The reverse engineering (RE) process is often necessary in today’s engineering and medical industries. Expertise in measurement technology, data processing, and CAD modeling is required to ensure accurate reconstruction of an object’s geometry. However, errors are generated at every stage of geometric reconstruction, affecting the dimensional and geometric accuracy of the final 3D-CAD model. In this article, the geometry of reconstructed models was measured using contact and optical methods. The measurement data representing 2D profiles, 3D point clouds, and 2D images acquired in the reconstruction process were saved to a stereolithography (STL) model. The reconstructed models were then subjected to a CAD modeling process, and the accuracy of the parametric modeling was evaluated by comparing the 3D-CAD model to the 3D-STL model. Based on the results, the model used for clamping and positioning parts to perform the machining process and the connecting rod provided the most accurate mapping errors. These models represented deviations within ±0.02 mm and ±0.05 mm. The accuracy of CAD modeling for the turbine blade model and the pelvis part was comparable, presenting deviations within ±0.1 mm. However, the helical gear and the femur models showed the highest deviations of about ±0.2 mm. The procedures presented in the article specify the methods and resolution of the measurement systems and suggest CAD modeling strategies to minimize reconstruction errors. These results can be used as a starting point for further tests to optimize CAD modeling procedures based on the obtained measurement data.

Due to the rapid advancements in coordinate measuring systems, data processing software, and additive manufacturing (AM) techniques, it has become possible to create copies of existing models through the reverse engineering (RE) process. However, the lack of precise estimates regarding the accuracy of the RE process—particularly at the measurement, reconstruction, and computer-aided design (CAD) modeling stages—poses significant challenges. Additionally, the assessment of dimensional and geometrical errors during the manufacturing stage using AM techniques limits the practical implementation of product replicas in the industry. This paper provides an estimation of the errors encountered in the RE process and the AM stage of various models. It includes examples of an electrical box, a lampshade for a standing lamp, a cover for a vacuum unit, and a battery cover. The geometry of these models was measured using a GOM Scan 1 (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany). Following the measurement process, data processing was performed, along with CAD modeling, which involved primitive detection, profile extraction, and auto-surface methods using Siemens NX 2406 software (Siemens Digital Industries, Plano, TX, USA). The models were produced using a Fortus 360-mc 3D printer (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) with ABS-M30 material. After fabrication, the models were scanned using a GOM Scan 1 scanner to identify any manufacturing errors. The research findings indicated that overall, 95% of the points representing reconstruction errors are within the maximum deviation range of ±0.6 mm to ±1 mm. The highest errors in CAD modeling were attributed to the auto-surfacing method, overall, 95% of the points are within the average range of ±0.9 mm. In contrast, the lowest errors occurred with the detect primitives method, averaging ±0.6 mm. Overall, 95% of the points representing the surface of a model made using the additive manufacturing technology fall within the deviation range ±0.2 mm on average. The findings provide crucial insights for designers utilizing RE and AM techniques in creating functional model replicas.

The zygomatic bone area experiences frequent mechanical damage in the middle craniofacial region, including the orbital floor. The orbital floor bone is very thin, ranging from 0.74 mm to 1.5 mm. Enhancing digitization, reconstruction, and CAD modeling procedures is essential to improving the visualization of this structure. Achieving a homogeneous surface with high manufacturing accuracy is crucial for developing precise surgical models and tools for creating titanium mesh implants to reconstruct the orbital floor geometry. This article improved the accuracy of reconstruction and CAD modeling using the example of the development of a prototype implant to replace the zygomatic bone and a tool to form the geometry of the titanium mesh within the geometry of the orbital floor. The masked stereolithography (mSLA) method was used in the model manufacturing process because it is low-cost and highly accurate. Two manufacturing modes (standard and ultra-light) were tested on an Anycubic Photon M3 Premium 3D printer to determine which mode produced a more accurate representation of the geometry. To verify the geometric accuracy of the manufactured models, a GOM Scan1 structured light scanner was used. In the process of evaluating the accuracy of the model preparation, the maximum deviation, mean deviation, range and standard deviation were determined. The maximum deviations for anatomical structures created using the normal mode ranged from ±0.6 mm to ±0.7 mm. In contrast, models produced with the ultra-light mode showed deviations of ±0.5 mm to ±0.6 mm. Furthermore, the results indicate that the ultra-light mode offers better surface accuracy for die and stamp models. More than 70% of the surface of the models is within the deviation range of ±0.3 mm, which is sufficient for planning surgical procedures. However, the guidelines developed in the presented publication need to optimize the CAD process and select 3D-printing parameters to minimize deviations, especially at the edges of manufactured models.

Reverse engineering (RE) is essential in the automotive and aerospace industries for reconstructing high-precision components, such as exhaust valves, when design documentation is unavailable. However, different measurement methods introduce varied errors that can affect engine performance and safety. This study presents a comparative analysis of contact and optical measurement systems—specifically the CMM Accura II (ZEISS Group, Oberkochen, Germany), Mahr MarSurf XC 20 (Esslingen am Neckar, Germany), GOM Scan 1 (ZEISS/GOM, Braunschweig/Oberkochen, Germany) and MCA-II with an MMD×100 laser head (Nikon Metrology, Leuven, Belgium)—to assess their accuracy in reconstructing exhaust valve geometry. The research procedure involved measuring global surface deviations and critical functional parameters, including stem diameter, straightness, and seat angle. The results indicate that tactile methods (CMM and Mahr) provide significantly higher accuracy and lower dispersion than optical methods. The Mahr system was the most effective for stem precision, while the CMM was the only system to pass the seat angle tolerance requirement unambiguously. In contrast, the MCA-II laser system failed to meet the required precision–mechanical tolerances. The findings suggest that an optimal industrial strategy should adopt a hybrid methodology: utilizing rapid optical scanning (GOM) for general geometry and high-precision tactile systems (CMM, Mahr) for critical functional features. This approach can reduce total inspection time by 30–40% while ensuring technical safety and preventing catastrophic engine failures.