Marco B. Ancona

Dr. Marco B. Ancona

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 June 2020 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGiulio G Stefanini
Giulio G Stefanini
MMMatteo Montorfano
Matteo Montorfano
Daniela TrabattoniDaniela Trabattoni
Daniela Trabattoni
DADaniele Andreini
Daniele Andreini
GFGiuseppe Ferrante
Giuseppe Ferrante
ACAlaide Chieffo
Alaide Chieffo

12 January 2021 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMatheus Simonato
Matheus Simonato
BWBrian Whisenant
Brian Whisenant
HRHenrique Ribeiro
Henrique Ribeiro
JWJohn G. Webb
John G. Webb
RKRan Kornowski
Ran Kornowski
DDDanny Dvir
Danny Dvir
Background: Mitral valve-in-valve (ViV) and valve-in-ring (ViR) are alternatives to surgical reoperation in patients with recurrent mitral valve failure after previous surgical valve repair or replacement. Our aim was to perform a large-scale analysis examining midterm outcomes after mitral ViV and ViR. Methods: Patients undergoing mitral ViV and ViR were enrolled in the Valve-in-Valve International Data Registry. Cases were performed between March 2006 and March 2020. Clinical endpoints are reported according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) definitions. Significant residual mitral stenosis (MS) was defined as mean gradient ≥10 mm Hg and significant residual mitral regurgitation (MR) as ≥ moderate. Results: A total of 1079 patients (857 ViV, 222 ViR; mean age 73.5±12.5 years; 40.8% male) from 90 centers were included. Median STS-PROM score 8.6%; median clinical follow-up 492 days (interquartile range, 76–996); median echocardiographic follow-up for patients that survived 1 year was 772.5 days (interquartile range, 510–1211.75). Four-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 62.5% in ViV versus 49.5% for ViR ( P <0.001). Mean gradient across the mitral valve postprocedure was 5.7±2.8 mm Hg (≥5 mm Hg; 61.4% of patients). Significant residual MS occurred in 8.2% of the ViV and 12.0% of the ViR patients ( P =0.09). Significant residual MR was more common in ViR patients (16.6% versus 3.1%; P <0.001) and was associated with lower survival at 4 years (35.1% versus 61.6%; P =0.02). The rates of Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium–defined device success were low for both procedures (39.4% total; 32.0% ViR versus 41.3% ViV; P =0.01), mostly related to having postprocedural mean gradient ≥5 mm Hg. Correlates for residual MS were smaller true internal diameter, younger age, and larger body mass index. The only correlate for residual MR was ViR. Significant residual MS (subhazard ratio, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.74–12.56; P =0.002) and significant residual MR (subhazard ratio, 7.88; 95% CI, 2.88–21.53; P <0.001) were both independently associated with repeat mitral valve replacement. Conclusions: Significant residual MS and/or MR were not infrequent after mitral ViV and ViR procedures and were both associated with a need for repeat valve replacement. Strategies to improve postprocedural hemodynamics in mitral ViV and ViR should be further explored.

14 August 2021 in European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMarco B. Ancona
Marco B. Ancona
MMMatteo Montorfano
Matteo Montorfano
GMGiulia Masiero
Giulia Masiero
FBFrancesco Bianchini
Francesco Bianchini
Carlo BriguoriCarlo Briguori
Carlo Briguori
ACAlaide Chieffo
Alaide Chieffo
Aims: To report the incidence, the predictors and clinical impact of device-related complications (DRCs) in the IMP-IT (IMPella Mechanical Circulatory Support Device in Italy) registry. Impella is percutaneous left ventricular assist devices, which provides mechanical circulatory support both in cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). The IMP-IT registry is a multicentre registry evaluating the trends in use and clinical outcomes of Impella in Italy. Methods and results: A total of 406 patients have been included in this registry: 56.4% in the setting of CS, while 43.6% patients in the setting of HR-PCI. DRCs were defined as a composite endpoint of access-site bleeding, limb ischaemia, vascular complication requiring treatment, haemolysis, aortic injury, and left ventricular perforation. DRC incidence in the overall population was 25.6%, with significantly higher rate in the CS (37.1%) than in the HR-PCI (10.7%) group. The most frequent complication was haemolysis (11.8%), which occurred almost exclusively in CS population. Access-site bleeding was observed in 9.6% of the overall population, with no significant difference between the two groups. Limb ischaemia was observed in 8.3% of the overall population, with significantly higher rate in the CS group. CS and right ventricular dysfunction appear as the strongest independent predictors of DRC. One-year mortality in patients with DRC appears higher than in patients with no DRC. However, DRC was not confirmed as an independent predictor of 1-year mortality at multivariate analysis. Conclusion: In the IMP-IT registry, the rate of DRC was 25.6%, with CS being the strongest independent predictor. DRC was not found as an independent predictor of 1-year mortality.

17 February 2019 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDaisuke Hachinohe
Daisuke Hachinohe
Azeem LatibAzeem Latib
Azeem Latib
ALAlessandra Laricchia
Alessandra Laricchia
GIGianmarco Iannopollo
Gianmarco Iannopollo
ODOzan M. Demir
Ozan M. Demir
ACAntonio Colombo
Antonio Colombo

1 July 2018 in International Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSatoru Mitomo
Satoru Mitomo
RJRichard J. Jabbour
Richard J. Jabbour
AMAntonio Mangieri
Antonio Mangieri
MAMarco B. Ancona
Marco B. Ancona
DRDamiano Regazzoli
Damiano Regazzoli
ACAntonio Colombo
Antonio Colombo

7 October 2020 in Echocardiography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAlessandro Beneduce
Alessandro Beneduce
CCCristina Capogrosso
Cristina Capogrosso
FMFrancesco Moroni
Francesco Moroni
FAFrancesco Ancona
Francesco Ancona
GFGiulio Falasconi
Giulio Falasconi
EAEustachio Agricola
Eustachio Agricola