In modern manufacturing, there is an increasing demand for reliable in-process measurement methods directly on large CNC machine tools, eliminating the need to transport workpieces to metrological laboratories. This study assesses the capability and applicability of an articulated arm coordinate measuring machine and a machine tool touch-trigger probe when measuring to a specified tolerance of 0.05 mm in a production environment. Experiments were conducted using the KOBA calibration standard and included measurements with and without applying the articulated arm coordinate measuring machine leapfrog method. The results were evaluated according to ISO 22514-7:2021 and ISO 14253-1:2017, which establish criteria for measurement system capability. The findings revealed that neither measurement system met the capability requirements of ISO 22514-7:2021, particularly due to unsatisfactory Q_MS and C_MS values. However, under ISO 14253-1:2017, both systems were deemed conditionally suitable for verifying conformity to the specifications, with the articulated arm coordinate measuring machine showing lower applicability when using the leapfrog method. This research supports the idea that unreasonable demands for compliance with current standards may lead to questioning of the systems that previously met older standards. The study contributes to the ongoing discussion on integrating advanced metrological tools into the manufacturing process and underscores the need for careful evaluation to ensure the capability and reliability of measurement systems in industrial practice.

The current digitization of industrial processes is leading to the development of smart machines and smart applications in the field of engineering technologies. The basis is an advanced sensor system that monitors selected characteristic values of the machine. The obtained data need to be further analysed, correctly interpreted, and visualized by the machine operator. Thus the machine operator can gain a sixth sense for keeping the machine and the production process in a suitable condition. This has a positive effect on reducing the stress load on the operator in the production of expensive components and in monitoring the safe condition of the machine. The key element here is the use of a suitable classification model for data evaluation of the monitored machine parameters. The article deals with the comparison of the success rate of classification models from the MATLAB Classification Learner App. Classification models will compare data from the frequency and time domain, the data source is the same. Both data samples are from real measurements on the CNC vertical machining center (CNC-Computer Numerical Control). Three basic states representing machine tool damage are recognized. The data are then processed and reduced for the use of the MATLAB Classification Learner app, which creates a model for recognizing faults. The article aims to compare the success rate of classification models when the data source is a dataset in time or frequency domain and combination.

The increasing digitization of manufacturing and the integration of CNC and industrial control systems into the industry 4.0 environment have introduced new cybersecurity risks that directly affect operational reliability. Traditional deterministic risk-assessment methods used for securing ICS—such as SCADA, PLC, and CNC systems—struggle to address uncertainty, dynamic operating conditions, and complex dependencies between technical and organizational factors. To overcome these limitations, this study develops a Bayesian Network (BN) model that captures probabilistic relationships between machine-level configuration parameters, network conditions, and potential security incidents. The model is applied to a CNC machining center (ZPS MCG1000i), where it supports scenario-based prediction of cybersecurity risks and provides interpretable outputs suitable for operator decision-making and human–machine interaction. The results demonstrate that BNs are effective in environments with limited data availability and high uncertainty, offering transparent and quantifiable insights into how specific misconfigurations—such as active remote access or irregular firmware updates—elevate overall system exposure. The proposed approach aligns with current regulatory and standardization requirements, including the NIS2 Directive (EU 2022/2555), ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27005:2022, and Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (Cyber Resilience Act), which define cybersecurity obligations for products with digital elements. The study provides a reproducible and future-oriented methodology for integrating cybersecurity into machinery-safety evaluation in modern industrial environments.