The promotion of regular physical activity (PA) is becoming one of the main tools applied in developed countries to address health and obesity problems, particularly in view of the proven benefits of PA on a physical, psychological, and social level. Indeed, childhood and adolescence are crucial periods for an active lifestyle can be established, with the prospect of prolonging it in adulthood. The conceptual model propounded by Stodden provides a theoretical underpinning for the relationship between motor competence (MC) and PA. This study’s objective was to explore the predictive value of motor competence (MC) regarding physical activity (PA), along with the mediating role played by self-perceived motor competence (SPMC) and comparatively perceived motor competence (CPMC), with the purpose of confirming the theoretical model propounded by Stodden, as well as the relationships among variables in our own conceptual model. To this end, we tested a random sample of 925 adolescents (53.6% males; 46.3% females, age 13.75 years, SD = 1.28). Participants completed the Multidimensional Sportcomp Battery to evaluate MC and the Achievement Motivation in Physical Education test (AMPET4) to evaluate their perception of their competence; moreover, to evaluate PA, we used three indicators from the WHO Health Behaviour in Schoolchildren survey in the Spanish version. Our final theoretical model explains 19.9% of the variance of sport practice in boys and 24.2% in girls; moreover, it ascribes an important role to self-perceived motor competence (SPMC) and to comparatively perceived motor competence (CPMC) as mediating variables in the relationship between MC and PA in both sexes. Notably, we found a direct relationship between motor coordination/control tests and PA. Overall, this study underscores the degree to which adolescents’ perceived motor competence affects their actual motor competence.

University students use the Internet regularly for study, socialising, and entertainment; moreover, in adolescents and young adults, Internet use increases with age. More than ever before, the wide availability of online information requires critical thinking coupled with skills for evaluating online information, such as verifying the reliability of information and netiquette. These competencies might influence deep learning; however, few studies have analysed all these variables together. In addition, there is an ongoing academic debate as to whether using smartphones at an early age is beneficial for learning. Our study aimed to analyse, according to the age of the first smartphone, to what extent students’ critical thinking disposition, netiquette, and evaluation of the reliability of online information predict their capacity for deep learning. Our sample comprised 415 Spanish university students aged 18–36 (M = 19.98 and SD = 4.18). The instruments used were, for the assessment of Deep Learning, the Subscale of the questionnaire Attitudes towards learning of university students CEVAPU (to measure the Critical Thinking Disposition, we used the CTDS scale (Spanish adaptation of Bravo et al., 2020 and also the Competence Scale Evaluation of the reliability of online information (e-CEI) (Denoni & Cebollero-Salinas, 2025; and, finally, to assess Netiquette, the subscale of the questionnaire Evaluation of the quality of cyberbehavior “EsCaCiber” Multiple linear regression results indicated that in those participants who indicated they had acquired a smartphone before the age of thirteen, the two competencies of netiquette and evaluation of online information reliability were more strongly predictive of deep learning than in the group of participants who had their first smartphone when they were thirteen or older. Our study confirms that critical thinking disposition is a factor that favours deep learning in both groups (i.e., smartphone acquisition before and after 13 years old). The social and educational implications are along the lines of fostering a disposition to critical thinking, educating in digital literacy, especially in verifying the reliability of information, and communicating with netiquette for deep learning. Our findings indicate a potential association between critical thinking disposition and a greater propensity for deep learning in both groups (i.e., smartphone acquisition before and after 13 years old). A relevant educational implication of the results seems to indicate that a possible way to achieve deep university learning is to encourage critical thinking, to educate in digital literacy, especially in the verification of the reliability of information and to communicate with netiquette. Some of the limitations of the research design are the use of self-reports, convenience sampling and a cross-sectional design.

The demands of modern society regarding academic training have placed the focus of education on active methodologies. Their proven success also presents challenges for the innovation they entail. In this regard, methodological strategies such as gamification are currently focusing their analyses on design to ensure the effectiveness of their outcomes. With this in mind, we aim to analyse a gamification experience in higher education from the perspective of the various stakeholders involved. Using a qualitative methodology, data from an open-ended survey and the learning journals of 73 students were triangulated with the teaching journals of four lecturers. The category-based data analysis indicates that escape room-type games and digital boards are the most highly valued as innovative educational tools that promote active learning. Conflict resolution, cooperative work, and understanding of theoretical knowledge stood out as achieved objectives. The overall positive view, the classroom atmosphere of excitement and fun, and the impact on learning due to increased motivation were highlighted in participants’ opinions. From the lecturers’ perspective, the outcome is shown to be worthwhile in terms of effort and benefit.

Una de las competencias clave para desenvolverse en un mundo cada vez más complejo es el pensamiento crítico. La irrupción de internet y de la inteligencia artificial ha potenciado aún más la necesidad de desarrollar la disposición al pensamiento crítico, especialmente entre los jóvenes. Los chicos y las chicas en la universidad estudian, se comunican y se divierten utilizando internet, aunque lo hacen de manera diferenciada. En este sentido, sería interesante conocer en qué medida evaluar la información en internet puede facilitar el desarrollo de una disposición al pensamiento crítico más estable. Dada la ausencia de estudios que lo valoren, el objetivo de esta investigación es analizar si conductas como evaluar la fiabilidad de la información en línea y la netiqueta, ambas requieren valoración de la información en internet, predicen la disposición al pensamiento crítico y además, de forma diferenciada según el sexo. Participaron 415 estudiantes de Magisterio con edades entre 17 y 36 años. A través de regresiones lineales múltiples, los resultados muestran que la evaluar la veracidad de la información en línea, especialmente en los chicos, y la netiqueta, especialmente en las chicas, predicen la disposición al pensamiento crítico. Se analizan las implicaciones educativas, especialmente en futuros docentes.