Vilém Pechanec

Prof. Dr. Vilém Pechanec

Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Olomoucký Kraj, Czech Republic
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 March 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Petr SmykalPetr Smykal
Petr Smykal
OTOldřich Trněný
Oldřich Trněný
JBJan Brus
Jan Brus
PHPavel Hanáček
Pavel Hanáček
ARAbhishek Rathore
Abhishek Rathore
Cengiz TokerCengiz Toker
Cengiz Toker
Knowledge of current genetic diversity and mating systems of crop wild relatives (CWR) in the Fertile Crescent is important in crop genetic improvement, because western agriculture began in the area after the cold-dry period known as Younger Dryas about 12,000 years ago and these species are also wild genepools of the world’s most important food crops. Wild pea (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius) is an important source of genetic diversity for further pea crop improvement harbouring traits useful in climate change context. The genetic structure was assessed on 187 individuals of Pisum sativum subsp. elatius from fourteen populations collected in the northern part of the Fertile Crescent using 18,397 genome wide single nucleotide polymorphism DARTseq markers. AMOVA showed that 63% of the allelic variation was distributed between populations and 19% between individuals within populations. Four populations were found to contain admixed individuals. The observed heterozygosity ranged between 0.99 to 6.26% with estimated self-pollination rate between 47 to 90%. Genetic distances of wild pea populations were correlated with geographic but not environmental (climatic) distances and support a mixed mating system with predominant self-pollination. Niche modelling with future climatic projections showed a local decline in habitats suitable for wild pea, making a strong case for further collection and ex situ conservation.

1 September 2018 in Ecological Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vilém PechanecVilém Pechanec
Vilém Pechanec
JPJan Purkyt
Jan Purkyt
ABAntonín Benc
Antonín Benc
Chukwudi NwaoguChukwudi Nwaogu
Chukwudi Nwaogu
LŠLenka Štěrbová
Lenka Štěrbová
Pavel CudlinPavel Cudlin
Pavel Cudlin

14 January 2019 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IHIveta Hradilová
Iveta Hradilová
MDMartin Duchoslav
Martin Duchoslav
JBJan Brus
Jan Brus
Vilém PechanecVilém Pechanec
Vilém Pechanec
MHMiroslav Hýbl
Miroslav Hýbl
Petr SmykalPetr Smykal
Petr Smykal
Background: Seed germination is one of the earliest key events in the plant life cycle. The timing of transition from seed to seedling is an important developmental stage determining the survival of individuals that influences the status of populations and species. Because of wide geographical distribution and occurrence in diverse habitats, wild pea (Pisum sativumsubsp.elatius) offers an excellent model to study physical type of seed dormancy in an ecological context. This study addresses the gap in knowledge of association between the seed dormancy, seed properties and environmental factors, experimentally testing oscillating temperature as dormancy release clue.Methods: Seeds of 97 pea accessions were subjected to two germination treatments (oscillating temperatures of 25/15 °C and 35/15 °C) over 28 days. Germination pattern was described using B-spline coefficients that aggregate both final germination and germination speed. Relationships between germination pattern and environmental conditions at the site of origin (soil and bioclimatic variables extracted from WorldClim 2.0 and SoilGrids databases) were studied using principal component analysis, redundancy analysis and ecological niche modelling. Seeds were analyzed for the seed coat thickness, seed morphology, weight and content of proanthocyanidins (PA).Results: Seed total germination ranged from 0% to 100%. Cluster analysis of germination patterns of seeds under two temperature treatments differentiated the accessions into three groups: (1) non-dormant (28 accessions, mean germination of 92%), (2) dormant at both treatments (29 acc., 15%) and (3) responsive to increasing temperature range (41 acc., with germination change from 15 to 80%). Seed coat thickness differed between groups with dormant and responsive accessions having thicker testa (median 138 and 140 µm) than non-dormant ones (median 84 mm). The total PA content showed to be higher in the seed coat of dormant (mean 2.18 mg g−1) than those of non-dormant (mean 1.77 mg g−1) and responsive accessions (mean 1.87 mg g−1). Each soil and bioclimatic variable and also germination responsivity (representing synthetic variable characterizing germination pattern of seeds) was spatially clustered. However, only one environmental variable (BIO7, i.e., annual temperature range) was significantly related to germination responsivity. Non-dormant and responsive accessions covered almost whole range of BIO7 while dormant accessions are found in the environment with higher annual temperature, smaller temperature variation, seasonality and milder winter. Ecological niche modelling showed a more localized potential distribution of dormant group. Seed dormancy in the wild pea might be part of a bet-hedging mechanism for areas of the Mediterranean basin with more unpredictable water availability in an otherwise seasonal environment. This study provides the framework for analysis of environmental aspects of physical seed dormancy.

