Louis Kouadio

Dr. Louis Kouadio

Centre for Applied Climate Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2018 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LKLouis Kouadio
Louis Kouadio
Ravinesh DeoRavinesh Deo
Ravinesh Deo
VBVivekananda Byrareddy
Vivekananda Byrareddy
JAJan F. Adamowski
Jan F. Adamowski
SMShahbaz Mushtaq
Shahbaz Mushtaq
VNVan Phuong Nguyen
Van Phuong Nguyen

1 June 2015 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ACAston Chipanshi
Aston Chipanshi
YZYinsuo Zhang
Yinsuo Zhang
LKLouis Kouadio
Louis Kouadio
NNNathaniel K. Newlands
Nathaniel K. Newlands
ADAndrew M. Davidson
Andrew M. Davidson
GRGordon Reichert
Gordon Reichert
Early warning information on crop yield and production are very crucial for both farmers and decision-makers. In this study, we assess the skill and the reliability of the Integrated Canadian Crop Yield Forecaster (ICCYF), a regional crop yield forecasting tool, at different temporal (i.e. 1–3 months before harvest) and spatial (i.e. census agricultural region – CAR, provincial and national) scales across Canada. A distinct feature of the ICCYF is that it generates in-season yield forecasts well before the end of the growing season and provides a probability distribution of the forecasted yields. The ICCYF integrates climate, remote sensing derived vegetation indices, soil and crop information through a physical process-based soil water budget model and statistical algorithms. The model was evaluated against yield survey data of spring wheat, barley and canola during the 1987–2012 period. Our results showed that the ICCYF performance exhibited a strong spatial pattern at both CAR and provincial scales. Model performance was better from regions with a good coverage of climate stations and a high percentage of cropped area. On average, the model coefficient of determination at CAR level was 66%, 51% and 67%, for spring wheat, barley and canola, respectively. Skilful forecasts (i.e. model efficiency index>0) were achieved in 70% of the CARs for spring wheat and canola, and 43% for barley (low values observed in CAR with small harvested area). At the provincial scale, the mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of the September forecasts ranged from 7% to 16%, 7% to14%, and 6% to 14% for spring wheat, barley and canola, respectively. For forecasts at the national scale, MAPE values (i.e. 8%, 5% and 9% for the three respective crops) were considerably smaller than the corresponding historical coefficients of variation (i.e. 17%, 10% and 17% for the three crops). Overall, the ICCYF performed better for spring wheat than for canola and barley at all the three spatial scales. Skilful forecasts were achieved by mid-August, giving a lead time of about 1 month before harvest and about 3–4 months before the final release of official survey results. As such, the ICCYF could be used as a complementary tool for the traditional survey method, especially in areas where it is not practical to conduct such surveys

23 October 2014 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLouis Kouadio
Louis Kouadio
NNNathaniel K. Newlands
Nathaniel K. Newlands
ADAndrew M. Davidson
Andrew M. Davidson
YZYinsuo Zhang
Yinsuo Zhang
ACAston Chipanshi
Aston Chipanshi
Crop yield forecasting plays a vital role in coping with the challenges of the impacts of climate change on agriculture. Improvements in the timeliness and accuracy of yield forecasting by incorporating near real-time remote sensing data and the use of sophisticated statistical methods can improve our capacity to respond effectively to these challenges. The objectives of this study were (i) to investigate the use of derived vegetation indices for the yield forecasting of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from the Moderate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) at the ecodistrict scale across Western Canada with the Integrated Canadian Crop Yield Forecaster (ICCYF); and (ii) to compare the ICCYF-model based forecasts and their accuracy across two spatial scales-the ecodistrict and Census Agricultural Region (CAR), namely in CAR with previously reported ICCYF weak performance. Ecodistricts are areas with distinct climate, soil, landscape and ecological aspects, whereas CARs are census-based/statistically-delineated areas. Agroclimate variables combined respectively with MODIS-NDVI and MODIS-EVI indices were used as inputs for the in-season yield forecasting of spring wheat during the 2000–2010 period. Regression models were built based on a procedure of a leave-one-year-out. The results showed that both agroclimate + MODIS-NDVI and agroclimate + MODIS-EVI performed equally well predicting spring wheat yield at the ECD scale. The mean absolute error percentages (MAPE) of the models selected from both the two data sets ranged from 2% to 33% over the study period. The model efficiency index (MEI) varied between −1.1 and 0.99 and −1.8 and 0.99, respectively for the agroclimate + MODIS-NDVI and agroclimate + MODIS-EVI data sets. Moreover, significant improvement in forecasting skill (with decreasing MAPE of 40% and 5 times increasing MEI, on average) was obtained at the finer, ecodistrict spatial scale, compared to the coarser CAR scale. Forecast models need to consider the distribution of extreme values of predictor variables to improve the selection of remote sensing indices. Our findings indicate that statistical-based forecasting error could be significantly reduced by making use of MODIS-EVI and NDVI indices at different times in the crop growing season and within different sub-regions.

31 August 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLouis Kouadio
Louis Kouadio
MJMoussa El Jarroudi
Moussa El Jarroudi
ZBZineb Belabess
Zineb Belabess
Salah-Eddine LaasliSalah-Eddine Laasli
Salah-Eddine Laasli
MRMd Zohurul Kadir Roni
Md Zohurul Kadir Roni
Rachid LahlaliRachid Lahlali
Rachid Lahlali
Remote sensing technology is vital for precision agriculture, aiding in early issue detection, resource management, and environmentally friendly practices. Recent advances in remote sensing technology and data processing have propelled unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) into valuable tools for obtaining detailed data on plant diseases with high spatial, temporal, and spectral resolution. Given the growing body of scholarly research centered on UAV-based disease detection, a comprehensive review and analysis of current studies becomes imperative to provide a panoramic view of evolving methodologies in plant disease monitoring and to strategically evaluate the potential and limitations of such strategies. This study undertakes a systematic quantitative literature review to summarize existing literature and discern current research trends in UAV-based applications for plant disease detection and monitoring. Results reveal a global disparity in research on the topic, with Asian countries being the top contributing countries (43 out of 103 papers). World regions such as Oceania and Africa exhibit comparatively lesser representation. To date, research has largely focused on diseases affecting wheat, sugar beet, potato, maize, and grapevine. Multispectral, reg-green-blue, and hyperspectral sensors were most often used to detect and identify disease symptoms, with current trends pointing to approaches integrating multiple sensors and the use of machine learning and deep learning techniques. Future research should prioritize (i) development of cost-effective and user-friendly UAVs, (ii) integration with emerging agricultural technologies, (iii) improved data acquisition and processing efficiency (iv) diverse testing scenarios, and (v) ethical considerations through proper regulations.

1 March 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJochen Bundschuh
Jochen Bundschuh
JMJyoti Prakash Maity
Jyoti Prakash Maity
SMShahbaz Mushtaq
Shahbaz Mushtaq
MVMeththika Vithanage
Meththika Vithanage
SSSaman Seneweera
Saman Seneweera
CCChien-Yen Chen
Chien-Yen Chen

10 June 2024 in Nature Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MJMoussa El Jarroudi
Moussa El Jarroudi
LKLouis Kouadio
Louis Kouadio
PDPhilippe Delfosse
Philippe Delfosse
CBClive Bock
Clive Bock
AMAnne-Katrin Mahlein
Anne-Katrin Mahlein
SHSaid Hamdioui
Said Hamdioui