Paolo Carrer

Dr. Paolo Carrer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2014 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Otto HanninenOtto Hanninen
Otto Hanninen
AKAnne B. Knol
Anne B. Knol
MJMatti Jantunen
Matti Jantunen
TLTek-Ang Lim
Tek-Ang Lim
ACAndré Conrad
André Conrad
OMOdile C.L. Mekel
Odile C.L. Mekel
Background: Environmental health effects vary considerably with regard to their severity, type of disease, and duration. Integrated measures of population health, such as environmental burden of disease (EBD), are useful for setting priorities in environmental health policies and research. This review is a summary of the full Environmental Burden of Disease in European countries (EBoDE) project report. Objectives: The EBoDE project was set up to provide assessments for nine environmental risk factors relevant in selected European countries (Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands). Methods: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were estimated for benzene, dioxins, secondhand smoke, formaldehyde, lead, traffic noise, ozone, particulate matter (PM2.5), and radon, using primarily World Health Organization data on burden of disease, (inter)national exposure data, and epidemiological or toxicological risk estimates. Results are presented here without discounting or age-weighting. Results: About 3–7% of the annual burden of disease in the participating countries is associated with the included environmental risk factors. Airborne particulate matter (diameter ≤ 2.5 μm; PM2.5) is the leading risk factor associated with 6,000–10,000 DALYs/year and 1 million people. Secondhand smoke, traffic noise (including road, rail, and air traffic noise), and radon had overlapping estimate ranges (600–1,200 DALYs/million people). Some of the EBD estimates, especially for dioxins and formaldehyde, contain substantial uncertainties that could be only partly quantified. However, overall ranking of the estimates seems relatively robust. Conclusions: With current methods and data, environmental burden of disease estimates support meaningful policy evaluation and resource allocation, including identification of susceptible groups and targets for efficient exposure reduction. International exposure monitoring standards would enhance data quality and improve comparability. Citation: Hänninen O, Knol AB, Jantunen M, Lim TA, Conrad A, Rappolder M, Carrer P, Fanetti AC, Kim R, Buekers J, Torfs R, Iavarone I, Classen T, Hornberg C, Mekel OC, EBoDE Working Group. 2014. Environmental burden of disease in Europe: assessing nine risk factors in six countries. Environ Health Perspect 122:439–446; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206154

1 April 2021 in International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PWPeder Wolkoff
Peder Wolkoff
KAKenichi Azuma
Kenichi Azuma
PCPaolo Carrer
Paolo Carrer

1 February 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMCorinne Mandin
Corinne Mandin
MTMarilena Trantallidi
Marilena Trantallidi
Andrea CattaneoAndrea Cattaneo
Andrea Cattaneo
Nuno CanhaNuno Canha
Nuno Canha
VMVictor G. Mihucz
Victor G. Mihucz
JBJohn Bartzis
John Bartzis

Ioannis SakellarisIoannis Sakellaris
Ioannis Sakellaris
Dikaia SaragaDikaia Saraga
Dikaia Saraga
CMCorinne Mandin
Corinne Mandin
CRCélina Roda
Célina Roda
SFSerena Fossati
Serena Fossati
PBPhilomena Margaretha Bluyssen
Philomena Margaretha Bluyssen
Indoor environmental conditions (thermal, noise, light, and indoor air quality) may affect workers’ comfort, and consequently their health and well-being, as well as their productivity. This study aimed to assess the relations between perceived indoor environment and occupants’ comfort, and to examine the modifying effects of both personal and building characteristics. Within the framework of the European project OFFICAIR, a questionnaire survey was administered to 7441 workers in 167 “modern” office buildings in eight European countries (Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain). Occupants assessed indoor environmental quality (IEQ) using both crude IEQ items (satisfaction with thermal comfort, noise, light, and indoor air quality), and detailed items related to indoor environmental parameters (e.g., too hot/cold temperature, humid/dry air, noise inside/outside, natural/artificial light, odor) of their office environment. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relations between perceived IEQ and occupants’ comfort. The highest association with occupants’ overall comfort was found for “noise”, followed by “air quality”, “light” and “thermal” satisfaction. Analysis of detailed parameters revealed that “noise inside the buildings” was highly associated with occupants’ overall comfort. “Layout of the offices” was the next parameter highly associated with overall comfort. The relations between IEQ and comfort differed by personal characteristics (gender, age, and the Effort Reward Imbalance index), and building characteristics (office type and building’s location). Workplace design should take into account both occupant and the building characteristics in order to provide healthier and more comfortable conditions to their occupants.

14 March 2015 in Indoor Air
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPhilomena M. Bluyssen
Philomena M. Bluyssen
CRCélina Roda
Célina Roda
CMCorinne Mandin
Corinne Mandin
SFSerena Fossati
Serena Fossati
PCPaolo Carrer
Paolo Carrer
JBJohn Bartzis
John Bartzis

1 April 2017 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDavide Campagnolo
Davide Campagnolo
Dikaia SaragaDikaia Saraga
Dikaia Saraga
Andrea CattaneoAndrea Cattaneo
Andrea Cattaneo
Andrea SpinazzèAndrea Spinazzè
Andrea Spinazzè
CMCorinne Mandin
Corinne Mandin
JBJohn G. Bartzis
John G. Bartzis