This narrative review evaluates the current role of interventional radiology in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disorders. In patients with biochemically confirmed hyperparathyroidism but inconclusive or discordant preoperative localization imaging, image-guided interventions can help establish a diagnosis that can alter management. This review outlines the current diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for the study of parathyroid pathology from the interventional radiologist’s perspective, highlighting novel techniques and their growing clinical adoption. The combination of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and measurement of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the needle washout fluid can improve diagnostic specificity by providing biochemical evidence of parathyroid tissue. This is particularly useful for lesions that are difficult to differentiate from thyroid nodules or cervical lymph nodes based solely on imaging characteristics. Despite this, no widely accepted cut-off washout PTH level has yet been established. Due to the differences in assay techniques and laboratory procedures, results should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings and concomitant biochemical parameters. Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation techniques, especially radiofrequency and microwave ablation, have recently been reported as minimally invasive alternatives or adjuvants to surgery in appropriately selected patients. Evidence supporting parathyroid embolization is limited, but it may be considered a potential salvage option for persistent or recurrent disease. Given that most of the current evidence is derived from retrospective case series, multicenter prospective studies for technical standardization and long-term outcomes evaluation are clearly needed.

Symptomatic Chiari type 1 malformation (CIM) patients may elect to be treated; however, choosing the optimum surgical method remains problematic: posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD...

Background: Epithelial tumors are the most common subgroup and are seen in 60-70% of all ovarian tumors. Serous cystadenoma and mucinous cystadenoma are the most common benign epithelial tumors. Serous cystadenomas are ovarian tumors with the highest bilateral incidence. The coexistence of tumors with different histopathology in the ovaries is extremely rare and has only been reported in a few cases in the literature. We present a case of bilateral ovarian tumor that was diagnosed as serous and mucinous cystadenoma after laparoscopic surgery. Case report: A 45-year-old female patient was admitted to our center with swelling in the pelvic region and pain in the left lumbar region. US imaging showed a cystic lesion in the right adnexal area, 4x2cm in size, well-circumscribed, containing a few thin septa, and a low echo fluid content. A cystic lesion with 6x4cm sized multilocular, well-circumscribed, slightly high echo fluid content was observed in the left adnexal area. On CT, a complex cystic lesion measuring 6x4cm was observed in the left adnexal area, pushing the left ureter laterally and causing the hydroureter. In addition, a 4x2cm cystic lesion was observed in the right adnexal area and hydroureter was observed on the right side proximal to this lesion. Both lesions were removed by surgery. On histopathologic examination, the left-sided cystic lesion was diagnosed as mucinous cystadenoma, and the right-sided cystic lesion was diagnosed as serous cystadenoma. Conclusion: The coexistence of different ovarian tumor subtypes is rare. In this article, we presented a case in which serous and mucinous cystadenoma lesions were seen together for the fourth time in the literature, according to our knowledge.