This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.

Unclaimed
Mandy Hinzmann
Ecologic Institute, Germany

Basic Info

Basic Info is private.

Honors and Awards

The user has no records in this section


Career Timeline

The user has no records in this section.


Short Biography

The user biography is not available.
Following
Followers
Co Authors
The list of users this user is following is empty.
Following: 0 users

Feed

Original research article
Published: 16 April 2021 in Frontiers in Agronomy
Reads 0
Downloads 0

The subsoil, commonly defined as horizons below the working depth of 30 cm, often receives little attention in farming practice. Yet plants extract between 10 and 80% of their nutrient and water requirements from the subsoil. Recent research indicates that subsoil amelioration measures, which enhance water storage capacity, root penetration and microbial activity, could contribute to stabilizing yields in times of drought. Therefore, we investigated farmers' and other soil experts' perceptions of subsoil amelioration as an approach to adapt to climate change as well as the factors that influence their willingness to adopt specific measures to improve the subsoil. We applied the Q-method combined with focus groups in two case study regions in Germany. Two subsoil amelioration techniques were considered: (1) Deep loosening combined with the incorporation of compost into deep soil layers (30–60 cm) and (2) the cultivation of alfalfa as deep-rooting pre-crop. Our results show three distinct views on subsoil amelioration, which we termed as the “pioneers,” the “skeptics,” and the “ecologists.” While the pioneers were open toward applying deep loosening combined with incorporation of compost into the subsoil, the skeptics had concerns about the method and perceived it as hardly feasible in practice, and the ecologists clearly preferred biological approaches such as alfalfa cultivation. Despite the different views, all three perspectives view subsoil amelioration as a useful approach to adapt to changing climate conditions. In conclusion, we identified a number of factors that influence the willingness to implement specific techniques to improve the subsoil: economic and farm-level considerations, awareness of subsoil functions, environmental awareness, individual norms and beliefs as well as risk perception. We recommend considering these factors in the design of a policy framework that promotes subsoil amelioration in Germany. Our findings could be of relevance for agricultural systems around the world, which are prone to drought risk.

ACS Style

Mandy Hinzmann; Sophie Ittner; Zoritza Kiresiewa; Holger Gerdes. An Acceptance Analysis of Subsoil Amelioration Amongst Agricultural Actors in Two Regions in Germany. Frontiers in Agronomy 2021, 3, 1 .

AMA Style

Mandy Hinzmann, Sophie Ittner, Zoritza Kiresiewa, Holger Gerdes. An Acceptance Analysis of Subsoil Amelioration Amongst Agricultural Actors in Two Regions in Germany. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2021; 3 ():1.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mandy Hinzmann; Sophie Ittner; Zoritza Kiresiewa; Holger Gerdes. 2021. "An Acceptance Analysis of Subsoil Amelioration Amongst Agricultural Actors in Two Regions in Germany." Frontiers in Agronomy 3, no. : 1.

Journal article
Published: 24 August 2018 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Subsoil, commonly defined as horizons below the working depth of 30 cm, has traditionally received little explicit attention in policy discussions on soils. Recently, however, there has been growing recognition among scientists of the issues of subsoil (re-)compaction and of the role of subsoil as a resource that can offer valuable nutrients and water for plants. Subsoil management could provide an option to sustainably maintain yields in the context of climate change and resource scarcity, and it is a central question in addressing subsoil compaction. Yet how socially acceptable are different methods for subsoil management? Drawing on in-depth interviews with farmers and stakeholders in Germany, we show that biophysical conditions, the timing of operations, economic considerations, and awareness of subsoil functions are key factors in the acceptance of management methods. Views towards methods involving mechanical intervention are more diverse and in some cases more critical because the benefits are not always certain, the costs can outweigh the benefits, and/or because they entail risks for soil structure and functions. Alfalfa cultivation is seen to be beneficial for yields without risks for soil structure and functions; however, economic barriers limit its uptake. Awareness of multiple subsoil functions is associated with more critical views of mechanical interventions.

ACS Style

Ana Frelih-Larsen; Mandy Hinzmann; Sophie Ittner. The ‘Invisible’ Subsoil: An Exploratory View of Societal Acceptance of Subsoil Management in Germany. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3006 .

AMA Style

Ana Frelih-Larsen, Mandy Hinzmann, Sophie Ittner. The ‘Invisible’ Subsoil: An Exploratory View of Societal Acceptance of Subsoil Management in Germany. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (9):3006.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ana Frelih-Larsen; Mandy Hinzmann; Sophie Ittner. 2018. "The ‘Invisible’ Subsoil: An Exploratory View of Societal Acceptance of Subsoil Management in Germany." Sustainability 10, no. 9: 3006.