Background: Survivors of childhood cancer have an increased risk of therapy-related cardiovascular disease. It is not known whether family history of cardiovascular disease further increases risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes among survivors. Methods: Family history of cardiovascular disease was collected from 1,260 survivors [median age at diagnosis, 8 years (range, 0–23); age at last follow-up, 35 years (range, 18–66)] of childhood cancer in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Multivariable risk models evaluated associations with cardiovascular disease (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 2–4 events) and cardiovascular risk factors. Results: Among survivors exposed to chest-directed radiation and/or anthracycline chemotherapy (n = 824), 7% reported a first-degree family history of heart failure, 19% myocardial infarction, 11% stroke, 26% atherosclerotic disease (myocardial infarction and/or stroke), 62% hypertension, and 31% diabetes mellitus. Eighteen percent of exposed survivors developed heart failure, 9% myocardial infarction, 3% stroke, 11% atherosclerotic disease, 30% hypertension, and 9% diabetes mellitus. Having a first-degree family history of atherosclerotic disease was independently associated with development of treatment-related heart failure [RR, 1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01–1.88; P = 0.04] among exposed survivors. Risk for hypertension was increased among exposed survivors with a first-degree family history of hypertension (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.26–1.92; P < 0.0001) or of any cardiovascular disease [myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06–1.59; P = 0.01)]. Conclusions: Family history of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors independently increased risk of heart failure and hypertension among survivors of childhood cancer exposed to cardiotoxic therapies. Impact: These data show the importance of cardiovascular family history as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in survivors of childhood cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer who use tobacco experience reduced treatment effectiveness, increased risk of recurrence and mortality, and diminished quality of life. Accurate tobacco use documentation for patients with cancer is necessary for appropriate clinical decision making and cancer outcomes research. Our aim was to assess agreement between electronic health record (EHR) smoking status data and cancer registry data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients with cancer seen at University of Florida Health from 2015 to 2018. Structured EHR smoking status was compared with the tumor registry smoking status for each patient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and Kappa statistics were calculated. We used logistic regression to determine if patient characteristics were associated with odds of agreement in smoking status between EHR and registry data. RESULTS: We analyzed 11,110 patient records. EHR smoking status was documented for nearly all (98%) patients. Overall kappa (0.78; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.79) indicated moderate agreement between the registry and EHR. The sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.84), and the specificity was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.97). The logistic regression results indicated that agreement was more likely among patients who were older and female and if the EHR documentation occurred closer to the date of cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Although documentation of smoking status for patients with cancer is standard practice, we only found moderate agreement between EHR and tumor registry data. Interventions and research using EHR data should prioritize ensuring the validity of smoking status data. Multilevel strategies are needed to achieve consistent and accurate documentation of smoking status in cancer care.

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is crucial for preventing HPV-related cancers, yet vaccination rates remain suboptimal, particularly in Florida. Social influence, including family and peer support, may shape parental decisions to vaccinate their children. In this study, we examined the role of social networks (online and offline) in parental intention to vaccinate their 11- to 12-year-old children against HPV. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 746 parents in Florida as part of the Text & Talk trial (2022–2023). Among other questions, parents reported on their intention to vaccinate, perceived social norms, and support received from up to three reported confidants. We performed logistic regression and multivariable analyses to assess the relationship between network support, social norms, and vaccination intent. Results: Seventy percent of parents intended to vaccinate their children. Greater support from the first reported confidant was significantly associated with higher vaccination intention (OR = 1.30, p < 0.0001). Perceived norms among friends (p = 0.01) and higher overall network support (p < 0.0001) were also predictive of intent. The higher the percentage of reported family members, the higher the support received for the vaccine (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Social support, particularly from close confidants and peers, plays a critical role in shaping parental HPV vaccination decisions while accounting for perceived social norms. Public health interventions can leverage peer networks alongside family support to enhance HPV vaccine uptake.

Objective To evaluate a scalable pediatric telemedicine and medication delivery service (TMDS) that extends early healthcare access at households to avert emergencies. Study design A TMDS in Haiti was configured for scalability by triaging severe cases to hospital-level care, non-severe cases with higher clinical uncertainty to in-person exams at households with medication delivery, and non-severe cases with low clinical uncertainty to medication delivery alone. This design was evaluated in a prospective cohort study conducted among pediatric patients (≤10 years). Clinical and operational metrics were compared to a formative reference study in which all non-severe patients received an in-person exam. The primary outcomes were reported rates of clinical improvement/recovery and in-person care seeking at 10-days. Results 1043 cases (41 severe; 1002 non-severe) were enrolled in the scalable TMDS mode and 19% (190) of the non-severe cases received an in-person exam. 382 cases (24 severe, 358 non-severe) were enrolled in the reference study and 94% (338) of the non-severe cases received an in-person exam. At 10-days, rates of improvement were similar for the scalable (97%, 897) and reference (95%, 329) modes. Rates of participants who sought follow-up care were 15% (138) in the scalable mode and 24% (82) in the reference mode. Conclusion In the context of a five-fold reduction of in-person exams, participants in the scalable TMDS mode had non-inferior rates of improvement at 10-days. These findings highlight an innovative and now scalable solution to improve early access to healthcare at households without compromising safety.