There is an ongoing search for novel disinfection techniques that are not only effective, cheap, and convenient, but that also do not have adverse effects on the properties of dental impressions. We compared the effects of various methods (UVC, gaseous ozone, commercial solution, and spray) on the dimensional change, tensile strength, and hardness of silicone impressions. Moreover, as a secondary aim, we performed a statistical comparison of the properties of nondisinfected addition (Panasil Putty Soft, Panasil monophase Medium, Panasil initial contact Light) and condensation silicones (Zetaplus Putty and Oranwash L), as well as a comparison of materials of various viscosities (putty, medium-bodied, and light-bodied). Our results revealed that addition silicones had higher dimensional stability, tensile strength, and Shore A hardness compared to condensation silicones. Both traditional (immersion and spraying) and alternative methods of disinfection (UVC and ozone) had no significant impact on the tensile properties and dimensional stability of the studied silicones; however, they significantly affected the hardness, particularly of Oranwash L. Our study demonstrated that, similarly to standard liquid disinfectants, both UVC and ozone do not strongly affect the material properties of most silicones. However, before recommendation, their usefulness for each individual material should be thoroughly evaluated.

Background/Objectives: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a heterogeneous group of musculoskeletal conditions affecting the temporomandibular joints and masticatory muscles. In recent years, autogenous injections have been investigated as minimally invasive therapeutic options to alleviate pain and improve function. However, the clinical effectiveness of such therapies across different TMD phenotypes remains uncertain. Methods: Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science for articles published between January 2015 and May 2025. Studies involving intra-articular or intra-muscular autogenous injections in TMD patients were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven were non-randomized clinical studies. Ten studies evaluated intra-articular conditions such as disc displacement or Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis, while three focused on myofascial pain. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) was the most frequently investigated agent. Most studies reported statistically significant reductions in pain and improvements in mandibular mobility following autogenous injections, with PRP generally outperforming comparators such as hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids, or saline. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: All PRP and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) injection protocols reviewed were effective in reducing pain and improving mobility in patients with TMD. However, differences in protocols and follow-up times prevented a meta-analysis from being conducted. More standardized RCTs are needed to determine clear clinical guidelines.

Sleep bruxism (SB) and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) are two prevalent conditions that significantly impact overall health. Studies suggest that up to 49.7% of individuals with SDB also exhibit symptoms of SB. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the role of genetic background and neurotransmission in the pathogenesis of the co-occurrence of SB and SDB. It seeks to synthesize current knowledge, highlight gaps in the existing literature, and propose a new perspective that integrates genetic and neurobiological factors. This review shows that both SB and SDB may be influenced by a combination of genetic, neurochemical, and environmental factors that contribute to their shared pathophysiology. The key neurotransmitters—dopamine, serotonin, and GABA—may play a significant role in their co-occurrence by regulating motor activity, sleep architecture, and respiratory control. Understanding genetic and neurochemical mechanisms may allow for more precise diagnostic tools and more personalized treatment approaches regarding SB and SDB. Clinically, there is a need for interdisciplinary collaboration between sleep specialists, dentists, neurologists, and geneticists. There is also a need to conduct large-scale genetic studies, coupled with neuroimaging and neurophysiological research, uncovering additional insights into the shared mechanisms of SB and SDB.