Objective: Develop two fully automatic osteoporosis screening systems using deep learning (DL) and radiomics (Rad) techniques based on low-dose chest CT (LDCT) images and evaluate their diagnostic effectiveness. Methods: In total, 434 patients who underwent LDCT and bone mineral density (BMD) examination were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the development set (n = 333) and temporal validation set (n = 101). An automatic thoracic vertebra cancellous bone (TVCB) segmentation model was developed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the segmentation performance. Furthermore, the three-class Rad and DL models were developed to distinguish osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal bone mass. The diagnostic performance of these models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The automatic segmentation model achieved excellent segmentation performance, with a mean DSC of 0.96 ± 0.02 in the temporal validation set. The Rad model was used to identify osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal BMD in the temporal validation set, with respective area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.943, 0.801, and 0.932. The DL model achieved higher AUC values of 0.983, 0.906, and 0.969 for the same categories in the same validation set. The Delong test affirmed that both models performed similarly in BMD assessment. However, the accuracy of the DL model is 81.2%, which is better than the 73.3% accuracy of the Rad model in the temporal validation set. Additionally, DCA indicated that the DL model provided a greater net benefit compared to the Rad model across the majority of the reasonable threshold probabilities Conclusions: The automated segmentation framework we developed can accurately segment cancellous bone on low-dose chest CT images. These predictive models, which are based on deep learning and radiomics, provided comparable diagnostic performance in automatic BMD assessment. Nevertheless, it is important to highlight that the DL model demonstrates higher accuracy and precision than the Rad model.

Background: To evaluate the predictive value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based quantitative parameters and radiomics models for the preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules, and to compare their performance with radiologists’ interpretations. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 215 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT of the thyroid, with pathological outcomes for thyroid nodules obtained. Patients were randomly assigned to training and testing groups in a 7:3 ratio. The images were evaluated by radiologists. Quantitative parameters derived from DECT were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to construct a DECT model. Radiomics features were extracted from the 40, 70, and 100 keV virtual monochromatic images, as well as iodine-based material-decomposition (IMD) images in the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP) to develop radiomics models from both individual and combined images using a support vector machine (SVM), with the optimal performing model selected as the final radiomics model. Subsequently, a fusion model combining DECT parameters and the radiomics model was established. The diagnostic performances of the radiologist, DECT, radiomics and fusion models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and clinical usefulness was assessed through decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The normalized iodine concentration (NIC) in DECT emerged as an independent factor for the preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The multi-image radiomics model demonstrated excellent predictive performance in the test cohort, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.966 and was selected as the final model among the radiomics models. The ROC curves indicate that the radiomics model outperformed the radiologist model in predicting the thyroid nature in both the training (0.990 vs. 0.746) and test cohorts (0.966 vs. 0.697) (all p < 0.05). The diagnostic efficacy of the fusion model showed slight improvement over the radiomics model, although this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, the fusion model performed exceptionally well in DCA. Conclusions: The fusion model, which combined the NIC and the optimal multi-image radiomics model, demonstrates strong diagnostic capability in predicting benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

To assess the predictive value of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on Dual-energy CT urography (DECTU) multi-images for preoperatively predicting the muscle invasion status of bladder cancer (BCa). This retrospective analysis involved 202 BCa patients who underwent DECTU. DECTU-derived quantitative parameters were identified as risk factors through stepwise regression analysis to construct a DECT model. The radiomic features from the intratumoral and 3 mm outward peritumoral regions were extracted from the 120 kVp-like, 40 keV, 100 keV, and iodine-based material-decomposition (IMD) images in the venous-phase and were screened using Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation analysis, and LASSO. Radiomics models were developed using the Multilayer Perceptron for the intratumoral, peritumoral and intra- and peritumoral (IntraPeri) regions. Subsequently, a nomogram was created by integrating the multi-image IntraPeri radiomics and DECT model. Model performance was evaluated using area-under-the-curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Normalized iodine concentration (NIC) was identified as an independent predictor for the DECT model. The IntraPeri model demonstrated superior performance compared to the intratumoral and peritumoral models both in 40 keV (0.830 vs. 0.766 vs. 0.763) and IMD images (0.881 vs. 0.840 vs. 0.821) in the test cohort. In the test cohort, the nomogram exhibited the best predictability (AUC=0.886, accuracy=0.836, sensitivity=0.737, and specificity=0.881), outperformed the DECT model (AUC=0.763, accuracy=0.754, sensitivity=0.632, and specificity=0.810) in predicting muscle invasion status of BCa with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The nomogram, incorporating IntraPeri radiomics and NIC, serves as a valuable and non-invasive tool for preoperatively assessing the muscle invasion status of BCa.

