Customer churn is a critical issue impacting enterprises and organizations, particularly in the emerging and highly competitive telecommunications industry. It is important to researchers and industry analysts interested in projecting customer behavior to separate churn from non-churn consumers. The fundamental incentive is a firm’s intent desire to keep current consumers, along with the exorbitant expense of gaining new ones. Many solutions have been developed to address customer churn prediction (CCP), such as rule-based and machine learning (ML) solutions. However, the issue of scalability and robustness of rule-based customer churn solutions is a critical drawback, while the imbalanced nature of churn datasets has a detrimental impact on the prediction efficacy of conventional ML techniques in CCP. As a result, in this study, we developed intelligent decision forest (DF) models for CCP in telecommunication. Specifically, we investigated the prediction performances of the logistic model tree (LMT), random forest (RF), and Functional Trees (FT) as DF models and enhanced DF (LMT, RF, and FT) models based on weighted soft voting and weighted stacking methods. Extensive experimentation was performed to ascertain the efficacy of the suggested DF models utilizing publicly accessible benchmark telecom CCP datasets. The suggested DF models efficiently distinguish churn from non-churn consumers in the presence of the class imbalance problem. In addition, when compared to baseline and existing ML-based CCP methods, comparative findings showed that the proposed DF models provided superior prediction performances and optimal solutions for CCP in the telecom industry. Hence, the development and deployment of DF-based models for CCP and applicable ML tasks are recommended.

As a result of the rapid advancement of mobile and internet technology, a plethora of new mobile security risks has recently emerged. Many techniques have been developed to address the risks associated with Android malware. The most extensively used method for identifying Android malware is signature-based detection. The drawback of this method, however, is that it is unable to detect unknown malware. As a consequence of this problem, machine learning (ML) methods for detecting and classifying malware applications were developed. The goal of conventional ML approaches is to improve classification accuracy. However, owing to imbalanced real-world datasets, the traditional classification algorithms perform poorly in detecting malicious apps. As a result, in this study, we developed a meta-learning approach based on the forest penalizing attribute (FPA) classification algorithm for detecting malware applications. In other words, with this research, we investigated how to improve Android malware detection by applying empirical analysis of FPA and its enhanced variants (Cas_FPA and RoF_FPA). The proposed FPA and its enhanced variants were tested using the Malgenome and Drebin Android malware datasets, which contain features gathered from both static and dynamic Android malware analysis. Furthermore, the findings obtained using the proposed technique were compared with baseline classifiers and existing malware detection methods to validate their effectiveness in detecting malware application families. Based on the findings, FPA outperforms the baseline classifiers and existing ML-based Android malware detection models in dealing with the unbalanced family categorization of Android malware apps, with an accuracy of 98.94% and an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.999. Hence, further development and deployment of FPA-based meta-learners for Android malware detection and other cybersecurity threats is recommended.

The strategic significance of software testing in ensuring the success of software development projects is paramount. Comprehensive testing, conducted early and consistently across the development lifecycle, is vital for mitigating defects, especially given the constraints on time, budget, and other resources often faced by development teams. Software defect prediction (SDP) serves as a proactive approach to identifying software components that are most likely to be defective. By predicting these high-risk modules, teams can prioritize thorough testing and inspection, thereby preventing defects from escalating to later stages where resolution becomes more resource intensive. SDP models must be continuously refined to improve predictive accuracy and performance. This involves integrating clean and preprocessed datasets, leveraging advanced machine learning (ML) methods, and optimizing key metrics. Statistical-based and traditional ML approaches have been widely explored for SDP. However, statistical-based models often struggle with scalability and robustness, while conventional ML models face challenges with imbalanced datasets, limiting their prediction efficacy. In this study, innovative decision forest (DF) models were developed to address these limitations. Specifically, this study evaluates the cost-sensitive forest (CS-Forest), forest penalizing attributes (FPA), and functional trees (FT) as DF models. These models were further enhanced using homogeneous ensemble techniques, such as bagging and boosting techniques. The experimental analysis on benchmark SDP datasets demonstrates that the proposed DF models effectively handle class imbalance, accurately distinguishing between defective and non-defective modules. Compared to baseline and state-of-the-art ML and deep learning (DL) methods, the suggested DF models exhibit superior prediction performance and offer scalable solutions for SDP. Consequently, the application of DF-based models is recommended for advancing defect prediction in software engineering and similar ML domains.