Alessandra Cardinali

Dr. Alessandra Cardinali


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2021 in CATENA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLaura Carretta
Laura Carretta
Paolo TarolliPaolo Tarolli
Paolo Tarolli
ACAlessandra Cardinali
Alessandra Cardinali
Paolo NastaPaolo Nasta
Paolo Nasta
Nunzio RomanoNunzio Romano
Nunzio Romano
RMRoberta Masin
Roberta Masin

1 August 2019 in Journal of Chromatography A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLaura Carretta
Laura Carretta
ACAlessandra Cardinali
Alessandra Cardinali
EMEster Marotta
Ester Marotta
GZGiuseppe Zanin
Giuseppe Zanin
RMRoberta Masin
Roberta Masin

13 September 2021 in International Journal of Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLaura Carretta
Laura Carretta
ACAlessandra Cardinali
Alessandra Cardinali
AOAndrea Onofri
Andrea Onofri
Roberta MasinRoberta Masin
Roberta Masin
GZGiuseppe Zanin
Giuseppe Zanin
This study investigates the adsorption and dissipation of glyphosate and the formation/dissipation of AMPA in non-tilled (NT) and conventionally tilled (CT) soil at 0–5 and 5–20 cm depth. Glyphosate adsorption was mainly related to the different NT and CT soil properties (clay and amorphous Al oxides), whereas an effect of the soil management could not be identified. Glyphosate dissipation was initially fast, and it slowed down later. The initial glyphosate concentration in NT soil at 0–5 cm was significantly lower than the dose applied due to the interception by the weeds and crop residues. AMPA began to form early after treatment and persisted longer than glyphosate. The DT50 range was 8–18 days for glyphosate and 99–250 days for AMPA. Longer glyphosate and AMPA DT50 were observed in NT soil compared to CT soil but, for glyphosate, the difference was significant only at 5–20 cm. Higher glyphosate and AMPA concentrations were detected in NT than in CT soil at the end of the study at 0–5 cm. The differences in glyphosate and AMPA DT50 and persistence were mainly attributable to the influence of different NT and CT soil characteristics. However, other factors could have contributed to the different glyphosate and AMPA dynamics between the soils, like glyphosate wash-off from crop residues on NT soil with the rainfall, the delayed glyphosate return to the soil by weed root exudation or weeds decomposition, and the NT soil compaction which may have reduced the microbial degradation of glyphosate at low concentrations. Graphic

1 August 2014 in Applied Soil Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAlessandra Cardinali
Alessandra Cardinali
PAOLO CARLETTIPAOLO CARLETTI
PAOLO CARLETTI
Serenella NardiSerenella Nardi
Serenella Nardi
GZGiuseppe Zanin
Giuseppe Zanin

16 December 2020 in Environments
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CVCOSTANTINO VISCHETTI
COSTANTINO VISCHETTI
EMElga Monaci
Elga Monaci
CCCRISTIANO CASUCCI
CRISTIANO CASUCCI
ABArianna De Bernardi
Arianna De Bernardi
ACAlessandra Cardinali
Alessandra Cardinali
A soil and an organic biomix (soil/vine branch/garden compost 20/40/40) were used in this lab experiment to evaluate adsorption and degradation parameters for three pesticides (chlorpyrifos, metalaxyl and cymoxanil) used in a vineyard. Adsorption in the biomix material was higher than in the soil for the three pesticides and chlorpyrifos was the most adsorbed pesticide. The role of the organic carbon is essential for enhancing the adsortion of the three pesticides, especially for the most apolar chlorpyrifos. Degradation was generally faster in the biomix material than in the soil although the process was slower in the case of chlorpyrifos if compared with the other two chemicals, due to a more toxic effect of this pesticide on soil microflora and a larger adsorption of this pesticide on the organic biomix that reduces its availability for dissipation. Amendment with cheap and available organic wastes or a grass-covered management of soil in the vineyard could reduce the impact of pesticides in the vineyard ecosystem and contribute to the sustainable management of chemicals in the environment.

12 August 2025 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KTKhaoula Toumi
Khaoula Toumi
AAAbir Arbi
Abir Arbi
Nafissa SoudaniNafissa Soudani
Nafissa Soudani
ALAnastasia Lomadze
Anastasia Lomadze
DHDalila HAOUAS
Dalila HAOUAS
NSNicoleta Alina Suciu
Nicoleta Alina Suciu
Pesticides play a significant role in agriculture, but their leaching into soil and water poses serious environmental risks. This study examines pesticide contamination in surface and groundwater in northern Tunisia, specifically in Kef governorate, involving a survey of 140 farmers to gather data on agricultural practices and pesticide use. Twenty-four pesticides were monitored and utilized within the Pesticide Environmental Risk Indicator (PERI) model to evaluate environmental risk scores for each substance. Soil and water samples were analyzed using a multi-residue method and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Results showed that 50% of the pesticides assessed had an Environmental Risk Score of 5 or higher. Contamination was identified in water and soil, with 18 and 15 pesticide residues, respectively. Notable concentrations included 7.8 µg/L of linuron and flupyradifurone in water and 1718.4 µg/kg of linuron in soil. Commonly detected substances included the insecticide acetamiprid and fungicides like cyflufenamid and penconazole in water, while soil contamination was linked to fungicides metalaxyl and metalaxyl-m, as well as herbicides linuron and s-metolachlor. Factors such as proximity to treated water points and poor packaging management were discussed as risks. The findings emphasize the need for better monitoring and sustainable agricultural practices to mitigate contamination.