Valentina Barletta

Dr. Valentina Barletta


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 November 2017 in Journal of Breath Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBD Biagini
D Biagini
Tommaso LomonacoTommaso Lomonaco
Tommaso Lomonaco
SGS Ghimenti
S Ghimenti
FBF G Bellagambi
F G Bellagambi
MOMassimo Onor
Massimo Onor
Fabio Di FrancescoFabio Di Francesco
Fabio Di Francesco
The analytical performances of needle trap micro-extraction (NTME) coupled with gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry were evaluated by analyzing a mixture of twenty-two representative breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) belonging to different chemical classes (i.e. hydrocarbons, ketones, aldehydes, aromatics and sulfurs). NTME is an emerging technique that guarantees detection limits in the pptv range by pre-concentrating low volumes of sample, and it is particularly suitable for breath analysis. For most VOCs, detection limits between 20 and 500 pptv were obtained by pre-concentrating 25 ml of a humidified standard gas mixture at a flow rate of 15 ml min-1. For all compounds, inter- and intra-day precisions were always below 15%, confirming the reliability of the method. The procedure was successfully applied to the analysis of exhaled breath samples collected from forty heart failure (HF) patients during their stay in the University Hospital of Pisa. The majority of patients (about 80%) showed a significant decrease of breath acetone levels (a factor of 3 or higher) at discharge compared to admission (acute phase) in correspondence to the improved clinical conditions during hospitalization, thus making this compound eligible as a biomarker of HF exacerbation.

2 September 2021 in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BBB. Blank
B. Blank
VBValentina Barletta
Valentina Barletta
HHH. Hu
H. Hu
FPF. Pappa
F. Pappa
WWW. van der Wal
W. van der Wal
Accurate glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) models are required for correcting measurements of mass change in Antarctica and for improving knowledge of the sub‐surface, especially in areas of large current ice loss such as the Amundsen Sea Embayment (ASE). Regionally, seismic and gravity data suggests lateral differences in viscosity (3D). Furthermore, mantle flow laws allow for a stress‐dependent effective viscosity which changes over time (3D‐s). In this study we investigate whether models with 3D/3D‐s have significant effects on the uplift in the region. We use a finite element model with composite rheology consisting of diffusion and dislocation creep, forced by an ice deglaciation model starting in 1900. We use its uplift predictions as synthetic observations to test the performance of 1D model inversion in the presence of viscosity variations. Stress‐dependent rheology results in lower viscosity beneath the load and a more localized uplift pattern. We demonstrate that the background stress from earlier ice load changes can both increase or decrease the influence of stress‐induced effective viscosity changes. For the ASE, fitting 1D models to 3D model uplift results in a best fitting model with viscosity that represents the average of a large area, while for 3D‐s rheology, local viscosity is more influential. 1D models are statistically indistinguishable from 3D/3D‐s viscosity with current GPS stations. However, 3D and 3D‐s models should be taken into account when accurate uplift and gravity rate patterns are needed, as uplift can differ up to 45% compared to 1D models in between existing GPS stations.

8 June 2018 in EP Europace
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMaria Grazia Bongiorni
Maria Grazia Bongiorni
VTVeronica Della Tommasina
Veronica Della Tommasina
VBValentina Barletta
Valentina Barletta
ACAndrea Di Cori
Andrea Di Cori
SRSara Rogani
Sara Rogani
GZGiulio Zucchelli
Giulio Zucchelli
To demonstrate the feasibility and long-term performances of a non-apical Micra pacemaker implantation. Fifty-two consecutive patients underwent Micra implantation, targeting a non-apical site of delivery when feasible. Each patient received a regular follow-up (mean 13 ± 9 months). The first 17 patients were also enrolled in the Micra transcatheter pacing system trial (Group 1); the remaining ones presented broader indications and included post-extraction subjects (Group 2). In 19 of 52 patients (Group 1: 6%, Group 2: 51%; P = 0.002) Micra was implanted because of high-risk characteristics that discouraged the implantation of a traditional pacemaker. In 31 of 52 patients (60%) Micra was implanted in a non-apical location, with a lower rate of single delivery compared with apical sites (48% vs. 81%, P = 0.035), but without any impact on electrical performance. Pacing threshold remained optimal in the majority of patients (94%), regardless of the site of implantation (apical vs. non-apical location: 0.50 vs. 0.52 V/0.24 ms; P = 0.856) and group membership, with only 6% of the subjects showing elevated values (mean 1.92 ± 0.92 V/0.24 ms) at the last follow-up. No device-related adverse events were registered. Micra pacemaker implant is a safe and effective procedure even in a real life cohort of high-risk patients. A non-apical site of implantation is feasible in the majority of patients allowing stable electrical performance at long-term follow-up.

25 July 2020 in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GZGiulio Zucchelli
Giulio Zucchelli
STSilvio Tolve
Silvio Tolve
VBValentina Barletta
Valentina Barletta
ACAndrea Di Cori
Andrea Di Cori
MPMatteo Parollo
Matteo Parollo
MBMaria Grazia Bongiorni
Maria Grazia Bongiorni

12 April 2015 in Echocardiography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VBVitantonio Di Bello
Vitantonio Di Bello
SCSalvatore La Carrubba
Salvatore La Carrubba
LCLorenzo Conte
Lorenzo Conte
IFIacopo Fabiani
Iacopo Fabiani
APAlfredo Posteraro
Alfredo Posteraro
SESiec (Italian Society Of Cardiovascular Echography)
Siec (Italian Society Of Cardiovascular Echography)

15 March 2013 in Echocardiography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VBVitantonio Di Bello
Vitantonio Di Bello
LCLorenzo Conte
Lorenzo Conte
MDMaria Grazia Delle Donne
Maria Grazia Delle Donne
CGCristina Giannini
Cristina Giannini
VBValentina Barletta
Valentina Barletta
MMMario Marzilli
Mario Marzilli