Haiquan Jing

Dr. Haiquan Jing

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2014 in Journal of Fluids and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHui Li
Hui Li
SLShujin Laima
Shujin Laima
HJHaiquan Jing
Haiquan Jing

1 January 2017 in Journal of Fluids and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HJHaiquan Jing
Haiquan Jing
YXYong Xia
Yong Xia
HLHui Li
Hui Li
YXYoulin Xu
Youlin Xu
YLYongle Li
Yongle Li

15 August 2018 in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XHXuhui He
Xuhui He
LZLei Zhou
Lei Zhou
ZCZhengwei Chen
Zhengwei Chen
HJHaiquan Jing
Haiquan Jing
YZYunfeng Zou
Yunfeng Zou
Teng WuTeng Wu
Teng Wu
This paper investigates the effect of a wind barrier on the aerodynamic performance of a train–bridge system under crosswind using a numerical simulation method. The studied bridge is a long-span cable-stayed bridge with a flat steel box girder, located in Chongqing, China. The flow field around the train–bridge system with and without a wind barrier is numerically simulated. Wind barrier porosities varying from 10 to 60% are evaluated. The tricomponent coefficients of the train, bridge, and train–bridge system are obtained and investigated in detail. The effect of the wind barrier on the aerodynamics of the train–bridge system is revealed through the determination of the aerodynamic forces, pressure mapping, and flow visualization. The results show that a wind barrier successfully decreases the mean velocity above the girder and consequently decreases the drag force and moment on the train; however, the wind barrier also significantly increases the drag force on the girder. Therefore, installation of a wind barrier improves the running safety of the train but is detrimental to the wind resistance of the bridge. Additionally, the efficiency of the wind barrier depends on the porosity. A lower porosity improves the train safety but is more detrimental to the bridge safety. An optimal wind barrier porosity of 30% is obtained based on the aerodynamic forces of both the train and the bridge. Compared to a train–bridge system without a wind barrier, the drag force and moment on the train decrease by 66.1 and 62.9%, respectively; the drag force on the bridge girder increases to 0.86, and the drag force on the train–bridge system equals that without the wind barrier.

1 March 2018 in Journal of Sound and Vibration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HJHaiquan Jing
Haiquan Jing
XHXuhui He
Xuhui He
YZYunfeng Zou
Yunfeng Zou
HWHanfeng Wang
Hanfeng Wang

1 November 2015 in Journal of Fluids and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HJHaiquan Jing
Haiquan Jing
YXYong Xia
Yong Xia
HLHui Li
Hui Li
YXYoulin Xu
Youlin Xu
YLYongle Li
Yongle Li

1 July 2015 in Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYongle Li
Yongle Li
HJHaiquan Jing
Haiquan Jing
YXYong Xia
Yong Xia
YXYoulin Xu
Youlin Xu
HXHuoyue Xiang
Huoyue Xiang