Grain drying technology is a core process for ensuring food quality, extending storage life, and improving processing adaptability. With the continuous growth of global food demand and the increasing requirements for food quality and energy efficiency, traditional drying technologies face multiple challenges. This paper reviews six major grain drying technologies, comprising hot air drying, microwave drying, infrared drying, freeze drying, vacuum drying, and solar drying. It provides an in-depth discussion of the working principles, advantages, and limitations of each technology, and analyzes their performance in practical applications. In response to challenges such as high energy consumption, uneven drying, and quality loss during the drying process, the paper also explores the research progress of several hybrid drying systems, such as microwave–hot air drying combined systems and solar–infrared drying systems. Although these emerging technologies show significant potential in improving drying efficiency, energy saving, and maintaining food quality, their high costs, scalability, and process stability still limit large-scale applications. Therefore, future research should focus on reducing energy consumption, improving drying precision, and optimizing drying system integration, particularly by introducing intelligent control systems. This would maximize the preservation of food quality while improving the system’s economic efficiency and sustainability, promoting innovation in food production and processing technologies, and further advancing global food security and sustainable agricultural development.

Elevated [CO₂] enhances light interception and carboxylation efficiency in plants. The combined effects of [CO₂] and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) on stomatal morphology, leaf anatomy, and photosynthetic capacity in tomato seedlings remain unclear. This study subjected tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum Mill. cv. Jingpeng No.1) to two [CO₂] (ambient [a[CO₂], 400 µmol·mol⁻¹] and enriched [e[CO₂], 800 µmol·mol⁻¹]) and three PPFD levels (L; low[Ll: 200 µmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹], moderate[Lm: 300 µmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹], and high[Lh: 400 µmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹]) to assess their interactive impacts. Results showed that e[CO₂] and increased PPFD synergistically improved relative growth rate and net assimilation rate while reducing specific leaf area and leaf area ratio. Notably, e[CO₂] decreased stomatal aperture (−13.81%) and density (−27.76%), whereas elevated PPFD promoted stomatal morphological adjustments. Additionally, Leaf thickness increased by 72.98% under e[CO₂], with Lm and Lh enhancing this by 10.79% and 41.50% compared to Ll. Furthermore, photosynthetic performance under e[CO₂] was further evidenced by improved chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (excluding non-photochemical quenching). While both e[CO₂] and increased PPFD Photosynthetic performance under e[CO₂] was further evidenced by improved chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (excluding non-photochemical quenching). Moreover, e[CO₂]-Lh treatment maximized total dry mass and seedling health index. Correlation analysis indicated that synergistic optimization of stomatal traits and leaf structure under a combination of e[CO₂] and increased PPFD enhanced light harvesting and CO₂ diffusion, thereby promoting carbon assimilation. These findings highlight e[CO₂]-Lh as an optimal strategy for tomato seedling growth, providing empirical guidance for precision CO₂ fertilization and light management in controlled cultivation.