Dearth periods associated with less floral resources negatively impact Apis mellifera colony performance. Artificial diets offer nutritional supplements to sustain bee colonies under stressful conditions. An eight-week feeding trial was conducted using various artificial diets (eight diets, including a control diet), formulated with varying quantities of pulses, yeast, fenugreek powder, vegetable oil, dry apricot powder, and powdered sugar. Colony performance of bees subjected to different artificial diets was evaluated based on diet consumption, brood area, adult bee population, worker bee longevity, honey production, and enzymatic activity. Diet-7, which uniquely combined lupin, mung bean, and chickpea flours, proved the most efficacious and was the most consumed diet (84.29 ± 1.61 g), while diet-1 showed the lowest consumption (35.30 ± 1.08 g). Maximum brood area was recorded in colonies which were offered diet-7 (1385.95 ± 14.91 cm²), followed by diet-6, whereas the lowest was observed in the control (831.03 ± 18.95 cm²). The adult bee population was highest in diet-7 (21,594.50 ± 94.55 bees/hive), while lowest in the control (diet-0) (12,625.43 ± 385.06 bees/hive). Worker bee longevity was greatest in diet-7 (49.40 ± 0.41 days) and lowest in the control group (37.01 ± 0.39 days). Honey production was also highest in diet-7 (8.86 ± 0.21 kg), while lowest in the control (2.79 ± 0.35 kg). The results further showed that the enzymatic activities of bees were significantly improved due to diet-7, with the highest values for amylase (48.62 ± 0.23 U/mg), lipase (16.85 ± 0.20 U/mg), proteinase (25.21 ± 0.18 U/mg), and α-glucosidase (39.21 ± 0.21 U/mg). In conclusion, statistical analyses confirmed that diet-7 emerged as the most effective artificial diet, enhancing colony performance across all evaluated parameters. Future research should aim to optimize diet formulations and evaluate their effectiveness on colony health, including gut microbiome and immune function, across different seasons and ecological regions.

Apis mellifera L. is an important pollinator of both wild and domesticated crop plants, thus greatly contributing to plant biodiversity and commercial agriculture. However, in field conditions, honey bees remain exposed to different pesticides which ultimately affect colony health parameters and their associated ecological services. In the current study, the individual toxicities of sub-lethal doses of two distinct insecticides (bifenthrin and acetamiprid) belonging to different groups (pyrethroid and neonicotinoid) were assessed against the foraging activity, social interactions, and longevity of A. mellifera. The bees were exposed to individual doses of both insecticides via the dietary trophic route through contaminated pollen and nectar under natural field conditions. Sunflower crop (Hysun-33) was sown at nine different sites with an isolation distance of 3 km, and was treated with different doses (1/2, 1/4, 1/10, and 1/20 of the recommended field doses) of both insecticides. However, the untreated control crop plots were not subjected to any chemical treatments (bee colonies received no insecticide, and served as the baseline for making comparison). Twenty-seven bee colonies were introduced in these sites after seven days of treatment applications. Significant differences were observed in the foraging activity of A. mellifera (including bees going out from the hive, returning foragers, and those carrying pollens). The fecundity, adult longevity, and social behaviors like trophallaxis and antennation were significantly lower in bees exposed to higher individual insecticidal concentrations. However, the hatching duration, larval duration, and pupal duration were not affected by the tested insecticidal treatments. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the dietary trophic exposure of sub-lethal doses of insecticides compromised colony activities, which is indeed a matter of concern regarding the existing pesticide application methods in different agro-ecosystems. Such impacts may ultimately impair the survival of colonies, particularly when bees remain exposed to these chemicals over an extended period of time. Therefore, future studies must consider the pesticide application techniques and their application timing to mitigate the direct and indirect negative impacts of pesticides on pollinators.