4 January 2018 in Nature Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vilém PechanecVilém Pechanec
Vilém Pechanec
IMIvo Machar
Ivo Machar
TPTomáš Pohanka
Tomáš Pohanka
ZOZdeněk Opršal
Zdeněk Opršal
FPFrantišek Petrovič
František Petrovič
JMJitka Málková
Jitka Málková
In conservation biology, there is a general consensus that protected areas (PAs) are one of the most effective tools for biodiversity protection. Worldwide, the area of PAs is continually increasing. But is the effectiveness of biodiversity protection improving with it? Since many PAs only exist as “paper parks” (i.e. they exist on maps and in legislation but offer little actual protection), the answer is uncertain. Moreover, it has long been known that, not only an increase in the extent of PAs, but also the efficiency of their management is fundamentally important for effective nature conservation. Therefore, there is a wide-ranging discussion about the actual effectiveness of PAs and factors that influence it. In the course of the EU pre-accession phase, a comprehensive field mapping of natural habitats took place in the Czech Republic in years 2001−2004. The mapping results were used to designate Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) as part of the Natura 2000 network. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of this newly created system of SACs for protection of biodiversity represented by the mapped natural habitats. The NCEI index (Nature Conservation Effectiveness Index) was applied, calculated as the total area of a particular habitat type in all SACs in the Czech Republic divided by the total area of that same natural habitat in the entire Czech Republic. Habitat protection in the Czech Republic is focused primarily on the smallest types of rare habitats, many of which are classified as critically endangered. The Czech national system of SACs provides protection to a total of 4,491.68 km2 of natural habitats. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the overall effectiveness of the SAC system in the Czech Republic, which is specifically aimed at protecting natural habitats, is low (NCEI = 0.36). Nevertheless, the critically endangered habitats receive maximum protection (NCEI = 1).

4 June 2020 in Journal of Mountain Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nabin DhunganaNabin Dhungana
Nabin Dhungana
NSNisha Silwal
Nisha Silwal
Suraj UpadhayaSuraj Upadhaya
Suraj Upadhaya
CKChiranjeewee Khadka
Chiranjeewee Khadka
SRSunil Kumar Regmi
Sunil Kumar Regmi
SASamjhana Adhikari
Samjhana Adhikari

1 March 2017 in Moravian Geographical Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHelena Kilianová
Helena Kilianová
Vilém PechanecVilém Pechanec
Vilém Pechanec
JBJan Brus
Jan Brus
KKKarel Kirchner
Karel Kirchner
IMIvo Machar
Ivo Machar
The results of an analysis of land use development in the Morava River floodplain (Czech Republic) using GIS from 1836 to the present, are the subject of this article. The results are based on the analysis of historical maps, using the landscape matrix assessment of the Morava River floodplain. The final analyses were processed from land use maps of the floodplain at a scale of 1 : 25,000 in five time horizons. These maps were compared with the present state of landscape by GIS methods. The study area was assessed according to five geomorphological areas from the northern/higher part to the southern/lower part of floodplain. In 1836 the landscape matrix of the floodplain was composed of meadows and forests. Forest components decreased minimally but the changes are more important. The grassland area (meadows and pastures) decreased but arable land, as well as settlements, increased very significantly. In the 1950s the landscape matrix was composed of a mosaic of alluvial forests, meadows and arable land. Currently, the predominant landscape matrix consists of arable land and isolated forest complexes.