Mark Marsalis

Dr. Mark Marsalis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 April 2021 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VTVesh Thapa
Vesh Thapa
Rajan GhimireRajan Ghimire
Rajan Ghimire
MMMark Marsalis
Mark Marsalis
Cover crops can improve soil health by maintaining soil organic carbon (SOC) and nitrogen (N) contents, yet their dynamics in relation to crop yield in a semi-arid cropping system are poorly understood. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the response of diverse winter cover crop species and their mixture on SOC and N fractions and their relationship with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) yield in a winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–sorghum–fallow rotation with limited irrigation management. Cover cropping treatments included pea (Pisum sativum L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), and mixtures of pea+oat (POM), pea+canola (PCM), peat+oat+canola (POCM), and a six-species mixture (SSM) of pea+oat+canola+hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth)+forage radish (Raphanussativus L.)+barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as cover crops and a fallow. Soil samples were analyzed for residual inorganic N, potentially mineralizable carbon (PMC) and nitrogen (PMN), SOC, and total N. Response of labile inorganic N, PMC, and PMN varied with cover crop treatments. The SOC and total N contents did not differ among treatments but were 20% and 35% higher in 2020 than in 2019, respectively. Sorghum grain yield was 25% and 40% greater with oats than with PCM and canola cover crops in 2019, while it was 33–97% greater with fallow and oats than other treatments in 2020. Oat as a cover crop could improve the resilience of limited-irrigation cropping systems by increasing SOC, soil N, and crop yield in semi-arid regions.

1 January 2009 in Forage & Grazinglands
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FCFrancisco E. Contreras‐Govea
Francisco E. Contreras‐Govea
LLLeonard Lauriault
Leonard Lauriault
MMMark Marsalis
Mark Marsalis
Sangu AngadiSangu Angadi
Sangu Angadi
NPNaveen Puppala
Naveen Puppala

19 December 2022 in Pedobiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MOMohammed Omer
Mohammed Omer
OIOmololu John Idowu
Omololu John Idowu
NPNicole Pietrasiak
Nicole Pietrasiak
DVDawn VanLeeuwen
Dawn VanLeeuwen
AUApril State Ulery
April State Ulery
MMMark Marsalis
Mark Marsalis

4 November 2008 in Forage & Grazinglands
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMark Marsalis
Mark Marsalis
LLLeonard M. Lauriault
Leonard M. Lauriault
DVDawn M. VanLeeuwen
Dawn M. VanLeeuwen

1 January 2013 in Forage & Grazinglands
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FCFrancisco E. Contreras‐Govea
Francisco E. Contreras‐Govea
DVDawn M. VanLeeuwen
Dawn M. VanLeeuwen
SASangu V. Angadi
Sangu V. Angadi
MMMark Marsalis
Mark Marsalis

4 November 2020 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LBLeslie Beck
Leslie Beck
MMMark Marsalis
Mark Marsalis
LLLeonard Lauriault
Leonard Lauriault
MSMatteo Serena
Matteo Serena
Broadleaf (Plantago major L.) and buckhorn plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) are perennial weeds that are notoriously difficult to control in alfalfa cropping systems. Sharpen® (saflufenacil) herbicide has been registered for broadleaf weed control in dormant alfalfa, although it has not been evaluated on plantain control. Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the efficacy of saflufenacil on plantain control with assessments of damage to alfalfa and effects on yield. In the greenhouse, applications of saflufenacil alone caused greater injury to both broadleaf and buckhorn plantain compared to the non-treated control (NTC). Additionally, applications of saflufenacil in combination with other herbicides (imazethapyr or imazamox) caused the greatest amount of injury to both broadleaf and buckhorn plantain compared to all other commercially available herbicide treatments. However, this injury was not enough to effectively control the weeds and prevent recovery and regrowth over time. In the field, alfalfa did not exhibit damage symptoms, or have reduced yield when treated with saflufenacil compared to the NTC. This research indicates that applications of saflufenacil provided temporary injury throughout the duration of the study to both broadleaf and buckhorn plantain with few negative effects to alfalfa in the field.