Biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC) are of great interest in the current literature due to improvements in techniques such as liquid biopsy and next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, screening methods vary globally, with multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) predominantly used in the USA and, more recently, the Cologuard Plus; biomarkers such as the Galectins family and septins show promise in early detection. Gut microbiome assessments, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, are under intense exploration. Diagnostic tests, such as circulating DNA analysis via NGS, exhibit effectiveness and are being increasingly adopted. Circulating tumor cells emerge as potential alternatives to traditional methods in terms of diagnosis and prognosis. Predictive biomarkers are well established in guidelines; nonetheless, with the aid of machine learning and artificial intelligence, these biomarkers may be improved. This review critically explores the actual dynamic landscape of CRC biomarkers and future, promising biomarkers involved in screening, diagnosis, and prognosis.

Traditionally, the therapeutic approach to rectal cancer has involved neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection, and, in some cases, adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to present current advances and ongoing controversies in the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), with a particular focus on clarifying the role of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in contemporary treatment strategies. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in Medline/PubMed using various keyword combinations, including “rectal cancer/neoplasia” and“therapy” or “neoadjuvant therapy” or “TNT”, and included articles published between 2015 and 2025. Results: The association of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with preoperative systemic chemotherapy has led to the current concept of total neoadjuvant therapy. The advantages of preoperative chemotherapy include better patient compliance, a decrease in the rate of local recurrence and distant metastases via the early destruction of infra-clinical micrometastases, and higher rates of pathological complete response. All of these have led to the inclusion of this strategy in treatment guidelines for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Conclusions: However, the selection of patients with advanced rectal tumors for optimal therapy requires comprehensive imaging assessments, molecular and genetic testing, and a multidisciplinary team to determine the most appropriate total neoadjuvant therapy approach.

Background and Clinical Significance: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disorder characterized by esophageal dysfunction and dense eosinophilic infiltration. EoE frequently evolves into a fibrostenotic phenotype, in which uncontrolled inflammation drives progressive tissue remodeling. This evolution increases the risk of complex structural complications—most commonly fixed rings and strictures, and, in rare advanced cases, deep mural injury or fistulization—substantially increasing both diagnostic and therapeutic complexity. Case Presentation: This report describes an uncommon presentation of EoE complicated by a blind-ending esophageal fistula, managed successfully through a multidisciplinary strategy integrating pharmacologic therapy, dietary modification, and endoscopic intervention. Conclusions: Nutritional support through gastrostomy, combined with multidisciplinary medical and endoscopic management, can lead to favorable outcomes in EoE complicated by esophageal fistula. Early recognition and individualized management are essential to optimize outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a key component of the treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), both through its direct impact on oncological prognosis and by increasing the likelihood of sphincter-preserving surgery. Oncological prognosis improves dramatically following a complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy. Identifying predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy has been a challenge over the past two decades, and these factors have not been fully identified. This study aimed to analyze the clinical, biological, and therapeutic factors associated with tumor response following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, with the aim of identifying independent predictors of the absence of a complete pathological response and optimizing personalized treatment strategies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included a cohort of 122 patients (81 men and 41 women), with a mean age of 63.5 years, diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer at two centers with expertise in colorectal surgery between January 2018 and December 2023. Patients received neoadjuvant treatment in two regimens: long-course chemoradiotherapy with oral radiosensitizing chemotherapy (82 patients) and total neoadjuvant therapy consisting of chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (40 patients). A series of clinical, biological, and therapeutic variables was analyzed for their association with pathological responses. Results: According to the Ryan score, the overall complete response rate following neoadjuvant therapy was 17.2%. pCR was observed more frequently in patients treated with total neoadjuvant therapy than in those treated with standard chemoradiotherapy. Elevated pre-treatment CEA levels were independently associated with a higher risk of unfavorable tumor response. The radiation dose and interval between completion of radiotherapy and surgery were significantly associated with tumor regression. Conclusions: These results underscore the importance of personalizing neoadjuvant therapy to improve cancer prognosis. Furthermore, optimizing tumor regression could lead to the potential expansion of sphincter-preserving resection techniques, which would have a direct and significant impact on the quality of life of these patients.