Generative AI (GenAI) is accelerating design space exploration and multimodal prototyping in industrial design (ID), bringing new efficiencies and possibilities to early-stage ideation and cross-media expression. Yet many studies do not clearly define stage-wise human–GenAI roles, preserve constraints as traceable cross-stage artifacts, or provide verifiable stage-wise evaluation, undermining traceability in both concept convergence and concept-to-engineering handover. To address these issues, this paper proposes GID-HGCC, a GenAI-driven human–GenAI co-creation ID framework that links four core stages: requirements confirmation, concept generation, concept evaluation, and 3D modeling. First, it specifies stage-wise responsibilities and defines the corresponding inputs and outputs. Second, it establishes a traceable cross-stage artifact flow—“structured prompts–candidate concepts–evaluation outputs–3D engineering issue list”—to support continuous constraint transmission and explicit documentation. Third, it integrates a multi-dimensional evaluation criteria system with IVIFNs–CRITIC–TOPSIS for concept ranking, and further strengthens convergence reliability via preference–consistency diagnostics. The framework is validated through a case study on a portable passive cervical spine rehabilitation training device. Expert preferences over stage-wise co-creation artifacts exhibit an overall medium-to-high level of consistency, and the Top-5 overlap between each expert and the group ranking ranges from 0.80 to 1.00. These results demonstrate that GID-HGCC offers an operational reference for constraint-guided human–GenAI co-creation in ID, improving traceability and handover reliability from requirements confirmation to engineering refinement.

Apple picking is an inherently labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly task, and robotic harvesting represents a potential alternative to address this challenge. This study presents the development and field evaluation of an integrated robotic system for apple harvesting, which combines machine vision, a dual four-degree-of-freedom (DoF) manipulator, and a mobile platform. The harvesting mechanism employed a streamlined 4-DoF manipulator driven by closed-loop stepper motors, incorporating a differential gear mechanism to execute yaw and pitch motions. Trajectory planning utilized linear interpolation with a harmonic acceleration/deceleration profile to ensure smooth end-effector movement. Fruit detection and localization within the canopy were performed by a stereo vision system running a lightweight deep neural network, achieving a mean hand-eye calibration accuracy of 4.7 ± 2.7 mm. Three negative-pressure driven soft end-effector designs—a suction soft end-effector (SSE), a grasping soft end-effector (GSE), and a suction-grasping soft end-effector (SGSE)—were assessed for their harvesting performance. Field trials conducted in a commercial spindle orchard demonstrated that the GSE achieved the highest performance, with a harvesting success rate of 80.80% among reachable fruits, a full-process success rate (from detection to collection) of 61.59%, an overall fruit damage rate of 10.89%, and an average single-fruit cycle time of 5.27 s. In contrast, the SSE and SGSE showed lower success rates (49.21% and 64.71%, respectively). This work provides a practical robotic harvesting solution. It validates the feasibility of a zoned, multi-manipulator harvesting strategy and delivers comparative data to guide the development of more efficient and robust harvesting robots.

Asymmetry of product–service systems, that is, the presentation of services that does not match the expectations of stakeholders, often leads to inefficient services. To address design asymmetry in service systems, this study proposes a stakeholder-centric methodology for failure touchpoint identification and service reconfiguration. Grounded in the principles of multi-stakeholder value co-creation, the framework involves a three-phase process: systematic identification of failure-prone touchpoints through tripartite analysis (enterprise, service personnel, and user perspectives), generation of reconfiguration alternatives aligned with prioritized stakeholder requirements, and multi-criteria decision-making to optimize service configuration. The methodology achieves design symmetry by integrating stakeholder evaluations across failure diagnosis, causal analysis, and solution validation phases. A case study on a visitor management system demonstrates significant improvements in service quality (overall score increased from 0.70 to 0.81), validating the approach’s efficacy. This research bridges the gap in existing studies by balancing multi-stakeholder interests, offering a novel contribution to service design literature.