Cancer treatment has undergone a paradigm shift following the introduction of novel cancer treatment approaches that involve the host’s immune system in fighting established tumors. This new concept aids the immune system in identifying, attacking, and killing the tumor cells. However, although some encouraging results were observed clinically, this approach has its own limitations. For example, the benefits of certain anticancer drugs were only observed in some patients, off-target effects, immune evasion, and poor pharmacokinetics. Recently, several advancements have been made with the understanding and development of tumor-targeted drug delivery systems, which combine both effectiveness and patients’ safety during cancer treatment. In this review, we will focus on the latest progress in targeted drug delivery, particularly applying nanoparticles, liposomes, exosomes, and Wharton’s jelly-derived macrovesicles as immune cell enhancers, as well as overcoming therapeutic resistance. We also characterize major current problems, such as the biocompatibility and scalability of the delivered engineering systems, as well as the required regulations. Lastly, we will show some examples of effective approaches to resolve these issues for more efficient cancer therapy. The importance of this article lies in bridging two sides in a single framework perspective: the novel implementation of unique delivery systems and the latest advances in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Thus, this provides better insights for the future of cancer treatment.

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly advancing class of targeted cancer therapeutics that couple the antigen specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with the potent cytotoxicity of small-molecule drugs. In their core design, a tumor-targeting antibody is covalently linked to a cytotoxic payload via a chemical linker, enabling the selective delivery of highly potent agents to malignant cells while sparing normal tissues, thereby improving the therapeutic index. Humanized and fully human immunoglobulin G1(IgG1) antibodies are the most common ADC backbones due to their stability in systemic circulation, robust Fcγ receptor engagement for immune effector functions, and reduced immunogenicity. Antibody selection requires balancing tumor specificity, internalization rate, and binding affinity to avoid barriers to tissue penetration, such as the binding-site barrier effect, while emerging designs exploit tumor-specific antigen variants or unique post-translational modifications to further enhance selectivity. Advances in antibody engineering, linker chemistry, and payload innovation have reinforced the clinical success of ADCs, with more than a dozen agents FDA approved for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors and over 200 in active clinical trials. This review critically examines established and emerging conjugation strategies, including lysine- and cysteine-based chemistries, enzymatic tagging, glycan remodeling, non-canonical amino acid incorporation, and affinity peptide-mediated methods, and discusses how conjugation site, drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) control, and linker stability influence pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety. Innovations in site-specific conjugation have improved ADC homogeneity, stability, and clinical predictability, though challenges in large-scale manufacturing and regulatory harmonization remain. Furthermore, novel ADC architectures such as bispecific ADCs, conditionally active (probody) ADCs, immune-stimulating ADCs, protein-degrader ADCs, and dual-payload designs are being developed to address tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, and off-target toxicity. By integrating mechanistic insights, preclinical and clinical data, and recent technological advances, this work highlights current progress and future directions for next-generation ADCs aimed at achieving superior efficacy, safety, and patient outcomes, especially in treating refractory cancers.

The non-invasive brain sensing modulation technology field is experiencing rapid development, with new techniques constantly emerging. This study delves into the field of non-invasive brain neuromodulation, a safer and potentially effective approach for treating a spectrum of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Unlike traditional deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, non-invasive techniques employ ultrasound, electrical currents, and electromagnetic field stimulation to stimulate the brain from outside the skull, thereby eliminating surgery risks and enhancing patient comfort. This study explores the mechanisms of various modalities, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), highlighting their potential to address chronic pain, anxiety, Parkinson’s disease, and depression. We also probe into the concept of closed-loop neuromodulation, which personalizes stimulation based on real-time brain activity. While we acknowledge the limitations of current technologies, our study concludes by proposing future research avenues to advance this rapidly evolving field with its immense potential to revolutionize neurological and psychiatric care and lay the foundation for the continuing advancement of innovative non-invasive brain sensing technologies.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common and debilitating complication of diabetes mellitus which affects individuals with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), presenting with sensory loss, pain, and progressive nerve dysfunction. DPN pathogenesis is multifactorial: chronic hyperglycemia activates the polyol, hexosamine, and protein kinase C (PKC) pathways, increases advanced glycation end-products, and drives oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and impaired neurotrophic signaling. In addition to hyperglycemia-driven mechanisms, dyslipidemia and microvascular insufficiency exacerbate neural ischemia and metabolic stress. Recent mechanistic, animal, and associative human studies further implicate amyloidogenic toxicity, particularly from human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP), as a plausible contributory factor in peripheral nerve degeneration in T2DM, linking protein misfolding and aggregation to axonal damage and demyelination in DPN. Despite increased understanding of these mechanisms, current treatments remain mainly symptomatic. Emerging therapeutic strategies, including antioxidants, anti-inflammatory agents, modulators of mitochondrial function, amyloid oligomer modulators, neurotrophic enhancers, and regenerative approaches such as stem cells and gene-based therapies, offer potential to modify disease progression. The strength of evidence across these methods varies, ranging from mechanistic and animal studies to early human research and, in some cases, randomized clinical trials. Therefore, although several candidates show potential to alter the disease, few have demonstrated consistent benefits on objective measures of nerve structure or function in large clinical trials. This review summarizes the key mechanisms driving DPN in T2DM and highlights promising therapeutic innovations poised for clinical translation.

