A few decades ago, the technological boom revolutionized access to information, ushering in a new era of research possibilities. Electrochemical devices have recently emerged as a key scientific advancement utilizing electrochemistry principles to detect various chemical species. These versatile electrodes find applications in diverse fields, such as healthcare diagnostics and environmental monitoring. Modern designs have given rise to innovative manufacturing protocols, including screen and additive printing methods, for creating sophisticated 2D and 3D electrochemical devices. This perspective provides a comprehensive overview of the screen-printing and additive-printing protocols for constructing electrochemical devices. It is also informed that screen-printed sensors offer cost-effectiveness and ease of fabrication, although they may pose challenges due to the use of toxic volatile inks and limited design flexibility. On the other hand, additive manufacturing, especially the fused filament fabrication (or fused deposition modeling) strategies, allows for intricate three-dimensional sensor designs and rapid prototyping of customized equipment. However, the post-treatment processes and material selection can affect production costs. Despite their unique advantages and limitations, both printing techniques show promise for various applications, driving innovation in the field toward more advanced sensor designs. Finally, these advancements pave the way for improved sensor performance and expand possibilities for academic, environmental, and industrial applications. The future is full of exciting opportunities for state-of-the-art sensor technologies that will further improve our ability to detect and determine various substances in a wide range of environments as researchers continue to explore the many possibilities of electrochemical devices.

A low-cost and disposable graphene polylactic (G-PLA) 3D-printed electrode modified with gold particles (AuPs) was explored to detect the cDNA of SARS-CoV-2 and creatinine, a potential biomarker for COVID-19. For that, a simple, non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor, based on a Au-modified G-PLA platform was applied. The AuPs deposited on the electrode were involved in a complexation reaction with creatinine, resulting in a decrease in the analytical response, and thus providing a fast and simple electroanalytical device. Physicochemical characterizations were performed by SEM, EIS, FTIR, and cyclic voltammetry. Square wave voltammetry was employed for the creatinine detection, and the sensor presented a linear response with a detection limit of 0.016 mmol L⁻¹. Finally, a biosensor for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 was developed based on the immobilization of a capture sequence of the viral cDNA upon the Au-modified 3D-printed electrode. The concentration, immobilization time, and hybridization time were evaluated in presence of the DNA target, resulting in a biosensor with rapid and low-cost analysis, capable of sensing the cDNA of the virus with a good limit of detection (0.30 µmol L⁻¹), and high sensitivity (0.583 µA µmol⁻¹ L). Reproducible results were obtained (RSD = 1.14%, n = 3), attesting to the potentiality of 3D-printed platforms for the production of biosensors.