RIAZ YAR

Prof. RIAZ YAR

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 January 2026 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDavid Bartlett
David Bartlett
STSaoirse O Toole
Saoirse O Toole
VCVince Chen
Vince Chen
MKMarko Kuralt
Marko Kuralt
Marilia BuzalafMarilia Buzalaf
Marilia Buzalaf
ALAdrian Lussi
Adrian Lussi

26 May 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ŁLŁukasz Lassmann
Łukasz Lassmann
AŻAgata Marta Żółtowska
Agata Marta Żółtowska
MTMonika Teślak
Monika Teślak
RYRIAZ YAR
RIAZ YAR
This observational cross-sectional study evaluated the differences in condylar guidance angles during mandibular protrusion and mouth opening using digital axiography and CBCT. A total of 30 healthy subjects (60 TMJs) aged 20–24 years were examined. Mandibular movements were recorded using the Modjaw system, and fossa height was assessed from CBCT images. A statistically significant correlation was observed between condylar angles measured during protrusion and opening (r = 0.57, p < 0.001). Protrusive measurements were more consistent, while opening exhibited greater variability. The results suggest that protrusive movements are more reliable for articulator programming. Digital tools such as Modjaw can enhance precision and workflow efficiency in TMJ diagnostics.

16 September 2020 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
ANAdam Nulty
Adam Nulty
CLChris Lefkaditis
Chris Lefkaditis
PZPatrik Zachrisson
Patrik Zachrisson
QTQuintus Van Tonder
Quintus Van Tonder
RYRIAZ YAR
RIAZ YAR
(1) Introduction: External high volume extraction devices may offer a way to reduce any aerosol particulate generated. The aim of this study was to measure the particle count during dental aerosol procedures and compare the results to when a High Volume Extraction device is used; (2) Methods: A comparative clinical study measuring the amount of PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol particulate with and without the use of an external High Volume Extraction device was undertaken. In total, 10 restorative procedures were monitored with an an industrial Trotec PC220 particle counter. The air sampler was placed at the average working distance of the clinicians involved in the study - 420mm.; (3) Results: In the present study aerosol particulate was recorded at statistically significantly increased levels during dental procedures without an external high volume extraction device versus with the device. The null hypothesis was rejected, in that significant differences were found between the results of the amount of aerosol particle count with and without a High Volume Extraction device.; (4) Conclusion: If the results of the present study are repeated in an in vivo setting, an external high volume suction device may potentially lower the risk of transmission of viral particulate.