Crash boxes play a vital role in improving vehicle safety by absorbing collision energy and reducing the forces transmitted to occupants. Additive manufacturing (AM) has become a powerful method for developing advanced crash boxes by enabling complex geometries. This review provides a comprehensive examination of recent progress in AM crash boxes, with a focus on three key aspects: geometric design innovations, material behavior, and manufacturing techniques. The review investigates the influence of various AM-enabled structural configurations, including tubular, origami-inspired, lattice, and bio-inspired designs, on crashworthiness performance. Among these, bio-inspired structures exhibit superior energy absorption characteristics, achieving a mean specific energy absorption $\left(SEA\right)$ of 21.51 J/g. Material selection is also explored, covering polymers, fiber-reinforced polymers, metals, and multi-material structures. Metallic AM crash boxes demonstrate the highest energy absorption capacity, with a mean $SEA$ of 28.65 J/g. In addition, the performance of different AM technologies is evaluated, including Stereolithography (SLA), Material Jetting (MJT), Selective Laser Melting (SLM), Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), and hybrid manufacturing techniques. Among these, crash boxes produced by SLM show the most favorable energy absorption performance, with a mean $SEA$ of 16.50 J/g. The findings presented in this review offer critical insights to guide future research and development in the design and manufacturing of next-generation AM crash boxes intended to enhance vehicle safety.

Crash boxes play a crucial role in automotive safety by absorbing impact energy during collisions. The advancement of additive manufacturing (AM), particularly Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), has enabled the fabrication of geometrically complex and lightweight crash boxes. This study presents a comparative evaluation of the crashworthiness performance of five FDM materials, namely, PLA+, PLA-ST, PLA-LW, PLA-CF, and PETG, across four structural configurations: Single-Cell Circle (SCC), Multi-Cell Circle (MCC), Single-Cell Square (SCS), and Multi-Cell Square (MCS). Quasi-static axial compression tests are conducted to assess the specific energy absorption $\left(SEA\right)$ and crush force efficiency $\left(CFE\right)$ of each material–geometry combination. Among the materials, PLA-CF demonstrates superior performance, with the MCC configuration achieving an $SEA$ of 22.378 ± 0.570 J/g and a $CFE$ of 0.732 ± 0.016. Multi-cell configurations consistently outperformed single-cell designs across all materials. To statistically quantify the influence of material and geometry on crash performance, a two-factor ANOVA was performed, highlighting geometry as the most significant factor across all evaluated metrics. Additionally, a comparative test with aluminum 6063-T5 demonstrates that PLA-CF offers comparable crashworthiness, with advantages in mass reduction, reduced $PCF$, and enhanced design flexibility inherent in AM. These findings provide valuable guidance for material selection and structural optimization in FDM-based crash boxes.