Lorenzo Gai

Prof. Lorenzo Gai

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 July 2023 in Finance Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LGLorenzo Gai
Lorenzo Gai
MBMarco Bellucci
Marco Bellucci
MBMario Biggeri
Mario Biggeri
LFLucia Ferrone
Lucia Ferrone
FIFederica Ielasi
Federica Ielasi

3 March 2025 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLorenzo Gai
Lorenzo Gai
CACarmelo Algeri
Carmelo Algeri
FIFederica Ielasi
Federica Ielasi
MMMaria Manganiello
Maria Manganiello
This study investigates the factors influencing the success of sustainability-oriented equity crowdfunding campaigns by analyzing a dataset of 771 campaigns from Italian platforms between 2014 and 2021. The findings indicate that while projects with a sustainability focus tend to achieve better outcomes, their success is contingent on variables such as the economic sector of the proposing company and investor concerns regarding misleading claims about environmental, social, and governance practices. Notably, professional investors play a critical role in early-stage financing, initiating information cascades that drive broader investor participation. Furthermore, the COVID-19 crisis appears to have heightened investor interest in sustainability, further solidifying equity crowdfunding as a viable financing tool for ventures with environmental and social objectives. By identifying the key factors that drive the success of sustainability-oriented campaigns, this study offers valuable insights for entrepreneurs, investors, and policymakers seeking to enhance the role of alternative finance in promoting sustainable innovation.

19 March 2025 in Risks
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPaolo Capelli
Paolo Capelli
LGLorenzo Gai
Lorenzo Gai
FIFederica Ielasi
Federica Ielasi
MTMarco Taddei
Marco Taddei
This study examines the market reaction to the approval of the Nature Restoration Law, a key component of the EU Biodiversity Strategy, and its implications for biodiversity-related financial risks. Using an event study methodology, we analyze the equity price movements of companies listed in the MSCI Europe Index that are equally weighted in relation to the announcement. We select the RepRisk Due Diligence Score, focusing on incidents linked to landscapes, ecosystems, and biodiversity, as a measure of biodiversity risk. At first, it seems that companies with a high RepRisk Due Diligence Score show limited or positive abnormal returns, suggesting that biodiversity risks are already priced for companies that have experienced incidents linked to this issue. Conversely, firms with lower biodiversity risk exposure see null or negative impacts, reflecting heightened investor concerns about new environmental regulations or compliance costs. Although the event does not have a systemic impact on European companies in the index, it seems that some sectors are affected when analyzed using parametric and non-parametric distributions.

9 July 2020 in European Financial Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DCDoriana Cucinelli
Doriana Cucinelli
LGLorenzo Gai
Lorenzo Gai
FIFederica Ielasi
Federica Ielasi

19 November 2010 in Strategic Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LGLorenzo Gai
Lorenzo Gai
FRFederico Rossi
Federico Rossi
ECEdoardo Catelani
Edoardo Catelani

15 June 2026 in SSRN Electronic Journal
Verified
Preprint
Open access
MDMarta Degl'INnocenti
Marta Degl'INnocenti
LGLorenzo Gai
Lorenzo Gai
SZSi Zhou
Si Zhou
YZYue Zhou
Yue Zhou
The rapid and alarming decline of biodiversity poses significant risks to businesses and financial institutions that rely on natural resources derived from plants, animals, and microorganisms. Using an international sample of syndicated loans, we find that firms with greater biodiversity impact and dependency face higher interest rate spreads on bank loans. We examine whether eternal stakeholder pressure and the institutional environment influence how lenders price firms’ biodiversity risks. Biodiversity dependency risk is priced more strongly in countries with stronger environmental institutions and governance quality. We also show that banks adhering to sustainability frameworks such as the Equator Principles apply stricter loan pricing to biodiversity-exposed firms, while only concrete biodiversity mitigation actions by borrowers partially reduce the associated loan spreads. Our results are robust to an instrumental variable approach, alternative measures of biodiversity risk and controlling for firm-level climate risk exposure and Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance.