The SARS-CoV-2 infection determines the COVID-19 syndrome characterized, in the worst cases, by severe respiratory distress, pulmonary and cardiac fibrosis, inflammatory cytokine release, and immunosuppression. This condition has led to the death of about 2.15% of the total infected world population so far. Among survivors, the presence of the so-called persistent post-COVID-19 syndrome (PPCS) is a common finding. In COVID-19 survivors, PPCS presents one or more symptoms: fatigue, dyspnea, memory loss, sleep disorders, and difficulty concentrating. In this study, a cohort of 117 COVID-19 survivors (post-COVID-19) and 144 non-infected volunteers (COVID-19-free) was analyzed using pyrosequencing of defined CpG islands previously identified as suitable for biological age determination. The results show a consistent biological age increase in the post-COVID-19 population, determining a DeltaAge acceleration of 10.45 ± 7.29 years (+5.25 years above the range of normality) compared with 3.68 ± 8.17 years for the COVID-19-free population (p < 0.0001). A significant telomere shortening parallels this finding in the post-COVID-19 cohort compared with COVID-19-free subjects (p < 0.0001). Additionally, ACE2 expression was decreased in post-COVID-19 patients, compared with the COVID-19-free population, while DPP-4 did not change. In light of these observations, we hypothesize that some epigenetic alterations are associated with the post-COVID-19 condition, particularly in younger patients (< 60 years).

Objectives: The treatment of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is still controversial. In 2019, a new conceptual framework was introduced, distinguishing between patients with a degree of MR “proportionate” to the left ventricular (LV) dilatation and patients in whom the severity of MR is “disproportionate” to the LV dilatation. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with disproportionate vs. proportionate secondary MR who underwent mitral valve (MV) surgery. Methods: From January 2012 to June 2022, 96 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of pure secondary MR and LV dysfunction underwent MV surgery. The patients were divided in two groups, disproportionate vs. proportionate MR, according to echocardiographic parameters. A 5.2 (3.5–7.5) years complete clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed. Results: In the study period, 61 patients with disproportionate and 35 patients with proportionate MR underwent surgical MV repair or MV replacement. The thirty-day outcome was comparable in the two groups. At long-term follow-up, mortality was 5% in the disproportionate group vs. 11% in the proportionate group (p = 0.2), and cardiovascular mortality was 3% vs. 9%, respectively (0.5). Rehospitalization for heart failure was 6% vs. 20% (p = 0.04), and the rate of patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class ≥ III was 8% vs. 26%, respectively (p = 0.01). LV volumes were significantly higher in the proportionate group, thus presenting a lower LV ejection fraction (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). No cases of recurrent MR have been observed. Conclusions: In this first exploratory analysis, patients with disproportionate secondary MR seem to present a possible benefit in terms of mortality and cardiovascular mortality, although not ones reaching statistical significance. Nevertheless, significant advantages were observed in terms of rehospitalization for heart failure, clinical status and symptoms, LV volumes, and LV function. Among patients referred to cardiac surgery, identifying the subset of patients with functional MR, who may obtain more significant advantages from surgery, seems relevant for patient selection, risk stratification, and to predict long-term outcomes.

Background: According to current guidelines, patients with heart valve disease should be followed by Heart Valve Clinics (HVCs). Regular quality analysis is a major prerequisite of an HVC’s program, but few data have been reported so far. Methods: We retrospectively collected patients with isolated, native aortic valve stenosis who had been visited in our HVC at least once between 2021 and 2024. For each outpatient visit, symptoms, physical examination, echocardiographic data, complementary tests, and indications were acquired. Also, adverse events (hospitalization, unplanned procedures, and death) were retrieved. Results: A total of 320 patients were included. Mean visits/patient ratio was 1.2. At the first visit, 69.7% already had severe aortic stenosis, and severe symptoms (NYHA ≥ III) were evident in 24.4%. In addition, 26.5%, 59.1%, 12.8%, and 1.6% were in Généreux stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Overall, 197 (78.5%) and 54 (21.5%) patients received an indication for transcatheter AVR and surgical AVR, respectively. AVR-free survival was 46%, 23%, and 6% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively (mean 8.8 months CI95% 7.7–9.9). Adverse event-free survival was 97.2%, 95.5%, and 85% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: Patients referred to our HVC already had an advanced disease with cardiac damage. Transcatheter AVR was mostly indicated, and it showed excellent short-term results. A low rate of adverse events was seen among patients in follow-up, but the odds of receiving AVR were high and driven by Généreux’s stage. Despite these favorable results, further efforts to sensitize earlier patient referral should be made.