scott B. Crowe
JWJemma Walsh
Jemma Walsh
CBCatharine Bennett
Catharine Bennett
CBCatherine S. Bettington
Catherine S. Bettington
PCPhilip Chan
Philip Chan
TKTanya Kairn
Tanya Kairn

2 January 1993
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
KSKate Stewart
Kate Stewart