Over the years it has been widely stated that approximately one-third of asthmatic women experience worsening of the disease during pregnancy. However, the literature has not been reviewed systematically and the meta-analytic reviews include old studies. This study aimed to examine whether the prevalence of worsening asthma during pregnancy is still consistent with prior estimate or it has been reduced. A detailed Clinical Questionnaire on respiratory symptoms, medical history, medication, use of services, occupation, social status, home environment and lifestyle was administered to random samples of the Italian population in the frame of the Gene Environment Interactions in Respiratory Diseases (GEIRD) study. Only clinical data belong to 2.606 subjects that completed the clinical stage of the GEIRD study, were used for the present study. Out of 1.351 women, 284 self-reported asthma and 92 of them had at least one pregnancy. When we considered the asthma course during pregnancy, we found that 16 women worsened, 31 remained unchanged, 25 improved. Seven women had not the same course in the different pregnancies and 13 did not know. The starting age of ICS use almost overlaps with that of asthma onset in women with worsening asthma during pregnancy (19 years ± 1.4), unlike the other women who started to use ICS much later (30.3 years ± 12). In addition, the worsening of asthma was more frequent in women with an older age of onset of asthma (18 years ± 9 vs 13 years ± 10). Among women who completed the ACT during the clinical interview, the 50% of women who experienced worsening asthma during pregnancy (6/12) had an ACT score below 20. Asthma was observed to worsen during pregnancy in a percentage much lower to that generally reported in all the previous studies. There is still room in clinical practice to further reduce worsening of asthma during pregnancy by improving asthma control, with a more structured approach to asthma education and management prepregnancy.

Specific molecular and inflammatory endotypes have been identified for chronic respiratory disorders, including asthma and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). These endotypes correspond with clinical aspects of disease, enabling targeted medicines to address certain pathophysiologic pathways, often referred to as “precision medicine”. With respect to bronchiectasis, many comorbidities and underlying causes have been identified. Inflammatory endotypes have also been widely studied and reported. Additionally, several genes have been shown to affect disease progression. However, the lack of a clear classification has also hampered our understanding of the disease’s natural course. The aim of this review is, thus, to summarize the current knowledge on biomarkers and actionable targets of this complex pathologic condition and to point out unmet needs, which are required in the design of effective diagnostic and therapeutic trials.

COVID-19 modified the healthcare system. Nasal-pharyngeal swab (NPS), with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase (PCR), is the gold standard for the diagnosis; however, there are difficulties related to the procedure that may postpone it. The study aims to evaluate whether other elements than the PCR-NPS are reliable and confirm the diagnosis of COVID-19. This is a cross-sectional study on data from the Lung Unit of Pavia (confirmed) and at the Emergency Unit of Palermo (suspected). COVID-19 was confirmed by positive NPS, suspected tested negative. We compared clinical, laboratory and radiological variables and performed Logistic regression to estimate which variables increased the risk of COVID-19. The derived ROC-AUCcurve, assessed the accuracy of the model to distinguish between COVID-19 suspected and confirmed. We selected 50 confirmed and 103 suspected cases. High Reactive C-Protein (OR: 1.02; CI95%: 0.11–1.02), suggestive CT-images (OR: 11.43; CI95%: 3.01–43.3), dyspnea (OR: 10.48; CI95%: 2.08–52.7) and respiratory failure (OR: 5.84; CI95%: 1.73–19.75) increased the risk of COVID-19, whereas pleural effusion decreased the risk (OR: 0.15; CI95%: 0.04–0.63). ROC confirmed the discriminative role of these variables between suspected and confirmed COVID-19 (AUC 0.91). Clinical, laboratory and imaging features predict the diagnosis of COVID-19, independently from the NPS result.

Background: Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory condition characterized by permanent bronchial dilation, recurrent infections, and progressive lung damage. A subset of patients, known as frequent exacerbators, experience multiple exacerbations annually, leading to accelerated lung function decline, hospitalizations, and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study is to identify distinct phenotypes and treatable traits in bronchiectasis frequent exacerbators, since it could be crucial for optimizing patient management. Research question: Could clinically distinct phenotypes and treatable traits be identified among frequent exacerbators with bronchiectasis to guide personalized management strategies? Methods: We analysed a cohort of 56 bronchiectasis frequent exacerbator patients using 21 clinically relevant variables, including pulmonary function tests, radiological patterns, and microbiological data. Hierarchical clustering and k-means algorithms were applied to identify subgroups. Key outcomes included cluster-specific characteristics, treatable traits, and their implications for management. Results: Four distinct clusters were identified: 1. Mild, idiopathic bronchiectasis (Cluster 1): Predominantly mild disease (FACED), idiopathic etiology (93.3%), and cylindrical bronchiectasis with moderate obstruction (60%). 2. Rheumatological and NTM-associated bronchiectasis (Cluster 2): Patients with systemic inflammatory diseases (50%) and NTMever (50%) but minimal infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 3. Mild, post-infective bronchiectasis (Cluster 3): Exclusively mild disease, mixed idiopathic and post-infective etiologies, and preserved lung function. 4. Severe, chronic infection phenotype (Cluster 4): Severe disease with high colonization rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (71.4%), advanced structural damage (57.1% varicose, 50% cystic bronchiectasis), and frequent exacerbations. Interpretation: This analysis highlights the heterogeneity of bronchiectasis and its frequent exacerbator phenotype. The treatable traits framework underscores the importance of aggressive infection control and management of airway inflammation in severe cases, while milder clusters may benefit from preventive strategies. These findings support the integration of precision medicine in bronchiectasis care, focusing on phenotype-specific interventions to improve outcomes.