David Ian McCracken

Prof. David Ian McCracken

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2008 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Klaus HenleKlaus Henle
Klaus Henle
DADidier Alard
Didier Alard
JCJeremy Clitherow
Jeremy Clitherow
PCPaul Cobb
Paul Cobb
LFLes Firbank
Les Firbank
Juliette YoungJuliette Young
Juliette Young

1 January 2013 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAlan Renwick
Alan Renwick
TJTorbjorn Jansson
Torbjorn Jansson
PVPeter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg
CRCesar Revoredo-Giha
Cesar Revoredo-Giha
WBWolfgang Britz
Wolfgang Britz
DMDavid Ian McCracken
David Ian McCracken

1 June 2005 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Juliette YoungJuliette Young
Juliette Young
AWAllan Watt
Allan Watt
PNPeter Nowicki
Peter Nowicki
DADidier Alard
Didier Alard
JCJeremy Clitherow
Jeremy Clitherow
CRCaspian Richards
Caspian Richards

8 January 2014 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Juliette YoungJuliette Young
Juliette Young
KWKerry Waylen
Kerry Waylen
SSSimo Sarkki
Simo Sarkki
SASteve Albon
Steve Albon
IBIan Bainbridge
Ian Bainbridge
AWAllan Watt
Allan Watt
A better, more effective dialogue is needed between biodiversity science and policy to underpin the sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity. Many initiatives exist to improve communication, but these largely conform to a ‘linear’ or technocratic model of communication in which scientific “facts” are transmitted directly to policy advisers to “solve problems”. While this model can help start a dialogue, it is, on its own, insufficient, as decision taking is complex, iterative and often selective in the information used. Here, we draw on the literature, interviews and a workshop with individuals working at the interface between biodiversity science and government policy development to present practical recommendations aimed at individuals, teams, organisations and funders. Building on these recommendations, we stress the need to: (a) frame research and policy jointly; (b) promote inter- and trans-disciplinary research and “multi-domain” working groups that include both scientists and policy makers from various fields and sectors; (c) put in place structures and incentive schemes that support interactive dialogue in the long-term. These are changes that are needed in light of continuing loss of biodiversity and its consequences for societal dependence on and benefits from nature.

30 October 2010 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Juliette YoungJuliette Young
Juliette Young
MMMariella Marzano
Mariella Marzano
RWRehema M. White
Rehema M. White
DMDavid Ian McCracken
David Ian McCracken
SRSteve M. Redpath
Steve M. Redpath
AWAllan D. Watt
Allan D. Watt

15 August 2003 in Journal of Animal Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJ. M. Reid
J. M. Reid
EBE. M. Bignal
E. M. Bignal
SBS. Bignal
S. Bignal
DMDavid Ian McCracken
David Ian McCracken
PMP. Monaghan
P. Monaghan