Dilip Khatiwada

Dr. Dilip Khatiwada

Department of Energy Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RYRyutaka Yudhistira
Ryutaka Yudhistira
Dilip KhatiwadaDilip Khatiwada
Dilip Khatiwada
FSFernando Sanchez
Fernando Sanchez

1 January 2016 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dilip KhatiwadaDilip Khatiwada
Dilip Khatiwada
SLSylvain Leduc
Sylvain Leduc
SSSemida Silveira
Semida Silveira
IMIan McCallum
Ian McCallum

2 May 2018 in Biofuels
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Dilip KhatiwadaDilip Khatiwada
Dilip Khatiwada
CPCarl Palmén
Carl Palmén
SSSemida Silveira
Semida Silveira
This paper investigates the development of domestic and international demand for Indonesian palm oil, in line with national biofuel mandates and established export markets. Domestic demand for palm oil for (i) achieving biodiesel targets and (ii) meeting food and industrial uses will reach 20 million tonnes by 2025, equivalent to 61% of Indonesian production in 2014. Thus, it is possible for Indonesia to be self-sufficient, reaching the biodiesel targets without increasing plantation areas. However, to meet both domestic and international demand, a total 51 million tonnes of crude palm oil will be needed in 2025. This requires additional land of up to 6 million hectares with current yields. The expansion of oil palm plantations in Indonesia has led to debates related to deforestation, threatened biodiversity, and greenhouse gas emissions. We show that increasing agricultural yields could serve the purpose, benefiting biodiesel production while reducing the need for new land. Therefore, we recommend that the ambitious Indonesian biodiesel mandates are pursued in combination with a strategy for increased productivity in palm oil production, utilization of degraded land to contain greenhouse gas emissions, and use of palm oil biomass residues for energy production.

13 July 2022 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Dilip KhatiwadaDilip Khatiwada
Dilip Khatiwada
RVRohan Adithya Vasudevan
Rohan Adithya Vasudevan
BSBruno Henrique Santos
Bruno Henrique Santos

1 March 2019 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FHFumi Maeda Harahap
Fumi Maeda Harahap
SSSemida Silveira
Semida Silveira
Dilip KhatiwadaDilip Khatiwada
Dilip Khatiwada

20 July 2021 in Earth's Future
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Prajal PradhanPrajal Pradhan
Prajal Pradhan
DSDaya Raj Subedi
Daya Raj Subedi
Dilip KhatiwadaDilip Khatiwada
Dilip Khatiwada
KJKirti Kusum Joshi
Kirti Kusum Joshi
SKSagar Kafle
Sagar Kafle
DBDinesh Raj Bhuju
Dinesh Raj Bhuju
The COVID‐19 pandemic has impacted social, economic, and environmental systems worldwide, slowing down and reversing the progress made in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). SDGs belong to the 2030 Agenda to transform our world by tackling humankind's challenges to ensure well‐being, economic prosperity, and environmental protection. We explore the potential impacts of the pandemic on SDGs for Nepal. We followed a knowledge co‐creation process with experts from various professional backgrounds, involving five steps: online survey, online workshop, assessment of expert's opinions, review and validation, and revision and synthesis. The pandemic has negatively impacted most SDGs in the short term. Particularly, the targets of SDG 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13 have and will continue to have weakly to moderately restricting impacts. However, a few targets of SDG 2, 3, 6, and 11 could also have weakly promoting impacts. The negative impacts have resulted from impeding factors linked to the pandemic. Many of the negative impacts may subside in the medium and long terms. The key five impeding factors are lockdowns, underemployment and unemployment, closure of institutions and facilities, diluted focus and funds for non‐COVID‐19‐related issues, and anticipated reduction in support from development partners. The pandemic has also opened a window of opportunity for sustainable transformation, which is short‐lived and narrow. These opportunities are lessons learned for planning and action, socio‐economic recovery plan, use of information and communication technologies and the digital economy, reverse migration and “brain gain,” and local governments' exercising authorities.