The current study aims to investigate the utilization of an analytic rubric system to assess the performance of preclinical dental students in executing ro

Background: This simulated study of 30 severely curved L-shaped root canals aimed to compare preparation time, aberrations, width measurements, and fractured files of three nickel–titanium (Ni–Ti) files, namely, ProTaper, ProTaper Next (PTN), and WaveOne (WO). Methods: Thirty simulated L-curved root canals of resin blocks were randomly divided into three groups. The canals were prepared to a tip size of 25 using ProTaper, PTN, and WO rotary file systems. Pre- and post-operative views for each sample were captured by a professional camera at a standardized distance and position. Blue India ink was injected into the pre-operative canals, and red India ink was injected into the post-operative canals to give a clear superimposition image. Five points were assessed through the halfway of the canal to the orifice (area between the beginning of curvature and apical end point). Preparation time, aberrations, width measurements, and fractured files were recorded and analyzed. Results: Mean preparation time was longest in ProTaper (4.89± 0.68 minutes). PTN and WO were the fastest in preparing the canals (about 3 minutes). A statistically significant difference was found between WO and ProTaper & PTN and ProTaper (p=0.000), while the difference was non-significant (p > 0.05) between WO and PTN. Nine aberrations consisting of three zips, one ledge and one outer widening were related to ProTaper, while WO recorded a ledge and fractured file, but for PTN system, it verified an outer widening and ledge. Only one WO file fractured, with no deformation observed in the other instruments. No significance was recorded among the width measurements in the different levels. Conclusion: ProTaper next achieved faster cutting than the ProTaper and WO file systems. PTN maintained the best apical termination position and produced the least canal aberration, followed by WO and ProTaper.

Aim: Root canal treatment (RCT) is a common procedure practiced daily by dentists worldwide. The current systematic review aimed to evaluate and compare clinical studies on the quality of root canal fillings (RCFs) carried out by dentists with different levels of experience conducted worldwide with those conducted specifically in Saudi Arabia (SA). Materials and Methods: A full literature search was conducted in Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science, Elsevier’s Scopus, Embase, CINHAL, and PubMed, without a restriction to studies published before January 2015. Also, a manual search was carried out by checking papers that may have been missed during the electronic search. The following keywords were used: [(quality of root canal filling(s)) OR (quality of root canal obturation)) and dental practitioners as (general dental practitioners; final year students; endodontist; specialist) AND (root canal obturation) OR (endodontic treatment)]. Parameters of the quality of RCFs, such as length, density, and taper, were assessed and counted. Results: A total of 13 worldwide and nine SA studies were included in this review, published between 2015 and 2023. Molars were the most treated teeth, at 42.3% and 40.2% for the worldwide and SA studies, respectively. Cases treated by final year students had the highest percentage, at 60.0% for both study groups. The percentages of acceptable quality, with regard to the length, density, and taper of RCFs, were 70.9%, 77.6%, and 84.3%, and 73.2%, 64.6%, and 67.8% for the worldwide and SA studies, respectively. Conclusion: The overall acceptable quality of RCFs was marginally higher in worldwide studies than in SA studies. Both prevalences can be considered as good, which indicates that the quality of RCFs is moving in the right direction.

Background: Stress-induced health disorders are related to an unhealthy lifestyle. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of perceived stress among medical students and to correlate their respective stress levels with the caries index: decayed, missing. filled surfaces (DMFS). Material/Methods: This study included 290 undergraduate medical students (140 men, 150 women) from 4 different grades. Demographic characteristics and perceived stress scale (PSS) were measured using a pre-validated scaled questionnaire. The DMFS for each individual was measured intraorally. Continuous variables were expressed as means, and categorical variables as frequencies. Using Pearson correlation, the types and strengths of the relationships between stress levels and DMFS scores were determined (positive, negative, linear, nonlinear). All differences were considered significant at a P value of less than 0.01 (P<0.01). Results: A higher percentage of participants had moderate stress (73.8%), with higher PSS scores among female participants (m=21.52) than male participants (m=20.43). Participants with higher stress scores (27 to 40) had very high DMFS scores (4.5 to 6.5). Age had a negative association with stress (r=-0.072, P=0.219) and DMFS (r=-0.023, P=0.695) scores. No significant differences in scores indicated no significant linear link between the variables. A significantly positive linear correlation was observed between stress and DMFS scores (r=0.41, P=0.000) although the correlation was weak. Conclusions: Undergraduate medical students perceive stress during their training. Level of stress was associated with severity of dental caries.

Background/Objectives: Vertical root fractures (VRFs) present significant diagnostic challenges due to their subtle radiographic features and variability across imaging modalities. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential to improve detection accuracy, yet evidence regarding its performance across different imaging systems remains fragmented. To critically evaluate current evidence on AI-assisted detection of VRFs across periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to compare diagnostic performance, methodological strengths, and limitations. Methods: A systematic review of literature up to January 2025 was carried out using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The studies included in this review utilized AI-based techniques for detecting VRF through periapical, panoramic, or CBCT imaging. Extracted data encompassed study design, AI models, dataset sizes, preprocessing methods, imaging parameters, validation techniques, and diagnostic metrics. The risk of bias in these studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: Ten studies met inclusion criteria; CNN-based models predominated, with performance highly dependent on imaging modality. CBCT-based AI systems achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (91.4–97.8%) and specificity (90.7–100%), followed by periapical radiography models with accuracies up to 95.7% in controlled settings. Panoramic radiography models demonstrated lower sensitivity (0.45–0.75) but maintained high precision (0.93) in certain contexts. Most studies reported improvements over human performance, yet limitations included small datasets, heterogeneous methodologies, and risk of overfitting. Conclusions: AI-assisted VRF detection shows promising accuracy, particularly with CBCT imaging, but current evidence is constrained by methodological variability and limited clinical validation.

Background: A tooth preparation's clinical requirements and geometric configurations should take precedence over material characteristics when advocating for putty reline impression techniques for permanent restorations, since they require a technically sensitive spacer for light body elastomer. We evaluated the linear dimensional accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane-based putty reline impressions with different spacer acquisition techniques in shortspan and long-span fixed partial dentures (FPD). Material/Methods: A typodont tooth set simulated a 3-unit (short-span) and a 5-unit (long-span) FPD. Between respective prepared abutments, 31 coordinates were identified and measured based on angles (line/point) and surfaces (curved/flat). Sixty impressions (dual stage 2-step putty reline technique) were divided into 5 groups (n=12/group): group PP porary), and group MT (modified temporary), depending on spacer acquisition method. Coordinates measurements were conducted using a measuring microscope. Descriptive and inferential statistical tests (ANOVA, post hoc Tukey) determined between-group and within-group differences, at P <= 0.05 significance level. Results: In short-span FPD, compared with control, the number of significantly different coordinates group-wise were GP (4 coordinates), PP (2 coordinates), and PS, CT, and MT (1 each). In long-span FPD, compared with control, the number of significantly different coordinates group-wise were group GP (12 coordinates), group PP (10 coordinates), group PS (5 coordinates), and group CT and group MT (4 each). Conclusions: Different spacer acquisition methods produce varied thickness of spacers for relining of putty. CT and MT, when used as spacers, provided maximum accurate coordinates for angles (line/point) and surfaces (curved/flat).