In the modern world, the systems getting smarter leads to a rapid increase in the usage of electricity, thereby increasing the load on the grids. The utilities are forced to meet the demand and are under stress during the peak hours due to the shortfall in power generation. The abovesaid deficit signifies the explicit need for a strategy that reduces the peak demand by rescheduling the load pattern, as well as reduces the stress on grids. Demand-side management (DSM) uses several algorithms for proper reallocation of loads, collectively known as demand response (DR). DR strategies effectively culminate in monetary benefits for customers and the utilities using dynamic pricing (DP) and incentive-based procedures. This study attempts to analyze the DP schemes of DR such as time-of-use (TOU) and real-time pricing (RTP) for different load scenarios in a smart grid (SG). Centralized and distributed algorithms are used to analyze the price-based DR problem using RTP. A techno-economic analysis was performed by using particle swarm optimization (PSO) and the strawberry (SBY) optimization algorithms used in handling the DP strategies with 109, 1992, and 7807 controllable industrial, commercial, and residential loads. A better optimization algorithm to go along with the pricing scheme to reduce the peak-to-average ratio (PAR) was identified. The results demonstrate that centralized RTP using the SBY optimization algorithm helped to achieve 14.80%, 21.7%, and 21.84% in cost reduction and outperformed the PSO.

In this paper, the optimal dynamic scheduling of electric vehicles (EVs) in a parking lot (PL) is proposed to minimize the charging cost. In static scheduling, the PL operator can make the optimal scheduling if the demand, arrival, and departure time of EVs are known well in advance. If not, a static charging scheme is not feasible. Therefore, dynamic charging is preferred. A dynamic scheduling scheme means the EVs may come and go at any time, i.e., EVs’ arrival is dynamic in nature. The EVs may come to the PL with prior appointments or not. Therefore, a PL operator requires a mechanism to charge the EVs that arrive with or without reservation, and the demand for EVs is unknown to the PL operator. In general, the PL uses the first-in-first serve (FIFS) method for charging the EVs. The well-known optimization techniques such as particle swarm optimization and shuffled frog leaping algorithms are used for the EVs’ dynamic scheduling scheme to minimize the grid’s charging cost. Moreover, a microgrid is also considered to reduce the charging cost further. The results obtained show the effectiveness of the proposed solution methods.

A Comprehensve Review on the Modern Power System Reliability Assessment

Demand response programs can effectively handle the smart grid’s increasing energy demand and power imbalances. In this regard, price-based DR (PBDR) and incentive-based DR (IBDR) are two broad categories of demand response in which incentives for consumers are provided in IBDR to reduce their demand. This work aims to implement the IBDR strategy from the perspective of the service provider and consumers. The relationship between the different entities concerned is modelled. The incentives offered by the service provider (SP) to its consumers and the consumers’ reduced demand are optimized using Stackelberg–particle swarm optimization (SPSO) as a bi-level problem. Furthermore, the system with a grid operator, the industrial consumers of the grid operator, the service provider and its consumers are analyzed from the service provider’s viewpoint as a tri-level problem. The benefits offered by the service provider to its customers, the incentives provided by the grid operator to its industrial customers, the reduction of customer demand, and the average cost procured by the grid operator are optimized using SPSO and compared with the Stackelberg-distributed algorithm. The problem was analyzed for an hour and 24 h in the MATLAB environment. Besides this, sensitivity analysis and payment analysis were carried out in order to delve into the impact of the demand response program concerning the change in customer parameters.