Maria Casillo

Dr. Maria Casillo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 August 2024 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAntonietta Monda
Antonietta Monda
MSMaria Ida de Stefano
Maria Ida de Stefano
IVInes Villano
Ines Villano
SASalvatore Allocca
Salvatore Allocca
MCMaria Casillo
Maria Casillo
Rita PolitoRita Polito
Rita Polito
The prevalence of obesity has become a global health concern, with significant impacts on quality of life and mortality rates. Recent research has highlighted the role of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in driving the obesity epidemic. UPFs undergo extensive processing, often containing high levels of sugars, fats, and additives, while lacking essential nutrients. Studies have linked UPF consumption to obesity and cardiometabolic diseases, underscoring the importance of dietary patterns rich in whole foods. Thus, the aim of this narrative review is to elucidate the correlation between ultra-processed foods and the increased trend of obesity and its related complications. These foods, prevalent in modern diets, contribute to nutritional deficiencies and excessive caloric intake, exacerbating obesity rates. Lifestyle factors such as busy schedules and quick meal management further drive UPF consumption, disrupting hunger regulation and promoting overeating. UPF consumption correlates with adverse health outcomes, including dyslipidemia, hypertension, and insulin resistance. Promoting whole, minimally processed foods and implementing school-based nutrition education programs are crucial steps. Also, numerous challenges exist, including unequal access to healthy foods, the industry’s influence, and behavioral barriers to dietary change. Future research should explore innovative approaches, such as nutrigenomics and digital health technologies, to personalize interventions and evaluate policy effectiveness. Collaboration across disciplines and sectors will be vital to develop comprehensive solutions and improve public health outcomes globally.

16 June 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASalvatore Allocca
Salvatore Allocca
AMAntonietta Monda
Antonietta Monda
AMAntonietta Messina
Antonietta Messina
MCMaria Casillo
Maria Casillo
WSWalter Sapuppo
Walter Sapuppo
Marco La MarraMarco La Marra
Marco La Marra
Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) are interrelated chronic conditions whose global prevalence continues to rise, posing significant clinical and socioeconomic challenges. Their pathophysiological intersection—commonly referred to as “diabesity”—is sustained by a complex interplay of mechanisms, including visceral adipose tissue inflammation, macrophage polarization, disrupted insulin signaling, and adipokine imbalance. These processes contribute to chronic low-grade systemic inflammation, impair pancreatic β-cell function, and exacerbate glucose intolerance. This review critically explores the mechanistic connections between obesity and T2DM, with a focus on recent advances in pharmacological therapies—such as GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists—alongside evidence-based lifestyle modifications and bariatric procedures. By integrating current translational and clinical findings, we aim to provide a comprehensive perspective to support the development of more effective and individualized treatment strategies for diabesity.

23 March 2026 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGirolamo Di Maio
Girolamo Di Maio
MTMaria Giovanna Tafuri
Maria Giovanna Tafuri
MCMaria Casillo
Maria Casillo
AMAntonietta Messina
Antonietta Messina
SASalvatore Allocca
Salvatore Allocca
Vincenzo MondaVincenzo Monda
Vincenzo Monda
Obesity represents a heterogeneous metabolic disorder characterized by substantial interindividual variation in inflammatory status, insulin sensitivity, and cardiometabolic risk. Traditional anthropometric measures fail to capture this metabolic diversity, limiting risk stratification and personalized intervention strategies. This review critically examines nutritional and metabolic biomarkers that reflect the physiological dysregulation underlying obesity, including adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, resistin), inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, TNF-α), insulin resistance indices (HOMA-IR, fasting insulin, HbA1c), and lipid metabolism indicators (LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and liver enzymes such as ALT and GGT). Among these, elevated CRP, reduced adiponectin, and increased HOMA-IR have demonstrated the strongest clinical utility for early metabolic risk identification. We further evaluate emerging biomarkers—including circulating microRNAs, gut microbiota-derived metabolites (short-chain fatty acids, TMAO, lipopolysaccharides), and bile acid profiles—which offer additional mechanistic insight into diet–microbiome–host interactions. We systematically assess the mechanistic basis, clinical relevance, and nutritional modulation of each biomarker class, emphasizing how dietary composition—particularly fatty acid quality, fiber intake, and overall dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet—influences biomarker profiles and metabolic outcomes. Furthermore, we explore how biomarker-based phenotyping enables precision nutrition approaches by identifying individuals most likely to benefit from specific dietary interventions. Integration of multi-biomarker panels with clinical and genetic data holds promise for advancing from population-based dietary guidelines toward individualized nutrition strategies that optimize metabolic health and prevent obesity-related complications. Future research should prioritize validating biomarker-guided intervention frameworks, establishing standardized thresholds across diverse populations, and developing clinically implementable tools for personalized nutritional medicine.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PVParide Vasco
Paride Vasco
SASalvatore Allocca
Salvatore Allocca
CCClaudia Casella
Claudia Casella
FCFrancesco Paolo Colecchia
Francesco Paolo Colecchia
MRMaria Ruberto
Maria Ruberto
Rita PolitoRita Polito
Rita Polito
Background: University students are particularly vulnerable to psychological distress due to the transitional nature of this life phase and increasing academic, social, and financial pressures. Accumulating evidence indicates that lifestyle behaviors—especially nutrition and physical activity—play a critical role in shaping mental health, cognitive functioning, and overall well-being in this population. Methods: The objective of this scoping review was to systematically map the literature on the combined impacts of diet and physical activity on psychological well-being among university students. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, an initial search of three major databases (PubMed, Sciencedirect, and Wiley) yielded 718 articles. After a multi-stage screening process, 39 articles of various designs (including cross-sectional, interventional, and review studies) focusing on non-clinical student populations were included. The studies were then thematically analyzed. Results: While most research explored isolated behaviors, a smaller set of integrated studies revealed synergistic effects, reporting enhanced outcomes in mental health and quality of life. Notably, several articles proposed practical strategies—such as app-based tools, structured wellness initiatives, and interdisciplinary educational programs—as effective means to support healthier habits. Conclusions: The evidence strongly suggests that universities should prioritize holistic, multi-component wellness strategies over siloed, single-behavior initiatives. Developing integrated programs that combine nutritional education and physical activity support represents a practical and effective approach to enhance student well-being.

