3D printing, is a newly adopted technique in the construction sector with the aim to improve the economics and alleviate environmental impacts. This study assesses the eco-efficiency of 3D printing compared to conventional construction methods in large-scale structural fabrication. A single-storey 3D-printed house was selected in the United Arab Emirates to conduct the comparative assessment against traditional concrete construction. The life cycle assessment (LCA) framework is utilized to quantify the environmental loads of raw materials extraction and manufacturing, as well as energy consumption during construction and operation phases. The economics of the selected structural systems were investigated through life cycle costing analysis (LCCA), that included mainly the construction costs and energy savings. An eco-efficiency analysis was employed to aggregate the results of the LCA and LCCA into a single framework to aid in decision making by selecting the optimum and most eco-efficient alternative. The findings revealed that houses built using additive manufacturing and 3D printed materials were more environmentally favourable. The conventional construction method had higher impacts when compared to the 3D printing method with global warming potential of 1154.20 and 608.55 kg CO₂ eq, non-carcinogenic toxicity 675.10 and 11.9 kg 1,4-DCB, and water consumption 233.35 and 183.95 m³, respectively. The 3D printed house was also found to be an economically viable option, with 78% reduction in the overall capital costs when compared to conventional construction methods. The combined environmental and economic results revealed that the overall process of the 3D-printed house had higher eco efficiency compared to concrete-based construction. The main results of the sensitivity analysis revealed that up to 90% of the environmental impacts in 3D printing mortars can be mitigated with decreasing cement ratios.

Struvite, a crystalline structure comprised of ions of magnesium $\left({\mathrm{Mg}}^{+2}\right)$ , ammonium $({\mathrm{NH}}_4–\mathrm{N})$ , and phosphate $({\mathrm{PO}}_4–\mathrm{P})$ , is commonly encountered in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) through struvite encrustation. The gradual accumulation of this crystal in pipes and fittings leads to high costs due to downtime and replacement of parts. Technologies that are used to reduce this problem are ideally located in biological nutrient removal plants downstream of anaerobic digesters, as high levels of ${\mathrm{NH}}_4–\mathrm{N}$ and ${\mathrm{PO}}_4–\mathrm{P}$ typically characterize anaerobic digester supernatants. In 2003–2004, two technical-scale, struvite recovery studies were conducted on-site at the City of Penticton, B.C., Canada and the City of Richmond, B.C., Canada using a novel technology developed by the environmental engineering group at the University of British Columbia. The results of these studies showed an average reduction of 80% in phosphate and a dense, spherical product, 5–10 times larger than any commercially available struvite to date. Overall, the recovery of struvite has enormous commercial potential, which results in WWTP becoming more sustainable, concurrently reducing problems typically associated with their operation.

In this study, the workability of a pilot-scale, fluidized reactor was examined to determine effectiveness in removing, and recovering, phosphorus as struvite, from centrate at Lulu Island Wastewater Treatment Plant (LIWWTP), Richmond, British Columbia. The crystallization process was run continuously over a period of 5 months in two runs (Run 1 for 4 months and Run 2 for a month). In addition to efficient recovery of phosphorus as struvite, the study also investigated factors that affect the growth of struvite. Chemical analyses were conducted on the harvested struvite to determine its purity. Results showed that the reactor was capable of removing over 90% of phosphate and 4% of ammonia-nitrogen, with greater than 85% of the phosphate removed being recovered as harvestable struvite crystals. It was possible to achieve over 90% P-removal at a pH of 7.5; this is contrary to the information found in literature, which recommends that a higher pH (8.2–9.0) is required. Factors that affected phosphate removal were the operating pH, the reactor supersaturation ratio (SSR), the N:P and Mg:P molar ratios. Analysis of the harvested product showed that the crystals were composed of nearly pure struvite (96% by weight), with small amounts of calcium and traces of other metals. High resolution SEM pictures were taken of the inside of the crystals to determine the influence of Mg:P molar ratio on the compactness of the crystals.