Objective To understand COVID-19 characteristics in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and identify high-risk individuals due to their immunocompromised state resulting from the use of disease-modifying treatments. Methods Retrospective and multicenter registry in patients with MS with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and available disease course (mild = ambulatory; severe = hospitalization; and critical = intensive care unit/death). Cases were analyzed for associations between MS characteristics and COVID-19 course and for identifying risk factors for a fatal outcome. Results Of the 326 patients analyzed, 120 were cases confirmed by real-time PCR, 34 by a serologic test, and 205 were suspected. Sixty-nine patients (21.3%) developed severe infection, 10 (3%) critical, and 7 (2.1%) died. Ambulatory patients were higher in relapsing MS forms, treated with injectables and oral first-line agents, whereas more severe cases were observed in patients on pulsed immunosuppressors and critical cases among patients with no therapy. Severe and critical infections were more likely to affect older males with comorbidities, with progressive MS forms, a longer disease course, and higher disability. Fifteen of 33 patients treated with rituximab were hospitalized. Four deceased patients have progressive MS, 5 were not receiving MS therapy, and 2 were treated (natalizumab and rituximab). Multivariate analysis showed age (OR 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04–1.17) as the only independent risk factor for a fatal outcome. Conclusions This study has not demonstrated the presumed critical role of MS therapy in the course of COVID-19 but evidenced that people with MS with advanced age and disease, in progressive course, and those who are more disabled have a higher probability of severe and even fatal disease.

Introduction:We have different treatment alternatives for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis–RRMS–within the so-called platform drugs. It would be desirable to know the ideal drug for each patient. Real clinical practice studies provide us with data on drug efficacy in the medium and long term, safety beyond clinical trials, and can help us to know the patient profile appropriate for each therapy.Material and Methods:An observational multicenter study of real clinical practice in patients with RRMS who were treated with teriflunomide in the Valencian Community, since teriflunomide was authorized in Spain. The database created for this study collects retrospectively patients followed prospectively in the MS clinics.Objectives:To analyze the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide treatment in patients with RRMS under the conditions of real clinical practice, and to identify a patient profile responding to the treatment.Results:We obtained data from 340 patients who received at least one dose of 14 mg teriflunomide. The patients were 69.4% female to 30.6% male, had a mean age of 46.4 years, and a mean time of progression of MS of 11.5 years. The mean pre-teriflunomide relapse rate was 0.4 years, the mean EDSS scorewas 1.98, IgG Oligoclonal bands were present in the CSF of 66.2% of the patients, IgM Oligoclonal bands were present in 46.9%, and the mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was 1.07 lesions per patient at the beginning of treatment. The average number of treatments previously received was 1.04, and 28.53% were naïve. After a follow-up of up to 4 years, a reduction in the annualized and cumulative annualized relapse rate was observed in the first year, in the second year, and in the third year, compared to the pre-treatment year. The EDSS scores were stabilized throughout the follow-up. Likewise, there was a reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions in the 1st and 2nd years compared to the pre-treatment period. Applying different generalized multiple linear regression models, we identified a profile of a responding patient to teriflunomide as a male without IgM oligoclonal bands in the CSF, a previous EDSS score of <3, and more than 5 years duration of MS.

Introduction Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral immunomodulator approved for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) or relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS; depending on the local label), based on extensive evidence from clinical trials and a real-world setting on efficacy, tolerability and patient-reported benefits. The TERICARE study assessed the impact of teriflunomide treatment over 2 years on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and some of the most common and disabling symptoms of MS, such as fatigue and depression. Methods This prospective observational study in Spain included RRMS patients treated with teriflunomide for ≤ 4 weeks. The following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at baseline and every 6 months for 2 years: the 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale version 2 (MSIS-29), the 21-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS-21), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), the Short Form (SF)-Qualiveen and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication v1.4 (TSQM). Annualised relapse rate (ARR), disability progression according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) were also assessed. Results A total of 325 patients were analysed. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 43.2 years (10.4), a mean baseline EDSS score of 1.75 (1.5), a mean number of relapses in the past 2 years of 1.5 (0.7), and 64% had received prior disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Patients showed significant improvements in the psychological domain of MSIS-29 from 35.9 (26.6) at baseline to 29.4 (25.5) at 18 months (p = 0.004) and 29.0 (24.6) at 24 months (p = 0.002). Levels of fatigue and depression were also reduced. After 2 years of treatment with teriflunomide, ARR was reduced to 0.17 (95% CI 0.14–0.21) from the baseline of 0.42 (95% CI 0.38–0.48), representing a 60.1% reduction. Mean EDSS scores remained stable during the study, and 79.9% of patients showed no disability progression. 54.7% of patients achieved NEDA-3 in the first 12 months, which increased to 61.4% during months 12–24. Patients reported increased satisfaction with treatment over the course of the study, regardless of whether they were DMT naive or not. Conclusion Teriflunomide improves psychological aspects of HRQoL and maintains low levels of fatigue and depression. Treatment with teriflunomide over 2 years is effective in reducing ARR and disability progression.

Background: Cognitive impairment has an impact upon the function and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). High-serum neurofilament light-chain (sNfL) levels predict disease progression and are also associated with impaired cognitive performance. This study aimed to assess the attitudes of neurologists toward sNfL testing as regards making therapeutic decisions in clinically and radiologically stable patients experiencing cognitive decline. Methods: A web-based observational study was conducted among neurologists caring for patients with MS. The role of sNfL in therapeutic decisions was assessed through a simulated case scenario describing a 31-year-old woman with relapsing–remitting MS for four years on glatiramer acetate. Her partner reported increased distractibility and difficulties in organizing daily activities over the past 18 months. There was no history of new relapses, and a follow-up brain MRI scan showed no new lesions. Her performance in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test decreased by 8 points from the previous year, with 46 correct answers. The patient had an sNfL level of 21 pg/mL, with no other identified factors that could have altered this value. The participants were tasked with deciding to either escalate treatment or to continue the current treatment and schedule the patient for reassessment in 6–12 months (defined as decisions misaligned with emerging evidence [DMEE]). Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with DMEE. Results: One hundred and sixteen neurologists participated in the study. Almost 50% of the participants (n = 57) opted not to escalate treatment despite high sNfL levels. This was more common among neurologists not fully dedicated to MS care (60.5% vs. 43.6%). The multivariate analysis showed that being a neurologist not fully dedicated to MS (odds ratio [OR] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–5.50; p = 0.04) and having a poor perception of sNfL benefits (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.04; p = 0.01) were associated with DMEE. Conclusions: Neurologists’ lack of full dedication to MS care and limited perception of sNfL’s clinical utility were key factors associated with suboptimal therapeutic decisions in a simulated case of cognitive decline with elevated sNfL. These findings underscore the need for increased education on the role of sNfL to improve evidence-based decision-making in MS management.