Conventional immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, has revolutionized cancer therapy over the past decade. Yet, the efficacy of these therapies is limited by tumor resistance, antigen escape mechanisms, poor persistence, and T-cell exhaustion, particularly in the treatment of solid tumors. The emergence of unconventional immunotherapies offers novel opportunities by leveraging diverse immune cell subsets and synthetic biologics. This review explores various immunotherapy platforms, including gamma delta T cells, invariant natural killer T cells, mucosal-associated invariant T cells, engineered regulatory T cells, and universal CAR platforms. Additionally, it expands on biologics, including bispecific and multispecific antibodies, cytokine fusions, agonists, and oncolytic viruses, showcasing their potential for modular engineering and off-the-shelf applicability. Distinct features of unconventional platforms include independence from the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), tissue-homing capabilities, stress ligand sensing, and the ability to bridge adaptive and innate immunity. Their compatibility with engineering approaches highlights their potential as scalable, efficient, and cost-effective therapies. To overcome translational challenges such as functional heterogeneity, immune exhaustion, tumor microenvironment-mediated suppression, and limited persistence, novel strategies will be discussed, including metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming, immune cloaking, gene editing, and the utilization of artificial intelligence for patient stratification. Ultimately, unconventional immunotherapies extend the therapeutic horizon of cancer immunotherapy by breaking barriers in solid tumor treatment and increasing accessibility. Continued investments in research for mechanistic insights and scalable manufacturing are key to unlocking their full clinical potential.

Liposomal drug delivery systems have evolved into clinically relevant platforms for delivering small molecules, biologics, and vaccines. Nevertheless, a persistent translational gap remains between promising laboratory-scale formulations and reproducible pharmaceutical products. This review provides a practical framework linking liposome formulation, physicochemical characterization, manufacturing, and stability to pharmaceutical translation. Particular emphasis is placed on relationships between critical process parameters and critical quality attributes, including vesicle size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, morphology, lamellarity, encapsulation efficiency, drug loading, and in vitro release behavior. Preparation and cargo-loading strategies are discussed across conventional research-scale methods and approaches with potential for scalable manufacturing. Microfluidic production of conventional liposomes is distinguished from the manufacture of structurally distinct RNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles. Purification strategies and analytical determination of encapsulation efficiency are examined, with attention to the distinction between separation techniques and quantitative analytical methods. Lamellarity is highlighted as a structural determinant of encapsulation capacity, membrane organization, and release behavior, with complementary assessment by cryo-TEM, ³¹P-NMR, and small-angle X-ray scattering. Quality-control challenges associated with aggregation, fusion, cargo leakage, phospholipid hydrolysis, oxidation, and sterilization are also considered. Dry-state stabilization through lyophilization and spray drying is discussed for its potential to improve long-term stability and reduce cold-chain dependence. Ligand-targeted liposomes introduce additional requirements for surface characterization and biological evaluation, while approved products and investigational formulations illustrate achievements and limitations in clinical translation. Overall, this review emphasizes the importance of establishing relationships between formulation composition, processing, structural organization, stability, and functional performance to support more reproducible development and informed pharmaceutical translation.