21 March 2024 in Behavioral Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CICiro Rosario Ilardi
Ciro Rosario Ilardi
AMAntonietta Monda
Antonietta Monda
AIAlessandro Iavarone
Alessandro Iavarone
SCSergio Chieffi
Sergio Chieffi
MCMaria Casillo
Maria Casillo
Marco La MarraMarco La Marra
Marco La Marra
This study explores the interplay between executive functions and body weight, examining both the influence of biological factors, specifically sex, and methodological issues, such as the choice between Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) as the primary anthropometric measure. A total of 386 participants (222 females, mean age = 45.98 years, SD = 17.70) were enrolled, from whom sociodemographic (sex, age, years of formal education) and anthropometric (BMI and WC) data were collected. Executive functions were evaluated using the Frontal Assessment Battery–15 (FAB15). The results showed the increased effectiveness of WC over BMI in examining the relationships between executive functions, sex differences, and body weight. In particular, this study revealed that there was a significant moderating effect of sex at comparable levels of executive functioning. Specifically, women with higher executive performance had lower WCs than their male counterparts, suggesting that executive function has a greater impact on WC in women than in men. Our findings highlight the importance of conducting more in-depth investigations of the complex relationship between cognitive deficits and weight gain, considering confounding variables of behavioral, psychobiological, and neurophysiological origin.

11 September 2025 in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WSWalter Sapuppo
Walter Sapuppo
Davide GiacconiDavide Giacconi
Davide Giacconi
AMAntonietta Monda
Antonietta Monda
AMAntonietta Messina
Antonietta Messina
DSDaniele Saccenti
Daniele Saccenti
Marco La MarraMarco La Marra
Marco La Marra
The use of dietary supplements is widespread among athletes and physically active individuals, yet their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains insufficiently understood. This study investigated the associations between supplement use, physical activity patterns, and HRQoL in a heterogeneous sample of 537 adults engaged in sports at amateur, professional, or recreational levels. Participants completed an online survey assessing demographics, supplement use, physical activity habits, and quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and independent-samples t-tests to explore relationships between supplement use, body mass index (BMI), motivational variables, and HRQoL outcomes. Results indicated that 46.7% of participants reported consuming at least one supplement or substance, with an average of 1.91 products. The primary motivations included performance enhancement (30.7%) and combined performance and aesthetic goals (12.1%). A significant association emerged between supplement use and the consistency of physical activity over time, as well as the individual’s motivation for engaging in exercise. Participants who maintained stable activity levels and those driven by performance or competitive motives were more likely to use supplements. In contrast, individuals exercising primarily for physical and psychological health were less likely to report supplement use. When comparing HRQoL scores, supplement users showed significantly lower levels of impairment due to emotional issues (RE), social functioning (SF), and bodily pain (BP). Among these variables, only Bodily Pain presented a small effect size, suggesting a meaningful difference between users and non-users. These findings highlight that while supplements are commonly used in athletic contexts, their association with improved quality of life is limited, and may even reflect attempts to manage physical discomfort. Further research is needed to clarify the directionality of these relationships and inform safe and evidence-based consumption.