Fuqiang Tian

Dr. Fuqiang Tian


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 August 2022 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHeidi Kreibich
Heidi Kreibich
ALAnne Van Loon
Anne Van Loon
KSKai Schröter
Kai Schröter
PWPhilip J. Ward
Philip J. Ward
Maurizio MazzoleniMaurizio Mazzoleni
Maurizio Mazzoleni
GBGiuliano Di Baldassarre
Giuliano Di Baldassarre
Risk management has reduced vulnerability to floods and droughts globally1,2, yet their impacts are still increasing3. An improved understanding of the causes of changing impacts is therefore needed, but has been hampered by a lack of empirical data4,5. On the basis of a global dataset of 45 pairs of events that occurred within the same area, we show that risk management generally reduces the impacts of floods and droughts but faces difficulties in reducing the impacts of unprecedented events of a magnitude not previously experienced. If the second event was much more hazardous than the first, its impact was almost always higher. This is because management was not designed to deal with such extreme events: for example, they exceeded the design levels of levees and reservoirs. In two success stories, the impact of the second, more hazardous, event was lower, as a result of improved risk management governance and high investment in integrated management. The observed difficulty of managing unprecedented events is alarming, given that more extreme hydrological events are projected owing to climate change3.

16 August 2019 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGiuliano Di Baldassarre
Giuliano Di Baldassarre
MSMurugesu Sivapalan
Murugesu Sivapalan
MRMaria Rusca
Maria Rusca
Christophe CudennecChristophe Cudennec
Christophe Cudennec
MGMargaret Garcia
Margaret Garcia
Günter BlöschlGünter Blöschl
Günter Blöschl
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations Agenda 2030 represent an ambitious blueprint to reduce inequalities globally and achieve a sustainable future for all mankind. Meeting the SDGs for water requires an integrated approach to managing and allocating water resources, by involving all actors and stakeholders, and considering how water resources link different sectors of society. To date, water management practice is dominated by technocratic, scenario‐based approaches that may work well in the short term but can result in unintended consequences in the long term due to limited accounting of dynamic feedbacks between the natural, technical, and social dimensions of human‐water systems. The discipline of sociohydrology has an important role to play in informing policy by developing a generalizable understanding of phenomena that arise from interactions between water and human systems. To explain these phenomena, sociohydrology must address several scientific challenges to strengthen the field and broaden its scope. These include engagement with social scientists to accommodate social heterogeneity, power relations, trust, cultural beliefs, and cognitive biases, which strongly influence the way in which people alter, and adapt to, changing hydrological regimes. It also requires development of new methods to formulate and test alternative hypotheses for the explanation of emergent phenomena generated by feedbacks between water and society. Advancing sociohydrology in these ways therefore represents a major contribution toward meeting the targets set by the SDGs, the societal grand challenge of our time.

15 August 2022 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XLXueying Li
Xueying Li
DLDi Long
Di Long
BSBridget R. Scanlon
Bridget R. Scanlon
MMMichael E. Mann
Michael E. Mann
XLXingdong Li
Xingdong Li
GWGuangqian Wang
Guangqian Wang

14 January 2017 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RXRan Xu
Ran Xu
FTFuqiang Tian
Fuqiang Tian
LYLong Yang
Long Yang
HHHongchang Hu
Hongchang Hu
Hui LuHui Lu
Hui Lu
AHAizhong Hou
Aizhong Hou
The objective of this study is to evaluate two satellite rainfall products Global Precipitation Measurement Integrated MultisatellitE Retrievals and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 3B42V7 (GPM IMERG and TRMM 3B42V7) in southern Tibetan Plateau region, with special focus on the dependence of products' performance on topography and rainfall intensity. Over 500 in situ rain gauges constitute an unprecedentedly dense rain gauge network over this region and provide an exceptional resource for ground validation of satellite rainfall estimates. Our evaluation centers on the rainy season from May to October in 2014. Results indicate that (1) GPM product outperforms TRMM at all spatial scales and elevation ranges in detecting daily rainfall accumulation; (2) rainfall accumulation over the entire rainy season is negatively correlated with mean elevation for rain gauges and the two satellite rainfall products, while the performance of TRMM also significantly correlates with topographic variations; (3) in terms of the ability of rainfall detection, false alarming ratio of TRMM (21%) is larger than that of GPM (14%), while missing ratio of GPM (13%) is larger than that of TRMM (9%). GPM tends to underestimate the amount of light rain events of 0–1 mm/d, while the opposite (overestimation) is true for TRMM. GPM shows better detecting ability for light rainfall (0–5 mm/d) events but there is no detection skill for both GPM and TRMM at high‐elevation (>4500 m) regions. Our results not only highlight the superiority of GPM to TRMM in southern Tibetan Plateau region but also recommend that further improvement on the rainfall retrieval algorithm is needed by considering topographical influences for both GPM and TRMM rainfall products.

1 March 2023 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTong Cui
Tong Cui
YLYukun Li
Yukun Li
LYLong Yang
Long Yang
YNYi Nan
Yi Nan
KLKunbiao Li
Kunbiao Li
FTFuqiang Tian
Fuqiang Tian
Previous projections show consistent increases in river flows of Asian Water Towers under future climate change. Here we find non-monotonic changes in river flows for seven major rivers originating from the Tibetan Plateau at the warming levels of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 3.0 °C based on an observation-constrained hydrological model. The annual mean streamflow for seven rivers at 1.5 °C warming level decreases by 0.1–3.2% relative to the present-day climate condition, and increases by 1.5–12% at 3.0 °C warming level. The shifting river flows for the Yellow, Yangtze, Brahmaputra, and Ganges are mostly influenced by projected increases in rainfall, but those for the Mekong, Salween, and Indus are dictated by the relative changes in rainfall, snowmelt and glacier melt. Reduced river flows in a moderately warmed climate threaten water security in riparian countries, while elevated flood risks are expected with further temperature increases over the Tibetan Plateau.

9 July 2021 in Earth and Space Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTong Cui
Tong Cui
CLChao Li
Chao Li
FTFuqiang Tian
Fuqiang Tian
This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of the mean and extreme surface air temperature and precipitation in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) multimodel ensemble simulations over the Tibetan Plateau. Simulations from 29 climate models are compared against gridded observations for the period 1961–2012. Results show that models reasonably reproduce the overall spatial patterns of the 1961–2012 averages of seasonal mean temperature and precipitation. Nevertheless, models tend to underestimate mean temperature and overestimate precipitation accumulations. To be specific, the multimodel mean estimates of seasonal average temperatures over the plateau are 0.5°C–2.6°C colder than observed, while the corresponding estimates of seasonal precipitation accumulations are 218% (spring: March–May), 76% (summer: June–August), 129% (autumn: September–November), and 533% (winter: December–February) of those observed. As in observations, models also well capture increasing trend of mean temperature and precipitation in all seasons but underestimate the rates of increasing trends for both variables in all seasons. Models’ ability to simulate temperature and precipitation extremes is also evaluated in terms of a set of chosen extreme indices defined by the Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices. On average, models tend to underestimate the averages of annual maximum daily maximum temperature, annual minimum daily minimum temperature, frost days, warm nights, and consecutive dry days but overestimate the corresponding averages of annual maximum 5‐day precipitation accumulations and simply daily intensity. Generally, models are able to simulate the signs of the trends in extreme indices but underestimate their magnitudes and misrepresent spatial patterns.