Background: CT-guided hook-wire localization is an essential step in the management of small pulmonary nodules. Few studies, however, have focused on reducing radiation exposure during the procedure. Purpose: This study aims to explore the feasibility of implementing a low-dose computed tomography (CT)-guided hook wire localization using tailored kVp based on patients’ body size. Materials and Methods: A total of 151 patients with small pulmonary nodules were prospectively enrolled for CT-guided hook wire localization using individualized low-dose CT (LDCT) vs. standard-dose CT (SDCT) protocols. Radiation dose, image quality, characteristics of target nodules and procedure-related variables were compared. All variables were analyzed using Chi-Square and Student’s t-test. Results: The mean CTDIvol was significantly reduced for LDCT (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m², 0.56 ± 0.00 mGy and for BMI > 21 kg/m², 1.48 ± 0.00 mGy) when compared with SDCT (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m², 5.24 ± 0.95 mGy and for BMI > 21 kg/m², 6.69 ± 1.47 mGy). Accordingly, the DLP of LDCT was significantly reduced as compared with that of SDCT (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m², 56.86 ± 4.73 vs. 533.58 ± 122.06 mGy.cm, and for BMI > 21 kg/m², 167.02 ± 38.76 vs. 746.01 ± 230.91 mGy.cm). In comparison with SDCT, the effective dose (ED) of LDCT decreased by an average of 89.42% (for BMI ≤ 21 kg/m²) and 77.68% (for BMI > 21 kg/m²), respectively. Although the images acquired with the LDCT protocol yielded inferior quality to those acquired with the SDCT protocol, they were clinically acceptable for hook wire localization. Conclusions: LDCT-guided localization can provide safety and nodule detection performance comparable to SDCT-guided localization, benefiting radiation dose reduction dramatically, especially for patients with small body mass indexes.

The dual-energy spectral CT (DEsCT) employs material decomposition (MD) technology, opening up novel avenues for the opportunistic assessment of bone status. Radiomics, a powerful tool for elucidating the structural and textural characteristics of bone, aids in the detection of mineral loss. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy of bone status assessment using both bone density measurements and radiomics models derived from MD images and to further explore the clinical value of radiomics models. Methods: Retrospective data were collected from 307 patients who underwent both quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and full-abdomen DEsCT scans at our institution. Based on QCT measurements, patients were divided into three categories: normal bone mineral density (BMD), osteopenia, and osteoporosis. Using the abdominal DEsCT data, six types of MD images were reconstructed, including HAP (Water), HAP (Fat), Ca (Water), Ca (Fat), Fat (Ca), and Fat (HAP). Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 214) and a validation cohort (n = 93) at a ratio of 7:3. Focusing on the L1 to L3 vertebrae, density values from the six MD images were measured. Six density value models and six radiomics models were constructed using a random forest (RF) classifier. The performance of these models in assessing bone status was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the DeLong test was employed to compare performance differences between the models. Results: The macro-area under the curve (AUC) values for the density value models based on HAP (Water), HAP (Fat), Ca (Water), and Ca (Fat) MD images were 0.870, 0.870, 0.847, and 0.765, respectively, which outperformed those of Fat (Ca) (AUC = 0.623) and Fat (HAP) (AUC = 0.618) density value models. In the comparison of radiomics models, the trends of model performance were consistent with the density value models across the six MD images. However, the models based on HAP (Water), Ca (Water), HAP (Fat), Ca (Fat), Fat (Ca), and Fat (HAP) images exhibited superior performance than those of the density value models with the corresponding MD images, with values of 0.946, 0.941, 0.934, 0.926, 0.831, and 0.824, respectively. Conclusions: Bone status assessment can be accurately conducted using density values from HAP (Water), HAP (Fat), Ca (Water), and Ca (Fat) MD images. However, radiomics models derived from MD images surpass traditional density measurement methods in evaluating bone status, highlighting their superior diagnostic potential.