(1) Background: During IVF (in vitro fertilization), a proper endometrium thickness is one of the most difficult parameters to achieve and one of the most important prognostic factors of the success rate. One major problem is the high cancelation percentage in frozen embryo transfer cycles. The focus on the adjuvant methods for improving endometrium thickness is an on-going subject of interest. (2) Methods: This prospective single-arm self-control study was conducted in an IVF centre in Oradea, Romania. The patients were divided into two groups. The control group included 51 patients with at least one attempt to transfer a good-quality blastocyst, but the endometrial thickness did not surpass 7 mm under standard endometrial preparation protocol with oestradiol and with adjuvant therapy (other than PRP, such as aspirin, vitamin C, and vitamin E), and the study group included the same 51 patients that had the embryo transfer performed under the same standard endometrial preparation protocol with oestradiol preparation protocol and intrauterine PRP infusion. (3) Results: In our study, the PRP treatment had a positive impact on the parameters that were followed for the evaluation of the success rate of the embryo transfer procedure. The endometrial thickness (an increase in endometrial thickness by 0.6 mm after PRP treatment with p = 0.0001) and the clinical pregnancy rate (having a MD ± SD of 0 ± 0.38 before PRP treatment and with an increase to 0.5 ± 0.1 after the PRP treatment, p = 0.0004) were statistically significant (4) Conclusions: PRP has a positive effect in promoting endometrial proliferation, improving embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate for women with thin endometrium.

Perioperative analgesia for cesarean section aims to ensure the mother’s comfort, facilitate a smooth surgical experience, and promote a successful recovery. One-hundred-ninety patients were enrolled in a randomized double-blind study designed to assess the quality of perioperative analgesia, level of satisfaction, and incidence of adverse reactions in elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia when fentanyl or morphine was added to bupivacaine. Two treatment groups comprising 173 subjects were compared in the per-protocol analysis: F (fentanyl, standard dose 25 μg) and M (morphine, standard dose 100 μg). Numerical pain scores were recorded perioperatively for 72 h (both at rest and on mobilization), with overall postoperative satisfaction and analgesic-related side effects. The patients in the morphine group had significantly better pain management (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001) and higher level of satisfaction (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001). The latter was related to the greater need for rescue medication in the fentanyl group (OR = 4.396; p = 0.019). On the other hand, fentanyl had significantly fewer non-life-threatening side effects, such as high-intensity pruritus (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001), nausea (OR = 0.324; p = 0.019), vomiting and dizziness upon first mobilization (OR = 0.256; p < 0.001). It remains for future clinical trials to help establish doses that will tilt the scale to one side or the other.

Background and Objectives: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) affects 10% of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), spurring exploration into tailored treatments to enhance implantation rates. Maternal immune tolerance towards embryos, particularly killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) on natural killer (NK) cells, is a focal point in RIF research. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study, conducted at fertility clinic in Oradea, Romania, involved 65 infertile couples undergoing IVF treatment between January 2022 and December 2023. Couples were divided into two groups: KIR AA (Group A) and KIR Bx (Group B). Results: Factors such as age, type of infertility, oocytes retrieved, embryos produced, pregnancy rates in Group A without and with immunomodulatory treatment were documented. Group A, receiving immunomodulatory treatment, achieved a pregnancy rate of 47.8%, significantly higher than the 23.73% rate without treatment (p = 0.008). Group B had a higher mean patient age than Group A. However, miscarriage rates did not significantly differ between Group A with treatment and Group B (p = 0.2457), suggesting comparable outcomes with immunomodulation. Conclusions: The impact of immunological factors on recurrent implantation failure is being more and more emphasized and warrants the attention of specialists in human reproduction. Uterine natural killers and their function though KIR receptors deserve particular attention as immunomodulatory treatment may improve pregnancy rates in patients with KIR AA haplotype.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to explore the preoperative factors related to early mobilization and length of stay (LOS) after total hip arthroplasty and the benefits of the anterior approach over the traditional lateral approach. Materials and Methods: Every patient benefits from information regarding details of the surgery approach, possible intra, and postoperative complications, post-operator medical care, and steps in the early mobilization protocol. The patient underwent a pre-anesthetic evaluation, was checked for preoperatory vital function, and was reevaluated for mobilization at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 96 h after total hip arthroplasty using the anterior versus lateral approach. Results: The result of the statistical calculations indicates the independent negative risk factors for reaching the mobilization target: age with a coefficient of −0.046, p = 0.0154 and lateral approach with a relative risk of 0.3802 (95% CI: 0.15–0.90), p = 0.0298. Statistical data concerning the length of stay (LOS) showed significant differences in the total days spent in the hospital. The patients who were operated on using the lateral approach presented a higher body mass index than those with the anterior approach, but this difference did not reach the threshold of statistical significance. Conclusions: In our study, patient mobilization is crucial to reduce LOS.

Background: Spinal anesthesia is considered the method of choice for elective cesarean sections; however, it is not without maternal–fetal risks. Materials and Methods: This study compared the effects on maternal hemodynamics of intrathecal administration of fentanyl or morphine in parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, with doses varied between 7.5 and 11 mg, depending on the patient’s height. Data from a cohort of 170 parturients were analyzed. The administered doses were intrathecal morphine at 0.1 mL (100 µg, solution of 1 mg/mL) or fentanyl at 0.25 mL (25 µg, solution of 50 µg/mL). This study included 80 patients in the fentanyl (F) group and 90 in the morphine (M) group. Results: Group F showed significantly higher post-intervention systolic blood pressure values than group M (95.30 ± 12.99 mmHg vs. 90.58 ± 14.75 mmHg, p = 0.032). The incidence of vomiting was significantly less frequent in group F compared to group M (1, 1.3% vs. 10, 11.1%, p = 0.011). The total dose of ephedrine required for hypotension correction was significantly lower in the F group (12.75 ± 13.26 mg vs. 17.72 ± 16.73 mg, p = 0.035). Conclusions: The addition of fentanyl as an adjuvant alongside the local anesthetic in cesarean section is associated with enhanced hemodynamic stability compared to morphine, requiring lower doses of ephedrine and contributing to increased patient safety during elective cesarean surgery.

Background/Objectives: Spinal anesthesia, frequently used in cesarean deliveries, can have a significant impact on newborns. This study aims to evaluate the effects of spinal anesthesia with morphine or fentanyl as adjuvants on neonatal outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted over a specific period on 170 newborns delivered via cesarean section at the Pelican Clinic, Medicover Hospital, Romania. The neonatal parameters assessed included Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and heart rate in two groups of newborns whose mothers underwent spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine combined with either morphine or fentanyl (group M_n and group F_n). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 29.0.2.0 (20)). Results: Newborns in the M_n group had significantly higher Apgar scores at 1 min compared to those in the F_n group (9.63 ± 0.57 vs 9.40 ± 0.65, p = 0.010); however, at 5 min, the scores were comparable between groups. Regarding oxygen saturation, male neonates born to mothers who received morphine had significantly higher values than those in the fentanyl group (96.08 ± 4.14% vs. 94.50 ± 4.36%, p = 0.026), whereas no significant differences were observed in female neonates. Conclusions: The use of morphine in maternal spinal anesthesia may improve immediate neonatal adaptation, particularly in male newborns.