Background: Burn first aid awareness has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. We present a report on the knowledge and practices of the Saudi population with regard to burn first aid and the application of traditional remedies. Methods: An internet-based survey was conducted to assess the public’s knowledge on first aid practices and home remedies applied for burn injuries among Saudi adults. Results: A total of 2758 individuals responded to the survey. There were 1178 (42.7 %) respondents who had previously received burn first aid information. One thousand five hundred fifty respondents had a history of burn exposure in which burn injury first aid was applied as follows: 1118 (72.1 %) removed clothing and accessories from the injured area; water was applied by 990 (63.9 %); among those who applied water, 877 (88.6 %) applied cold water; and only 57 (5.8 %) did so for more than 15 min. Wrapping the burn area was performed by 526 (33.9 %), and 985 (63.5 %) sought medical assistance. When it comes to traditional remedies, 2134 (77.4 %) knew of and/or implemented these remedies as first aid or to treat burns. Honey and toothpaste were the commonest among these remedies with 1491 (69.9 %) and 1147 (53.7 %), respectively. This was associated with female gender (r = 0.87, P < 0.001), younger age group (19–25 years) (r = 0.077, P < 0.001), from central region (r = 0.012, P < 0.001), and university graduate (r = 0.05, P = 0.002). Nearly half of those who knew of traditional remedies did not have previous knowledge of burn first aid. Conclusions: Proper burn first aid is a simple, cheap, and accessible means of managing burns initially. Although the majority of the respondents were university graduates (51.1 %), knowledge and implementation of burn first aid was very poor. Major healthcare agencies should review and promote a consistent guideline for burn first aid in an effort to tackle and minimize the effect of this grave injury.

The standard of care in the treatment of symptomatic tarsal coalitions is open surgery. However, certain limitations exist with open surgery, which include limited visualization leading to an incomplete resection and possible recurrence of the tarsal coalition. Arthroscopic tarsal coalition resection (TCR) is an alternative that is gaining traction, primarily as the safety profile of posterior ankle and subtalar arthroscopy is more well understood. This study provides a systematic review of the outcomes of arthroscopic TCR. PubMed and Embase were searched independently by 2 reviewers for relevant articles based on predetermined criteria. The subject heading "tarsal coalition" and its related key terms were used. A total of 416 studies were revealed by the initial search, out of which only 6 met our predetermined inclusion criteria. A total of 42 patients (average age: 17.6 years) were treated with arthroscopic TCR. Thirty-three (78.6%) and 9 (21.4%) patients had talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions, respectively. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 60 months (mean: 26 months), and no recurrence of the tarsal coalition was detected (0.0%). Complications occurred in two (4.8%) patients only, with one developing complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and another patient developing hyperesthesia on the medial aspect of the calcaneus. Arthroscopic TCR is a feasible and effective surgery for both CNC and TCC with minimal complications and no disease recurrence at an average of 26 months follow-up. Future high-level of evidence studies are needed to compare the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic TCR.

Background: This study evaluates the prevalence and outcomes of patients with idiopathic clubfoot and clinically detected limb length discrepancy (LLD). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of idiopathic clubfoot patients in a Research Ethics Board–approved clubfoot registry. Patients with LLD ≥0.5 cm (LLD+) were compared with those with no or <0.5 cm LLD (LLD−). LLD was determined by documented clinical examination. Exclusion criteria included nonidiopathic clubfoot deformity, <2-year follow-up, and incomplete records. Results: Of the 300 patients included, 27 (9.0%) had an LLD, of whom 23 patients had a unilateral clubfoot deformity. The prevalence of LLD was 15.3% and 2.67% in unilateral and bilateral clubfoot patients, respectively. The mean LLD was 1.21 cm (0.5 to 3.5 cm, SD: 0.78 cm) in LLD+ patients, with a mean of 1.27 cm (SD: 0.79 cm) in unilateral clubfoot patients and 0.88 cm (SD: 0.75 cm) in bilateral patients. The total number of casts applied in LLD+ unilateral clubfoot patients was significantly higher than in LLD− unilateral patients (9.5 vs. 6.8 casts; P=0.015). The overall relapse rate in all patients was 30.3% and was significantly higher in the unilateral only LLD+ group [relative risk (RR)=2.89] and the total LLD+ patient cohort (RR=1.68). The risk of repeat casting for relapse was also higher in the unilateral LLD+ group (RR=2.45) and the total LLD+ group (RR=1.87). The risk of surgery for relapse was significantly higher in the unilateral LLD+ group for any surgery (P=0.046), and most specifically for open tendo-Achilles tenotomy (P=0.008) and tibialis anterior tendon transfer (P=0.019). There was no correlation between the severity of LLD and Pirani score at presentation. Conclusions: LLD was present in 9% of idiopathic clubfoot patients, and most were <2 cm. There is a significantly higher risk of relapse in patients with unilateral clubfoot and LLD. The risk of surgery overall was higher in all patients with a unilateral LLD. Assessment of LLD should be routinely performed in clubfoot patients. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Background and Objectives: Hyponatraemia increases the morbidity and mortality risks of orthopaedic patients. When undergoing spine surgery, hyponatraemic patients have high risks of pneumonia and of staying in hospital for up to 1 day longer compared with non-hyponatraemic patients. This study aims to assess the occurrence of adverse events among patients with pre-operative hyponatraemia after undergoing lumbar surgery. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients who underwent spinal surgery in 2011 to 2013 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariate analysis was conducted to demonstrate the difference in post-operative complication rates between hyponatraemic patients and normonatraemic patients. Post-operative adverse events, need for blood transfusion and length of stay were considered as clinical outcome data. Results: A total of 58,049 patients were included; pre-operatively, 55,012 (94.8%) were normonatraemic and 3037 (5.2%) were hyponatraemic. Multivariate analysis showed that hyponatraemic patients had higher rates of adverse events, blood transfusions and urinary tract infections. Specifically, 632 (20.8%) hyponatraemic patients developed adverse events, compared with 6821 (12.4%) normonatraemic patients; the hyponatraemic patients received transfusions, compared with 6821 (7.4%) normonatraemic patients; and 97 (3.2%) hyponatraemic patients developed urinary tract infections, compared with 715 (1.3%) normonatraemic patients. Finally, an extended length of stay beyond 6 days occurred in 604 (19.9%) hyponatraemic patients, compared with 4676 (8.5%) normonatraemic patients. Conclusions: Our study identified an association between pre-operative hyponatraemia and post-operative adverse events in spinal surgery patients. However, it is unclear whether hyponatraemia caused the higher adverse event rate.