(1) Background: This study aimed to compare the shaping abilities of modern minimally invasive endodontic systems using natural teeth and 3D-printed resin replicas. These replicas offer a standardized approach for studying root canal preparation while eliminating the variability and scarcity of natural teeth. (2) Methods: Eleven mandibular molars with Vertucci class IV anatomy and their 3D-printed replicas (n = 132 canals) were scanned using micro-CT before and after preparation with six rotary systems. Shaping abilities were assessed by comparing volume, surface area, and unprepared areas between natural teeth and their 3D replicas, focusing on the apical third. Statistical analysis included the Shapiro–Wilk test to assess data normality and ANOVA and t-tests to compare different endodontic systems. (3) Results: Both qualitative and quantitative analyses revealed high similarity between natural teeth and 3D replicas. No significant differences in volume or surface area were found except in the apical third, where 3D replicas showed slightly larger increases in volume. (4) Conclusions: 3D resin replicas closely mimic natural teeth and provide a practical tool for assessing the shaping abilities of endodontic systems. This study demonstrates that 3D-printed models are suitable for endodontic research, offering a standardized and accessible alternative to natural teeth.

Background/Objectives: Bacterial biofilms on root surfaces outside the apical foramen are linked to refractory apical periodontitis, as microorganisms can survive in extraradicular areas and cause persistent infections. This study aimed to precisely evaluate the relationship between extraradicular biofilm and persistent periapical periodontitis through an overview of case reports. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and ScienceDirect databases was conducted up to June 2023. Keywords included “extraradicular infection”, “wet canal”, “wet canals”, “extraradicular mineralized biofilms”, and “calculus-like deposit”. Only case reports meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Results: Fifteen cases of extraradicular infection were identified, involving eight women and six men aged between 18 and 60 years. These cases included nine failed treatments confirmed through complementary methods such as histobacteriologic analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Among these, four patients (six teeth) exhibited calculus-like deposits. Conclusions: Extraradicular biofilm is strongly associated with failed endodontic treatments, leading to persistent infections. A structured decision-making approach is essential. Before considering apical surgery, clinicians should prioritize intraradicular infection control through thorough irrigation, antimicrobial medicaments, and adjunctive disinfection techniques. When extraradicular biofilms or mineralized calculus are present, and symptoms persist after optimal intracanal disinfection, apical surgery should be performed.

Background/Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate current endodontic practice patterns and the adoption of newer technologies among dentists, endodontic specialists, and postgraduate students in Spain and Latin America. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured 30-item questionnaire covering demographics, training, technology adoption (NiTi instrumentation, magnification, CBCT, irrigation adjuncts, bioceramic sealers), obturation techniques, irrigant selection, and clinical procedures. The survey was distributed through a professional Instagram account and WhatsApp groups of dentists, specialists, and postgraduate students. Participation was voluntary, anonymous, and restricted to qualified professionals. Data were collected via Google Forms, cleaned, and grouped into Spain, Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Southern Cone & Andes (Argentina, Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia), and other countries. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and intergroup comparisons were performed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 1358 valid responses were analyzed, distributed as follows: Spain (219), Mexico (353), Venezuela (162), Colombia (108), Southern Cone & Andes (260), and other countries (256). Most respondents (62.8%) had ≤10 years of experience, and 61.2% reported postgraduate training. Loupes (55.4%) were the most frequent magnification system, followed by microscopes (18.6%). Sodium hypochlorite (98.3%) was the irrigant of choice, commonly used with EDTA (83.5%) and, to a lesser extent, chlorhexidine (33.4%). Sonic (83.2%) and ultrasonic (52.9%) activation were frequent. Bioceramic sealers were used by 18.9%, while calcium hydroxide medication was applied by 37.4%. Specialists and master-level clinicians showed greater use of rotary NiTi systems, CBCT, magnification, and bioceramic sealers, whereas general practitioners relied more on manual instrumentation and single-cone obturation. Success was mainly verified by combined clinical and radiographic evaluation (86.7%). Spain demonstrated higher adoption of microscopes, warm vertical compaction, and CBCT. Conclusions: Core practices such as sodium hypochlorite irrigation and rubber dam use were widespread, while advanced technologies and irrigant protocols varied with training level and region. Continuous education remains essential to promote evidence-based practice and reduce disparities in endodontic innovation.