In the original belief function (BF) theory, a precise-valued belief structure has been widely used to represent uncertain information. However, this mentioned belief structure is difficult to effectively measure the specific hesitant situation, especially when decision makers have a set of possible values for the belief assignments of focal elements. In order to model the hesitant nature of the behavior of people to make a decision under uncertainty, we propose a hesitant fuzzy belief structure (HFBS) that is based on the BF theory and the recent hesitant fuzzy set theory. We also present the novel rule of combination of HFBS that is used and evaluated in a wearable human activity recognition (HAR) system coupled with an extreme learning machine. The evaluation of this new HFBS approach is done from two benchmark datasets. We clearly show its effectiveness and its superiority compared to various methods used classically for the wearable HAR.

Due to the corruptions or noises that existed in real-world data sets, the affinity graphs constructed by the classical spectral clustering-based subspace clustering algorithms may not be able to reveal the intrinsic subspace structures of data sets faithfully. In this article, we reconsidered the data reconstruction problem in spectral clustering-based algorithms and proposed the idea of “relation reconstruction.” We pointed out that a data sample could be represented by the neighborhood relation computed between its neighbors and itself. The neighborhood relation could indicate the true membership of its corresponding original data sample to the subspaces of a data set. We also claimed that a data sample’s neighborhood relation could be reconstructed by the neighborhood relations of other data samples; then, we suggested a much different way to define affinity graphs consequently. Based on these propositions, a sparse relation representation (SRR) method was proposed for solving subspace clustering problems. Moreover, by introducing the local structure information of original data sets into SRR, an extension of SRR, namely structured sparse relation representation (SSRR) was presented. We gave an optimization algorithm for solving SRR and SSRR problems and analyzed its computation burden and convergence. Finally, plentiful experiments conducted on different types of databases showed the superiorities of SRR and SSRR.